Jump to content

Abolish The Draft


Recommended Posts

Fan Graphs

My proposal would take $200 million from the revenue sharing pool and redistribute it for the purpose of creating budgets for yearly amateur talent acquisition. The draft is eliminated all together, and instead, a worldwide unsigned player auction would be held each summer. College kids, high school kids, international kids – all of them would be eligible for open bidding, where agents could negotiate the best deal they could get for their client with any team that is interested.

Each team would be capped at spending no more than allotted through the revenue sharing pool, which would be based on a two year moving average of their ranking in winning percentage. So, for example, the $200 million could be split up like this.

Average Win% over last two years, descending order.

Teams 1-5: $2 million each

Teams 6-10: $3 million each

Teams 11-15: $5 million each

Teams 16-20: $8 million each

Teams 21-25: $10 million each

Teams 26-30: $12 million each

The top tier teams who have been winning recently would receive small sums of money that would essentially take them out of the running for the premium talents. Given that the teams that finished in the bottom half would likely be willing to bid ~60-70% of their budgets on the top guys available, the Strasburgs of the world would probably command bonuses in the $7 or $8 million range, which the winning teams would not be able to match.

This is a really interesting concept. In following paragraphs, he states you could focus on college pitching if you really wanted to.

Of course, the only problem is how do you go about filling out the minor league teams. How would undrafted free agents fit into this model.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fan Graphs

This is a really interesting concept. In following paragraphs, he states you could focus on college pitching if you really wanted to.

Of course, the only problem is how do you go about filling out the minor league teams. How would undrafted free agents fit into this model.

Yeah, basically what I was telling Stotle, except I graded it out instead of combining every 5. Forces the teams to spend the shared revenue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fan Graphs

This is a really interesting concept. In following paragraphs, he states you could focus on college pitching if you really wanted to.

Of course, the only problem is how do you go about filling out the minor league teams. How would undrafted free agents fit into this model.

Well, our draft budget this year ended up being under 9 million this year and I'm sure there are a few filler guys. Might need another 1-2 million for 6 year FA's or something. Since every team needs fillers this amount could be equal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That plan is nice and all, but it would probably be better if we tried to discuss a real possibility in improving the draft. Something like that will never happen. Like I said, it's a nice stat-head view on it, but not anywhere near reality.

Just because you don't want to discuss it doesn't mean that people should forget about it. You are right that it isn't realistic in the current atmosphere but we can still discuss it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's a really good idea, but the powers that control mlb (yanks, bosox) would never allow it.

Any undrafted/ unsigned prospect could just report to minor league camp if invited and receive standard pay for that level.

They are only 2 teams in a league of 30. If the majority of owners want it, it could happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if some players would take less money to go Boston, NY, LA, etc. Teams like KC might get the shaft from certain players even if they are the highest bidder.

I was thinking the same. Yankees and BoSox still give the best chances to get money when they sign a contract. What would stop them from signing guys to a bigger contract a year later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are only 2 teams in a league of 30. If the majority of owners want it, it could happen.

The teams that are currently pocketing a good part of the revenue sharing pool will probably also oppose it, though they'd be dumb to do that. But they're already dumb.

BTW the article is by Dave Cameron. An idea this good deserves the credit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fan Graphs

This is a really interesting concept. In following paragraphs, he states you could focus on college pitching if you really wanted to.

Of course, the only problem is how do you go about filling out the minor league teams. How would undrafted free agents fit into this model.

Not a bad idea but there's a much simpler solution... Just make the drafted prospects sign with the team that drafts them (or allow them to be traded) for an amount negotiated by the union. They could sign out of high school or when they finish college or any year in between, that would be up to the player. I would even allow for earlier FA to offset the "loss of control" to the players. This system is pretty much already used by the NHL and works fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Fred Biletnikoff!  King of Stick.  Lol.  The refs hated him because every time he touched the ball it got the gook all over it and then the refs got it all over themselves.  Lol  And I agree that it should be allowed in a modest way in MLB. Just because you say it, doesn't make it so. What year was it before they started checking Pitchers after every half inning for sticky substances?  There was a year where it was pretty clear that pitchers were using something... tacki-goo?  I forget what year that was.  Were arm injuries up that year?  It might sway me a little if they were, but otherwise I don't think the the firmness of the grip is indicative of the spin.  The firmness of the grip is the control of the ball itself.  A harder grip would diminish spin.  Think of it as "english" in tennis.  The racquet glances the ball, but its the speed of the racquet that determines the spin.
    • We could be the Astros who have won 2 WS appeared in another. And been to what FIVE consecutive ALCS? With the extreme approach that we took to amass this kind of talent, I would rather set the bar high. We didn’t need to undergo the misery of extreme tanking just to have a team that could qualify for the playoffs each year. The Brewers and Guardians have that and they didn’t employ the extreme tank tactics. What we did forced MLB to change the rules to prevent it from being done again.
    • Agree.  It’s almost universal amongst all sports that size is valued when evaluating amateurs for projection.  
    • Burnes, Westburg, Ohearn, Grayson, Kimbrel, Santander. In that order.
    • I don’t think it’s a big deal about the report that the Orioles made a call about Crochet. That’s just Elias doing his job and professional due diligence. I’m sure he has and is making a lot of “calls”. I also don’t see teams like KC or SEA trading their best pitchers for players like Mountcastle, Urias, Hays, etc. That is a net negative for those teams. They are actually trying to win too and have very smart people running their orgs. The chances of us shedding spare parts for prime time pieces are very very slim. It is not likely that we are going to swindle anyone. It’s more likely to be a value for value exchange.
    • My preference is to be good for 10 years.  The best teams rarely wins.  Let’s be consistent like the Ravens in 2007-2012 and win one.  Or the Braves.  Make a move for a great reliever, sure, but that shouldn’t cost the elite talent.
    • Son of a gun.  I was just going to find Frobby’s double digit strikeout thread and post this.  😀
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...