Jump to content

Cole Irvin to start tomorrow


accinfo

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’m kind of interested in seeing Brandon Young, but the timing didn’t work out because he pitched on Sunday.  Povich was recalled even though he’s not available until tomorrow at the earliest.  So, I assume this will be one and done for Irvin and then they’ll insert Povich somewhere?    

I think it’s one and done for him in rotation but to me question is then what?  I’m sure they would prefer him to go back to AAA and start but what if a team claims him?
 

Then they would have to keep him in pen as long man to avoid that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CaptainRedbeard said:

This could definitely be one and done for Irvin in the rotation, but with the Eflin injury I wonder if they try to put Irvin back in the pen instead of DFA’ing him. I believe he could not reject the outright to AAA after clearing waivers the first time, but now he could now if they DFA him again.

Young and Irvin are really the only SP depth remaining now, and there’s big questions about all of the SP except Burnes, Kremer and Irvin left standing now making it through the rest of the year. Suárez threw a lot over winter ball, Rogers barely pitched last year and is already pushing his career high IP, and Povich and especially Young are still building up innings as young SP (with Young coming off TJS as well). 

I think Young is a much better option than Irvin now, but Irvin is durable if nothing else. Young also had the 40-man roster working against him (although he will need to be added this offseason, so that’s not much of an impediment), but I also wonder if they will be conscious of trying to not use one of Young’s options this year. This year has really emphasized the importance of optionable SP depth and he projects to be one of those depth guys for the next few years. That’s a very marginal difference in value and it doesn’t outweigh trying to have the best team we can put on the field now, but it could be a factor under consideration.

Beat me to it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eddie83 said:

I think it’s one and done for him in rotation but to me question is then what?  I’m sure they would prefer him to go back to AAA and start but what if a team claims him?
 

Then they would have to keep him in pen as long man to avoid that. 

On 9/1 the rosters expand from 26 to 28.  I think Irvin sticks until then and makes a 2nd start in the rotation.  Then we re-evaluate.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

On 9/1 the rosters expand from 26 to 28.  I think Irvin sticks until then and makes a 2nd start in the rotation.  Then we re-evaluate.  

Exactly.  Smith probably goes down for Irvin today,  then whatever optionable deliver goes when Akin comes back. 

 

They were fortunate that Irvin went unclaimed regardless of what we the fans think of him. He can slide into the BP or spot start. No one could have forcast this many injuries. 

 

Everything is about getting to 9/1 and then seeing where some of the possible returning players are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, maybenxtyr said:

Exactly.  Smith probably goes down for Irvin today,  then whatever optionable deliver goes when Akin comes back. 

 

They were fortunate that Irvin went unclaimed regardless of what we the fans think of him. He can slide into the BP or spot start. No one could have forcast this many injuries. 

 

Everything is about getting to 9/1 and then seeing where some of the possible returning players are.

One of the benefits of Irvin having a guaranteed salary owed to him this year.  If Irvin survives until 9/1, then I can see him being offered arb, and sticking around till the end of ST next season.  We can cut bait with him at the end of ST and only have to pay him 20% of the arb figure we settle on with him.  That's a nice insurance policy.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know how Irvin's going to do today but they need to keep him out there for a while even if he's getting beat around. Can't completely shred this 'pen today with Houston coming up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sucks that the Mets are absurdly right-handed heavy lineup-wise. Really bad matchup for Irvin, who's not a good start to begin with against most teams for obvious reasons.

With that said, wouldn't be surprising if Irvin pulls a good start out of thin air. But if Irvin and Rogers continue struggling, I'd like to see Povich and Young replace them in the rotation. We need to see what we have, especially in the case of Brandon Young. We've already seen what value Irvin has to the O's and the rest of baseball recently - pretty much none - while Rogers has shown what he is for 3 seasons now.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, maybenxtyr said:

Exactly.  Smith probably goes down for Irvin today,  then whatever optionable deliver goes when Akin comes back. 

 

They were fortunate that Irvin went unclaimed regardless of what we the fans think of him. He can slide into the BP or spot start. No one could have forcast this many injuries. 

 

Everything is about getting to 9/1 and then seeing where some of the possible returning players are.

Could be wrong because a lot of roster moves yesterday, But thought it was Eflin To IL, Irvin up (not sure how he got back on the 40) Tate for Akin. Theres nowhere to send Smith down to other than DFA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Brian88 said:

Nick Avila has allowed 10 earned runs in an inning and a third in Norfolk, I'm thinking his spot on the 40 man is toast.

Have to imagine he's a huge DFA candidate.

Edit: Just saw that he was DFA'd

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Safelykept said:

Could be wrong because a lot of roster moves yesterday, But thought it was Eflin To IL, Irvin up (not sure how he got back on the 40) Tate for Akin. Theres nowhere to send Smith down to other than DFA.

Smith has option left. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • What do you mean starting for Slater? He is not a starter. The Ragans matchup makes things interesting because he has reverse splits. I don't know the numbers but they need to start the guys with good numbers vs Ragans and/or LHP changeups, whether they are LH or RH.
    • Perhaps. I'm just saying he could stop the Chiefs, the Raiders disaster, and the Cowboys debacle certainly gave me pause.  Last night they certainly looked better, but the first 3 games gave me pause. I think we'll know more after a full season.
    • 1. If the Orioles had signed Jack Flaherty, Seth Lugo and Chris Sale to bolster our pitching staff last off-season, this place would have gone ballistic, and not in a good way. 2.  The Orioles ended the regular season last year flat as a pancake, and it carried into the offseason.  This year, while under the pressure of trying to keep up with the Yankees, the team struggled mightily to find consistent offense and any overall consistency.  Once that pressure waned with us knowing our destiny, guys seemed to loosen up, and we saw the offense come back.  I thought that might happen.  However, my question is, after laying an egg in the playoffs last year and recent struggles despite the last two series, does the pressure of the postseason put us back in the funk we saw throughout most of August and September? 3.  I've seen a consistent theme in this forum over the past week or two which is this:  "All we have to do is get hot at the right time, like Texas did last year."  While I agree that's true, and want us to be that team this year, isn't that statement kind of an admission that without getting hot, we're not good enough on our own merits to persevere in the tournament?  And before I get crucified for saying that, I'll point to what everyone has witnessed in recent months:  Bad/inconsistent bullpen, inconsistent offense, questions about our starting pitching, defensive lapses and being prone to not showing up offensively.  And please, let's not act like some, or all of these, don't exist.   That all being said, Go O's!!!!!  Let's get hot!!
    • All of the October ones will.    Tomorrow good chance to be the least important one if things go any kind of good. Granted ~40% chance it is the only one, but that is short series baseball, not him. I won't have warm feelings if he handles these guys but is bad twice the next series.
    • Would be upsetting to start Slater in any playoff game at this point. Even if you think Mullins/Cowser cant hit LHP (news flash Slater cant either)- keep the defense and the guys who "got you there"
    • If the point was "Skubal is better" you kind of proved that for them. More innings, more K's, less ER, less Walks, less hits, better W/L. Across the board. Ragans is very very very good- but Skubal is better, and the runaway for AL Cy Young. Either is capable of shutting down an offense- and Ragans did just that earlier this year. But we also roughed up Ragans in the other start. No matter who we face, we're going to find things that make it tough, its the playoffs. Lets keep playing good ball and get payback for 2014. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...