Jump to content

2024 Draft Tracker


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Looks like we're saving 2-3k around the edges on some of these signs.  I guess that all goes into the calculus of which overslot we can sign.  So far only the OF from USC has signed for overslot.  

Gonna be interesting. Looks like they are playing hard ball with Honeycutt to get some savings for high school kids. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rbiggs2525 said:

Gonna be interesting. Looks like they are playing hard ball with Honeycutt to get some savings for high school kids. 

14 of the top 30 picks are still unsigned according to BA.    I expect he signs for slot.

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rbiggs2525 said:

Gonna be interesting. Looks like they are playing hard ball with Honeycutt to get some savings for high school kids. 

12 of 30 1st round picks haven’t signed yet, including nos. 18-21 just ahead of us.  A significant majority of the signings so far are under slot by significant amounts.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at all the posted signings for rounds 1-10, the Orioles currently look like they have saved $546,900 with Round 1 - Vance Honeycutt and Round 6 - DJ Layton still to be signed.  The 5% overage allowance is estimated to be appr. another $546K available to help sign the over slot picks in Rounds 11-20. (Over $150k)  Current max available $$ for over slot signings is just under $1.1M.

Rd 12 - Andrew Tess - HS - C

Rd 16 - Nate George - HS - OF

Rd 17 - Iziah Salinas - CC - LHP

Rd 19 - Braylon Whitaker - HS - OF

Hope this helps and gives a quick snapshot.

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, StillanOfan said:

Looking at all the posted signings for rounds 1-10, the Orioles currently look like they have saved $546,900 with Round 1 - Vance Honeycutt and Round 6 - DJ Layton still to be signed.  The 5% overage allowance is estimated to be appr. another $546K available to help sign the over slot picks in Rounds 11-20. (Over $150k)  Current max available $$ for over slot signings is just under $1.1M.

Rd 12 - Andrew Tess - HS - C

Rd 16 - Nate George - HS - OF

Rd 17 - Iziah Salinas - CC - LHP

Rd 19 - Braylon Whitaker - HS - OF

Hope this helps and gives a quick snapshot.

The big questions are if Layton will require significant over slot and if well actually use the 5% allowance. Vance should be slot or under, so 1mm goes a long way to get those other 3 hs and cc guys since it looks like Whitaker signed with no extra funds needed.
 

Tess and George seem like potential challenges, but if we can get Vance and Layton around slot combined, one would hope 1mm could potentially get both done, if not then at least one and Salinas. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks to me like the O's should have taken a couple overslots higher in the draft.  Looks like the O's might have a few hundred thousand left over after signing everyone they can.  I guess they can dump it into the WS party fund or sign Gunnar fund.  Drafting hs pitchers early in the draft must make Elias break out in a rash. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/24/2024 at 9:30 PM, StillanOfan said:

Looking at all the posted signings for rounds 1-10, the Orioles currently look like they have saved $546,900 with Round 1 - Vance Honeycutt and Round 6 - DJ Layton still to be signed.  The 5% overage allowance is estimated to be appr. another $546K available to help sign the over slot picks in Rounds 11-20. (Over $150k)  Current max available $$ for over slot signings is just under $1.1M.

Rd 12 - Andrew Tess - HS - C

Rd 16 - Nate George - HS - OF

Rd 17 - Iziah Salinas - CC - LHP

Rd 19 - Braylon Whitaker - HS - OF

Hope this helps and gives a quick snapshot.

Layton got 80k or so over slot. And Whitaker signed without needing overage. If all the math is right and we use our 5%, we have about 1mm to go sign Tess, George and Salinas. Not unreasonable to hope that can get them all done, assuming Vance comes in at slot. If he’s under slot, all the better to get these guys locked up. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

By my calculations and without touching any slot $ for Honeycutt, the Orioles have $222,700 remaining for exceeding the $150,000 on each of the 16th & 17th picks and they can use the 5% overage of $546,045 or a total of $768,745.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, 86this said:

 

By my calculations and without touching any slot $ for Honeycutt, the Orioles have $222,700 remaining for exceeding the $150,000 on each of the 16th & 17th picks and they can use the 5% overage of $546,045 or a total of $768,745.

How do you figure? For the top 10 excluding Honeycutt, they currently have $145K savings (see OP). Tess was $197K over slot, so they are currently $51.8K in the red before using the overage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/27/2024 at 10:41 AM, Hazmat said:

With Etzel now gone, along w Horvath, I’m really hoping we can sign George.

Was told that George is signing or already has.    Keep in mind, you might not even see George at Delmarva until 2026.

 

Edited by RZNJ
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Warehouse said:

How do you figure? For the top 10 excluding Honeycutt, they currently have $145K savings (see OP). Tess was $197K over slot, so they are currently $51.8K in the red before using the overage.

Miscalculated.  I have it as $52,300 in the red now so either Honeycutt is signing below slot or they're dipping into the 5% overage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah, I agree something like this might happen some day, but only if the union comes around to believing MLB is on shaky financial footing -- if and when that ever happens. I don't like the idea of voiding a players' contract then and there, but perhaps performing below a certain level would trigger some contract years in the future to automatically become option years.  Something along those lines. It's hard to imagine deals like this today, except possibly here and there for players who are known to be very inconsistent.  As long as baseball is considered financially healthy I'm sure the union would push back strongly against deals like this, especially in large numbers.
    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...