Jump to content

Reimold is going to Norfolk


TravelerRU

Recommended Posts

So the Homerun he hit on May 5th wasn't hit "even slightly hard"? Hyperbole much?
Wasn't that mostly just a pretty lazy fly ball that carried out and hit the foul pole? I didn't see it, but I heard it on the radio, and both Manfra and Angel were shocked that it ended up as a homerun.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Wasn't that mostly just a pretty lazy fly ball that carried out and hit the foul pole? I didn't see it, but I heard it on the radio, and both Manfra and Angel were shocked that it ended up as a homerun.

He hit it pretty well. It was right down the line and didn't need much distance to get out. I wouldn't call it a moonshot, but he turned on it pretty well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So there is no chance that hitting at AAA can help him get back to hitting like he should be quicker than continuing to try things up here with plummeting confidence would?

Things don't have to be optimal to be good. Sending Reimold down if his confidence is down is a good move. Maybe Jones or Scott should have been sent down instead, but that doesn't mean Reimold didn't deserve to go down and can't benefit tremendously from some time at AAA.

The thing is, he may be regaining that stroke right now anyway.

Why not see if he starts to build on these last 20 at bats? Why not let him get through the weekend and then see where he is at?

You could send down Lou now and then see how things stand after another 5 or 6 games.

If he is back to struggling or whatever at that point, then fine, send him down.

But don't send him down when he appears to be showing signs that he is coming out of his slump.

As I said in the other thread...Jones is a better candidate to go the minors for this reasoning than Reimold is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn't that mostly just a pretty lazy fly ball that carried out and hit the foul pole? I didn't see it, but I heard it on the radio, and both Manfra and Angel were shocked that it ended up as a homerun.

Yes, I didn't think it was hit pretty hard.

Honestly, I could see the Front Office making this into another Bergesen move. Reimold will play everyday for Norfolk for a week or two. If he's hitting well after that, he will be back in Baltimore by June.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has been, you're right. But everyone has noted how much Reimold's slump has effected him. He needs some confidence. Maybe going down to Norfolk and getting on a hot streak will give him that confidence back. I have to imagine that he's back here as soon as he gets hot.

Unless of course the demotion completely kills his confidence and we never see Nolan in an Orioles uniform again!

I understand the points brought up in this thread, but this team, everything about them, is just infuriating right now.

Good thing we're playing the "bad" teams now so we can get on a roll! :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good Lord folks... Really? Don't you see what this is? They're recharging his batteries so he doesn't have to do it under the microscope. He'll be back in so little time he doesn't use an option if he gets his swing together. Haven't you noticed that he hasn't hit a ball solidly in forever? He works the count, gets a good pitch to hit, and then hits a weak grounder or pop up. He is clearly struggling.

This isn't about the "weaker" player. This is about leaving Montanez as the fifth outfielder, starting Scott in left every day, having Patterson to back up Jones, and getting Reimold on track. Really, I'm surprised you guys don't see this. Montanez is completely immaterial in all this.

vatech come on. He is hitting .310 vs lefties. He is 3 for his last 10. In the next 10 days that he is required to stay in the minors the O's play KC, Cleveland and Texas in one of the best hitting park in the league. That is a perfect time for him to play everyday if that is what they want him to do. Who is ahead of him? Scott? Atkins? Hughes? Montanez? Corey Patterson? Come on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I look at it differently.. If they moved Montanez to AAA, then that's showing they've lost all faith in Reimold as an everyday player.

You send down the guy that has a shot at helping your ball club to get at bats and get his swag back, not the one that is going to be a 6th or 7th OF on any given team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good. If that's the case, he should mash AAA pretty well and be promoted back up quickly.

Has to be at least 10 days though unless there is an injury.

If he goes on some hot 10-15 pace, after going 6-20 with 2 walks here, he will still have to stay down there for around another week before the Orioles can bring him back up.

Its just pointless to do it right now...it should have either been done 2 weeks ago or they should have waited until the Clev or KC series was over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was there on May 5. The Homerun hit near the very top of the foul pole, the only question was whether it would hook foul. He definately hit it hard.

BTW do we really think the O's will play worse because Reimold is in AAA for two weeks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it comes down to who is the better prospect, and what is better for his long term development.

Very true. None of us have this knowledge, though, and I'm certain this was discussed by the FO. But I'm not sold that Nolan is just now finding his stroke. He's been terrible and he can always prove he's deserving of a promotion with his play at Norfolk.

Time will tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good. If that's the case, he should mash AAA pretty well and be promoted back up quickly.

Well, the only thing I can hope for is that Reimold, Arrieta, and Tillman all carpool together on their trip from Norfolk to Baltimore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yeah, I agree something like this might happen some day, but only if the union comes around to believing MLB is on shaky financial footing -- if and when that ever happens. I don't like the idea of voiding a players' contract then and there, but perhaps performing below a certain level would trigger some contract years in the future to automatically become option years.  Something along those lines. It's hard to imagine deals like this today, except possibly here and there for players who are known to be very inconsistent.  As long as baseball is considered financially healthy I'm sure the union would push back strongly against deals like this, especially in large numbers.
    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...