Jump to content

Point Blank. Our Opening Day first baseman will be...


shorty122dude

Honest Answer: Our OD First baseman will be...  

188 members have voted

  1. 1. Honest Answer: Our OD First baseman will be...

    • Adam LaRoche
      74
    • Derrek Lee
      45
    • Luke Scott
      56
    • Billy Butler
      4
    • Other (please specify)
      9


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 131
  • Created
  • Last Reply
This is the first factual thing you have stated all thread long.

And yet he still had a higher OBP and more RBI than Tejada.

Well he had 17 more home runs that led to those 14 more RBI's, which look real nice. It's when he's not hitting homers that concerns me. This is why Tejada had 72 more hits. I'd take hits over homers anyday. A hit provides more impact than homers, when most of the homers come when no-one is on, or is in a situation where it means nothing. What I wish, is that there was a way to see how many of Reynolds homers came with bases empty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well he had 17 more home runs that led to those 14 more RBI's, which look real nice, it's when he's not hitting homers that concerns me. This is why Tejada had 72 more hits. I'd take hits over homers anyday. A hit provides more impact than homers, when most of the homers come when no-one is on, or is in a situation where it means nothing. What I wish, is that there was a way to see how many of Reynolds homers came with bases empty

Little known fact: Homers always create runs. Hits do not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To get on base. 72 more hits by Tejada, and higher average shows me he did it at a more consistent basis

You are quite simply the worst poster I have ever been exposed to during my time on the O/H. Your arguments are utterly incoherent, and every time you make a statement it is littered with ignorance. Please, just sit back and learn something first. Once you start to get a grasp of what is going on, and you have gathered some information to support your stance, then post.

I really am not trying to pick a fight. I enjoy talking baseball on here with the O/H crew. And I certainly do not mind a divergent view point. I often have them myself. But, you have to make some kind of reasonable attempt to defend your position. Just making off the cuff jibberish is getting old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are quite simply the worst poster I have ever been exposed to during my time on the O/H. Your arguments are utterly incoherent, and every time you make a statement it is littered with ignorance. Please, just sit back and learn something first. Once you start to get a grasp of what is going on, and you have gathered some information to support your stance, then post.

I really am not trying to pick a fight. I enjoy talking baseball on here with the O/H crew. And I certainly do not mind a divergent view point. I often have them myself. But, you have to make some kind of reasonable attempt to defend your position. Just making off the cuff jibberish is getting old.

O.k, one that can't be debated. Reynolds might have a hard time adjusting to American league pitching. I'm curious to see if that adjustment is made. If he stuck out 600 times in 3 years with ARI, then wonder how he'll fare in the toughest division in baseball? And if my views make you so angered, then just put me on ignore, and debate with the ones that agree with your views. Not here to agree or disagree, just not letting the "Everything is great with this team" be the only one allowed. Reynolds is a cheap alternative, main point I'm making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

O.k, one that can't be debated. Reynolds might have a hard time adjusting to American league pitching. I'm curious to see if that adjustment is made. If he stuck out 600 times in 3 years with ARI, then wonder how he'll fare in the toughest division in baseball?

Considering that the NL West led divisions in strikeouts by a fair margin, there is no reason to assume that Reynolds will strike out more in the AL East.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

O.k, one that can't be debated. Reynolds might have a hard time adjusting to American league pitching. I'm curious to see if that adjustment is made. If he stuck out 600 times in 3 years with ARI, then wonder how he'll fare in the toughest division in baseball? And if my views make you so angered, then just put me on ignore, and debate with the ones that agree with your views. Not here to agree or disagree, just not letting the "Everything is great with this team" be the only one allowed. Reynolds is a cheap alternative, main point I'm making.

Are you related to OldFan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what you are saying, is that you are content with having Reynolds as a long term solution at 3rd? I have higher expectations, that is the diffrence. Beltre would have been the fill at 3rd to be made, but we all know the C word that led to it being Reynolds opposed to Beltre. Ever wonder why 3rd was the first thing addressed? I believe it was to say "Now we don't have to add a $ guy like Beltre"
The level of intelligence in your posts in no way justifies the level of arrogance. The difference between the two is staggering. Give it a rest, please.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

O.k, one that can't be debated. Reynolds might have a hard time adjusting to American league pitching. I'm curious to see if that adjustment is made. If he stuck out 600 times in 3 years with ARI, then wonder how he'll fare in the toughest division in baseball?

Who cares how many times he K's?

He isn't going to be a high average hitter but so what?

What he does is get walks, hit for a lot of power, work the count and play decent enough defense. Its pretty obvious that you only care about stats that don't really matter all that much. What I find funny is your absurd obsession about LaRoche and he k'ed 172 times last year, which is also a lot. Why do your rules and theories apply to Reynolds but not your hero LaRoche?

Did you read what Ripken said about him? Do you think Cal is some hack who knows nothing? Do you think he was wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • When he first came up, his slider was very mediocre and only really used as a get me over change of pace. Now it seems like a weapon. I wonder if he went to school with Professor Bradish for that.
    • Yeah, kinda why I asked the question. That seems real lofty for a comparison.
    • After a really disappointing April that saw his ERA balloon to 7.78, Alex Pham has found his bearings in May, allowing 3 ER in 14.1 IP, allowing 8 hits and 4 walks while striking out 17.   Yesterday Pham allowed a run on 2 hits and a walk in 4.2 innings, striking out 7.   53 of 72 pitches were strikes.  The sole run charged to Pham scored when reliever Kyle Virbitsky allowed a 2-out double to the first batter he faced after relieving Pham in the fifth.    Due to the poor start, Pham’s ERA still rests at an unimpressive 5.29, but he’s definitely been headed in the right direction.  Also, he’s struck out 40 batters in 34 innings.     
    • I can’t emphasize enough how stupid that rain delay was.  No rain at all for 45 minutes, then two hours of light mist, the kind that teams play through all the time.  I was standing near the kids play area during most of the delay and believe me, that rain didn’t deter any kids from using the playground equipment for two hours. Then, 15 minutes before the game is going to start, the grounds crew is watering the infield.  What? The game itself was not worth the wait, needless to say.   But what annoys me most is the complete lack of communication during these delays.  How about letting the fans who are there know what the thinking is about how long the delay will be?  How about an update every 30 minutes or so.   Nope, nothing.   Just a generic message on the scoreboard saying that the start of the game will be delayed to to the “threat” of inclement weather.   My phone was showing .05” of rain expected in the next six hours.  Some threat! On the bright side, the team did announce that ticket holders would be given vouchers that could be used for a Monday - Thursday game.  That was the least they could do.       
    • 19,286 for that rain-delayed mess of a game.  I’d say about 2/3 of those stuck through the 3 hour delay and were in their seats at game time.  
    • And paid Scherzer, and Zimmerman, and Corbin, and Werth.   They didn’t all work out, but nobody could say the Nats didn’t spend to put a winning team on the field during their run.  The run basically ended because Stras II and Corbin blew up in their face.   But there’s always 2019.   
    • I can’t believe that 8 hours after Grayson stepped off the mound, I’m the first person to update his thread.   After a 19-day IL stint and without a rehab stint, Grayson threw 6 innings of one-hit shutout ball last night.  The one hit was an infield squibber hit 59.5 mph off the bat.  His command was a tad shaky at times, as he walked three and hit a batter, but he still breezed through 6 innings on 82 pitches, 50 for strikes.  If it hadn’t been his first outing in three weeks, he certainly could have pitched the 7th inning.  Unfortunately, the bullpen blew it for him. Fastball topped out at 98.4 and he was still hitting 97 in his final inning.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...