Jump to content

2024 MLB Draft Chat


Recommended Posts

The draft kicks off on July 14th this year, running for three days in total.  The O's first four picks are at #22, #32, #61, and #97.  With the days counting down, it seems a good time to look at the latest news, opinion pieces, mocks, etc.

CBS Sports: Five potential picks who likely slipped down board, including who could go back to school

I was not high on Amick or White, so hopefully the O's will be looking elsewhere come draft time. 


MLB Pipeline: Mock Draft- June 20, 2024

Quote

22. Orioles: Brody Brecht, RHP, Iowa (No. 21)
Callis: “There's some risks because he doesn't have a lot of consistency in terms of throwing strikes. He also has only been playing baseball full-time for like a year and a half. ... He doesn't have five pitches like Paul Skenes, but the fastball-slider combination are similar to Paul Skenes. It's that overpowering. He doesn't have the command. He doesn't have the rest of it to go with it.”


Perfect Game: Top 400 Prospects

Edited by Greg Pappas
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would hope that Amick and White, two RH hitters with defensive questions aren’t in the mix for either #22 or #32.    Assuming Benge, Honeycutt, and Moore are gone.   Most mocks had them going before #22 and Moore and Honeycutt had nice post seasons which may have sealed that.  I honestly don’t see all teams picking 10-21 passing on Brecht.   So, I’d be okay with any of the 4 players mentioned but I’d gamble on Brecht if I had a choice of all four.

Brecht and someone like Tyson Lewis (HS SS) would be my hope for the first two picks.   If Brecht isn’t there I’d prefer Gillen or Lindsey at #22 and still be fine with Lewis or best college pitcher at #32.   College pitchers.  HS bats.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

I would hope that Amick and White, two RH hitters with defensive questions aren’t in the mix for either #22 or #32.    Assuming Benge, Honeycutt, and Moore are gone.   Most mocks had them going before #22 and Moore and Honeycutt had nice post seasons which may have sealed that.  I honestly don’t see all teams picking 10-21 passing on Brecht.   So, I’d be okay with any of the 4 players mentioned but I’d gamble on Brecht if I had a choice of all four.

Brecht and someone like Tyson Lewis (HS SS) would be my hope for the first two picks.   If Brecht isn’t there I’d prefer Gillen or Lindsey at #22 and still be fine with Lewis or best college pitcher at #32.   College pitchers.  HS bats.

Yeah, this is one of the drafts I wouldn't be surprised to see Elias go outside of the college bat route.  College arms are intriguing at both #22 and #32.  I'm not enamored with the HS bats as much as I typically am, but there are a few that would be worth a shot in that range. 

Edited by Greg Pappas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/25/2024 at 1:26 PM, Greg Pappas said:

At 22, college bats Carson Benge and Kaelen Culpepper would seem to be Elias-type picks.  But with just 19 days to go, it won't be long to see how it plays out. 

It’s a mystery but I haven’t seen one recent mock that had Benge available at #22.  Of course, that means very little as there are always surprises, especially one you get past the first 8-10 picks.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At #22 if Rainer or Bonemer are there you might consider what their respective $ numbers are and see if you can go underslot. This may work better for Bonemer (committed to UVA) than Rainer (committed to Texas) in the era of NIL.  If either Griffin or Morlando fall to #22 I would take them. I doubt that happens, however.

Another consideration is to go with a toolsy HS OF at 32. 6 of the top 10 HS players on PG list are OF. I like Noah Franco from IMG Academy at 32. "Noah Franco is a 2024 OF/LHP, 1B with a 6-3 192 lb. frame from Bradenton, FL who attends IMG Academy. Taller and high waisted frame with extra long limbs for the height. Ran a 6.52 in the sixty yard dash. A primary outfielder with really good instincts. Long strides and good routes, working through the ball with a fluid and clean funnel to release. Big arm strength at 96 mph. Lots of feel. Also has good ability at first base and the arm also plays extremely well there. A left-handed swing, the wrists are elite allowing him to flick the barrel with authority late in the process. All fields approach and lift and carry to the process. Hammered balls in game. A left-handed pitcher, loose arm action with big upside and the ball comes out clean and down hill. Ride to the heater when down. Lands the curveball and change up and sequences his three pitch mix well. Excellent athlete and the highest level 2-way potential at the next level. Excellent student. Named to the PG All-American Classic."

