Jump to content

You can dismiss it as "one bad game"...but it's very telling.


Recommended Posts

Lose by one run or lose by 20 runs, it still counts as only 1 lose in the lose column.  The good news from that disaster, they only used 3 pitchers, with an off day tomorrow, the bullpen should be in good shape for the week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Burnes is a top level Ace. Grayson is a top level 2. Suarez is a top level 3 with a sub 3 ERA. 

Yeah there is a drop of our backend of our rotation. Every team in baseball has that.  You only need 3 SP in the playoffs. 

Kremer, and one of Povich/McDermott/Irvin will be just fine in the regular season. 
 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, OnlyOneOriole said:

For you being a journalist and writer?  I am disappointed that you can't use paragraphs.  I mean this is literally grade school writing 101. 

 

"For you being a journalist and writer?" is not a question. In fact, it is not a sentence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Burnes is a top level Ace. Grayson is a top level 2. Suarez is a top level 3 with a sub 3 ERA. 

Yeah there is a drop of our backend of our rotation. Every team in baseball has that.  You only need 3 SP in the playoffs. 

Kremer, and one of Povich/McDermott/Irvin will be just fine in the regular season. 
 


 

Suarez is a top level 3?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am reminded of Earls  answer to the question, can not quote it verbatim ,  as to are the Orioles going to  start a winning streak or continue the present streak.  Anyway, the answer was , quote,  it all depends on tomorrows SP.   A simple answer to a difficult question.  He also was not as concerned about each day, as much as the particular series the Orioles  were playing at the time. Win the series and at the end you will be in good shape.  We can still do that in this situation.  Go Orioles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, survivedc said:

Suarez is a top level 3?

Yeah not really. IMO they need to trade for a 3 at the very least. Burnes/GRod/New Guy/Kremer and then one of Suarez/Irvin/Povich/McD as your 5, depending who is pitching well and is healthy. Suarez has been way better than expected but I feel like the Cano-esque drop off is coming eventually. I hope not, but just saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • She’s awful.  I wouldn’t take anything she says to mean anything. 
    • This Twitter thread is interesting. A lot of things track. I generally think she doesn’t know much but she does seem to know people around the team. She’s also been a Hyde defender.     
    • I feel like they did it to entice pitchers on short-term deals to come here and now have their stats blow up.
    • Here was the Wheeler extension from this past spring - he is finishing 2024 under the terms of his original 2020-2024 contract, so these are guarantees Middleton and Dombrowski made blind to whether Wheeler would hit any health bumps in 2024. Wheeler 5.30.1990 is 4 plus years older than Burnes 10.22.1994, but has a ton more October achievement, including 7 shutout innings this afternoon.    30 Swings and Misses!!! 3 years/$126M (2025-27) signed extension with Philadelphia 3/4/24 25:$42M, 26:$42M, 27:$42M
    • It wasn’t Cowser and Ortiz for Burnes..it was Cease.  And at that time, they did have to give that to get him, clearly. I never wanted to lose Urias for nothing. And yea, I wanted to trade some of our vets and play the kids…and put more emphasis on the pitching staff. I wanted Hays gone and wanted Mounty gone.   And it was definitely you but whatever. 
    • I don't remember those conversations.  I pegged them at 90-95 wins in the poll, so there's no way I wouldn't have believed they could win 88 games.  Which of course they didn't, even with the injuries and underperformance. The biggest thing I remember arguing with you about last off-season was that we didn't need to give Ortiz and Cowser up to get Burnes and it would be foolish to give up them both.  I specifically argued that we didn't need to trade Ortiz as we could find a place for him to play, specifically citing the likelihood of injury. I really think you're thinking about somebody else.  I'm also not sure why you think you were one of the voices arguing for "depth" as you were willing to lose Mateo and Urias for basically nothing, and they both contributed to this team and were a bulwark against injury/underperformance.  You were willing to trade Cowser and where would we have been without him? This team's performance this year was well within the boundaries of what I expected, if a bit on the lower end.  The only thing confusing to me about it was what happened to Rutschman. That said, my "confusion" is what is the best path forward.
    • I think he’s getting somewhere around $180 million
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...