Jump to content

MacPhail's frugality is hurting this team


JTrea81

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 216
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Well, you've seen more from MacPhail in 2 years than you'd seen in the previous 9.

I'm not sure that's debatable.

Capisce?

MacPhail is an improvement over the previous regimes in most regards, but there is so much more that he should and could be doing with the resources the Orioles have to get us back to where we need to be.

It just gets really frustrating to see him stick to a plan regardless of the opportunities there are to deviate due to the Orioles resources to get us to compete faster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MacPhail is an improvement over the previous regimes in most regards, but there is so much more that he should and could be doing with the resources the Orioles have to get us back to where we need to be.

It just gets really frustrating to see him stick to a plan regardless of the opportunities there are to deviate due to the Orioles resources to get us to compete faster.

Gotta build the foundation before you buy the penthouse, bud.

MacPhail and Jordan have done a magnificent job of doing a little bit of both via the draft & a couple trades. That's not easy to do in such a short amount of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:scratchchinhmm:

Who would you like us to spend $140MM on?

If you don't think the talent is worth the money, you don't spend the money!!!!!

HELLO!!!!

Exactly. We've gotten to the crux of the argument here. JTrea and his almost handful of supporters, want MacPhail to spend money just to spend it.

What's that old cliche? Is that money burning a whole in your pocket?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MacPhail is an improvement over the previous regimes in most regards, but there is so much more that he should and could be doing with the resources the Orioles have to get us back to where we need to be.

It just gets really frustrating to see him stick to a plan regardless of the opportunities there are to deviate due to the Orioles resources to get us to compete faster.

In all honesty...do you really find this much fault in what is happening? Or is this mainly just extended fallout from the Tex signing.

(for the sake of full disclosure, I too was livid at the offer we presented and feel it was pretty telling that we will never really compete for premier FAs)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, I never dreamed I'd hear someone, ANYONE, complaining about the Orioles not deviating from a plan.

For years and years we complained about there not BEING a sustained plan.

Shocking.

+1. Amazing that someone could consider coming up with a plan, and adhering to it, a bad thing.

Proof that some aren't happy unless they're unhappy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ha! Are you kidding me!? You really believe that Angelos said "hey, go spend whatever you want on the draft, Boras guys, whatever - blank check!" up through 2007, but as soon as MacPhail came on board they teamed up to clamp down on everything?

First let me state that I do not agree with this thread, probably to the suprise of many. Now I need to chime in on this one. I know for a fact that Duquette ageed to pre draft parameters with Boras for both Weiters and Arrieta. It's also my understanding that Boras told some teams ahead of the O;s that Weiters and Arrieta would not sign with them if drafted. That being said I remember an interview AM gave after being hired and he mentioned that Weiters may not have been his selection if he were in charge before the draft. Bash Flanny and Duq for the likes of Walker and Baez but give them credit for brokering Weiters and Arrieta to become Orioles.

There is also a big difference between drafting Ackley and getting him signed. Same as wanting Tex and signing him. AM got boned by Boras while with the Cubs and hasn't really dealt wirh him since. I posted before the draft that we would not draft Boras clients and it's holding true to form.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, you've seen more from MacPhail in 2 years than you'd seen in the previous 9.

I'm not sure that's debatable.

Capisce?

It is debatable because AM is not operating under the same restrictions, mandates and cash flow as those before him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First let me state that I do not agree with this thread, probably to the suprise of many. Now I need to chime in on this one. I know for a fact that Duquette ageed to pre draft parameters with Boras for both Weiters and Arrieta. It's also my understanding that Boras told some teams ahead of the O;s that Weiters and Arrieta would not sign with them if drafted. That being said I remember an interview AM gave after being hired and he mentioned that Weiters may not have been his selection if he were in charge before the draft. Bash Flanny and Duq for the likes of Walker and Baez but give them credit for brokering Weiters and Arrieta to become Orioles.

There is also a big difference between drafting Ackley and getting him signed. Same as wanting Tex and signing him. AM got boned by Boras while with the Cubs and hasn't really dealt wirh him since. I posted before the draft that we would not draft Boras clients and it's holding true to form.

I'm certainly fine with giving Duquette credit for allowing Joe to draft Wieters and Arrieta. However, MacPhail is the guy who stepped in at the last second and closed the deal with Boras to get Wieters signed, so he has to get some credit.

Also, I'm fine with avoiding Boras guys unless they are a can't miss guy or a guy the Orioles really, really covet. I'm completely on board with taking players who have agents you can deal with and not have to worry about getting shelled. When a team drafts a premium guy like Wieters, they expect to pay premium, but when you have a half dozen guys who think they are premium guys but most agree they are not, that's when it's smart to avoid the Boras guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is debatable because AM is not operating under the same restrictions, mandates and cash flow as those before him.

It's only debatable if you have a closed, slanted view against MacPhail or have a one-sided blind opinion that things just don't move fast enough.

The minor league system is better, we have young, premium talent on the major league roster, we have broken through the international market, especially in Japan, we have better Dominican facilities, and for once, we have a plan that has not be deviated from.

I give Beattie credit for signing Joe Jordan, I give Duquette/Flanny credit for signing Huff, acquiring Guthrie for nothing, and allowing Jordan to do his thing, and pretty much everything else that is good right now I give credit to MacPhail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm certainly fine with giving Duquette credit for allowing Joe to draft to Wieters and Arrieta. However, MacPhail is the guy who stepped in at the last second and closed the deal with Boras to get Wieters signed, so he has to get some credit.
I thought MacPhail had to pull in Angelos to get the deal done. Otherwise, who knows if the deal would have closed.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry this is a few pages back, but...

Originally Posted by DrungoHazewood

"You keep repeating over and over that the O's should spend like a large market team, but they're 23rd in the league in attendance, and reside in the 26th-largest media market in the country (behind Sacramento, Charlotte, Indianapolis, Portland, and Pittsburgh).

According to wikipedia, the television market that is Baltimore is actually 22nd, larger than Pittsburgh, Portland, and Indianapolis. But it is close to those markets in any event.

What this sort of assesment doesn't take into account at all is that the Orioles' media market includes more than just the Baltimore market - which doesn't include most of Montgomery or PG county as well as parts of Howard. And this is to say nothing of DC itself, parts of NoVA, south-central PA, Delaware, etc.

I'm all for the O's being a Baltimore team - road uni's and all - but they have media revenue well beyond a team like the Pirates because the Baltimore-Washington market - even shared with the Nationals - is much larger and more complicated than the simplified media-market ranking (be it 26 or 22) suggests.

This, of course, isn't to sidetrack the whole discussion. And I definitely see your point in terms of the current attendance - though that's a bit of a chicken/egg problem - attendance being so tied to on the field performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
    • I think Young will be added, and that is it. I like Pham, but no AAA experience makes him unlikely to be taken. Whatever open spots should be used to upgrade the bullpen and other pitching depth. It is well documented here that we don’t have much beyond raw guys like Strowd and Heid. we lack flexibility and options. This has to change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...