Jump to content

You can dismiss it as "one bad game"...but it's very telling.


Recommended Posts

Lose by one run or lose by 20 runs, it still counts as only 1 lose in the lose column.  The good news from that disaster, they only used 3 pitchers, with an off day tomorrow, the bullpen should be in good shape for the week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Burnes is a top level Ace. Grayson is a top level 2. Suarez is a top level 3 with a sub 3 ERA. 

Yeah there is a drop of our backend of our rotation. Every team in baseball has that.  You only need 3 SP in the playoffs. 

Kremer, and one of Povich/McDermott/Irvin will be just fine in the regular season. 
 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, OnlyOneOriole said:

For you being a journalist and writer?  I am disappointed that you can't use paragraphs.  I mean this is literally grade school writing 101. 

 

"For you being a journalist and writer?" is not a question. In fact, it is not a sentence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Burnes is a top level Ace. Grayson is a top level 2. Suarez is a top level 3 with a sub 3 ERA. 

Yeah there is a drop of our backend of our rotation. Every team in baseball has that.  You only need 3 SP in the playoffs. 

Kremer, and one of Povich/McDermott/Irvin will be just fine in the regular season. 
 


 

Suarez is a top level 3?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am reminded of Earls  answer to the question, can not quote it verbatim ,  as to are the Orioles going to  start a winning streak or continue the present streak.  Anyway, the answer was , quote,  it all depends on tomorrows SP.   A simple answer to a difficult question.  He also was not as concerned about each day, as much as the particular series the Orioles  were playing at the time. Win the series and at the end you will be in good shape.  We can still do that in this situation.  Go Orioles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, survivedc said:

Suarez is a top level 3?

Yeah not really. IMO they need to trade for a 3 at the very least. Burnes/GRod/New Guy/Kremer and then one of Suarez/Irvin/Povich/McD as your 5, depending who is pitching well and is healthy. Suarez has been way better than expected but I feel like the Cano-esque drop off is coming eventually. I hope not, but just saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm lost for words about why Rutschman struggled, other than as I've long said he's a catcher and you're not going to get a MOO monster bat playing 110 games behind the plate- but the overall outcome of the team was within what I thought was reasonable, if a bit on the low end. Regarding the depth, Holliday and Mayo are more talented than Urias, but if we had gotten rid of Urias, Mateo, and Mountcastle to hand them spots, this team would have been worse for it, and maybe not even make the playoffs. Urias is good.  Mountcastle is good.  They're not "everyday" players according to your definition, but we have exactly one of those guys.  That doesn't mean every one else is " not good." I wouldn't be surprised to see all three back next year.  I wouldn't be surprised if they moved on from 2-3 of them.  Though I think the former is far wiser than the latter, though it depends on a lot of other things.
    • My post is coming off the wrong way.  The OP I quoted seemed like you were “lost for words” about why the team struggled the way they did. All I’m saying is I think you are like that because you didn’t see the scenarios where this much of a drop off from last year was going to happen. And btw, the depth (to me at least) wasn’t a good thing.  Depth is good when the players are good. If not, they are just guys blocking better talent.
    • But we have no idea who told her or of the info is good. She has given no reason to believe her. Im sure someone told her something but im not sure she smart enough to be able to tell the difference between good info and bad info.
    • I'm a big fan.  It doesn't mean I have sources in the clubhouse. Do we have any idea who her sources are?  Does she have any kind of track record of having reliable sources?
    • I don't know who this woman is and I don't do Twitter. And this is what I touched on in the other thread: I don't know what the best path forward is b/c I don't know exactly what the problem is. I don't think Hyde needs to go, but if this is true- and I have no idea if it is or not- he should be gone. The talk of veteran leaders brings questions.  What was insufficient of the leadership of Satandaner, Mullins, Burnes, and Kimbrel?  
    • Sig for me is notably rigorous trying to combat this.    I feel pretty sure he had a say in crafting his very geeky title, a reflection of his personal brand. We'll see how it goes here if it becomes recommending Adam Frazier and Kyle Gibson as correct for the roster once again.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...