https://www.perfectgame.org/Rankings/Players/NationalRankings.aspx?gyear=2024

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • You could. But I think that's harder because every player has their own bat they like. Bats aren't, and haven't ever been, subject to the same kind of requirements balls are. The ball is a very specific size and weight and COR, etc. The rules about the bats are basically that they can't be longer than X (something crazy like 48", which nobody has used in a century+), or heavier than Y (again, tailored to deadball or Ruth era batters). I think the pushback from fans and players if they went away from wood would be very substantial. I think much more substantial than the pushback for the pitch clock or other recent changes. Just guessing, but I think it would be easier to convince the world that moving the mound back is a better option. Just moving away from the sound of ball hitting wood bat might spark a revolution. There are no shortage of people who say college baseball isn't real baseball because of aluminum bats (even if they've moved to composite? I don't watch enough college ball to know.) Also, if you're not careful you could get into a college baseball situation where before they got the bats under control teams were scoring like 10 runs a game or more. And I have no idea of the underlying reasons, but in 2023 the median runs/game across all college baseball leagues was nearly seven, which is a level that hasn't been approached in MLB since the 1800s. The ACC averaged 7.5, which makes pre-humidor Coors look like a Camden Yards where every batter is a right-handed pull hitter.
    • I get that McCann’s bat is not ideal in the lineup (on the days that he plays). And Mullins struggled really bad for about 6-7 weeks. And Mateo/Urias are no great shakes themselves. But even with all/each of them getting regular to semi-regular ABs, we have the #1 offense in the sport. Like it literally doesn’t get any better. So how do we “need” another bat. Maybe if Mayo is still here, he comes up at some point and strengthens us even more? But I struggle to understand the idea of us needing more offense, especially when the pitching is this shaky. Do you want Cano (who know looks like he’s lost it) and Perez coming in to try to hold games in the 7th/8th inning only to turn it over to Kimbrel in the 9th in October?  Maybe we defeat SEA/NY and reach a World Series for the first time in over 40 years. How would you like our chances of potentially Ranger Suarez vs Irvin/Kremer/Suarez/Povich for 2 times in a potential 7 game series? Seems like the Phills would have a strong advantage there, no?
    • I'm guessing that without a major technological breakthrough we're getting the 2024 version. Which, in the absence of other information, is his career averages with a bit of age-related decline thrown in. I'm assuming the year-to-year variation we see in his record is mostly random noise overlaid on his basic talent level.
    • I'd argue that they became the evil empire circa 1920, when they were drawing 40% more attendance than anyone else in the league, game-day related revenues were almost all revenues at the time, and so they started to have resources and payroll substantially higher than any other team. In 1920 the Yanks drew 1.3M fans, the A's 0.3M. The A's didn't have a chance until Connie Mack pulled a Mike Elias and assembled arguably the greatest collection of relatively cheap, young talent the game had ever seen.
    • Also, check out Fangraph's Top 45 O's Prospects review of Mayo:  
    • https://www.mlb.com/news/max-scherzer-rangers-mets-trade   The Rangers on the hook for 22.5M total. According to Cots, NY is paying 30M this year, which means the Rangers had to pay 13M this year.  So, the Os or anyone else will probably only have to pay 5ishM by the time they would deal for him. https://legacy.baseballprospectus.com/compensation/cots/al-west/texas-rangers/
    • Why not change the bat? The idea that wood bats make sense in the modern era is rather suspect. Give hitters a better weapon and offense will improve. Make the barrel bigger and the bat lighter. Equipment guys could "fit" each hitter like the guys in the Tour equipment trucks do now on the PGA tour. Leave the ball the same. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...