Jump to content

Zach Davies is pitching his butt off


wildcard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Obviously I'm biased a bit because I've been on Davies since I saw him pitch in Frederick a few years ago. The 22-year old has allowed just three earned runs on 11 hits and seven walks while striking out 21 in 21 2/3 innings so far in AAA. The young man may only have an average fastball, perhaps even a step below average velocity wise, but he can mix in four pitches for strikes. He needs to get himself about 150 innings this year and he'll be ready to take one of those starting rotations spots that will be open in Baltimore in 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He needs to get himself about 150 innings this year and he'll be ready to take one of those starting rotations spots that will be open in Baltimore in 2016.

It'll be interesting to see how they approach next year. Norris and Chen are gone, but both Gausman and Bundy seem to be the next two up. Davies should be ahead of Bundy in terms of performance, but Bundy will be out of options, so he's headed to Baltimore. Of course depending on how the rest of this year goes, they may just decide he's a reliever and stick him in the pen. Most likely, though, I think Davies starts in Norfolk and is the first in line when a pitcher inevitably goes down. Curious how Wilson factors in as well, though he may be destined to be a swing man/long reliever.

Then of course in 2017 Harvey should be in the mix. Good problem to have.

Regardless, great job Davies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be very surprised if both Wilson and Davies don't get starts in Baltimore at some point this season. Wilson probably the first one up and then Davies.

Wilson I see, but not so sure about Davies. They'll want to keep him in the groove and Gausman is obviously next in line. We'd have to be hit pretty hard by injuries all at once to get to Davies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wilson I see, but not so sure about Davies. They'll want to keep him in the groove and Gausman is obviously next in line. We'd have to be hit pretty hard by injuries all at once to get to Davies.

Most teams have to use more than six or seven starters at different points to get through a season due to injuries, underperformance, double headers, etc. Gausman is on deck with Wilson in the hole. Then I think it's Davies. An argument can be made for Wright but I think his future is in the bullpen and this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The great thing is we can afford to be patient with Davies and give him a full year of AAA rather than inserting him into the rotation prematurely. I'm high on Davies too but want him fully polished up before he sees Baltimore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The great thing is we can afford to be patient with Davies and give him a full year of AAA rather than inserting him into the rotation prematurely. I'm high on Davies too but want him fully polished up before he sees Baltimore.

This. And for the first time in forever we could end up with a logjam at AAA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've really liked following this guy through the system. High K's at every level. But is he Josh Towers 2.0 or does he have a higher ceiling. Keep in mind Towers did have a 3.6 WAR season in his career with a fastball that topped out at 88. So is a better Towers a fair comparison?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've really liked following this guy through the system. High K's at every level. But is he Josh Towers 2.0 or does he have a higher ceiling. Keep in mind Towers did have a 3.6 WAR season in his career with a fastball that topped out at 88. So is a better Towers a fair comparison?

He missed more bats than Towers did and has much better secondary stuff. I think his ceiling is much higher than Towers even though they have some similarities when it comes to build and lack of blazing fastball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He missed more bats than Towers did and has much better secondary stuff. I think his ceiling is much higher than Towers even though they have some similarities when it comes to build and lack of blazing fastball.

Good to hear. So 5th starter or 6/7th inning guy. Considering how much those types get paid in FA, I'll take 6 team controlled years out of Davies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • The money is sunk at this point, but I don't think any polar answer is optimal here.  Bullpen by committee until someone emerges.  It's a little more difficult with the 3-batter rule, but that's how they need to roll and I credit Hyde for being ready with the quick hook for the last 10 days or so.
    • Great sequence in the 10th where Mateo singled, driving in Westburg, stole 2nd and went to 3rd on the overthrow.  Then Mateo scored on a wild pitch.  I've joined the Mateo fan club, at least as a utility player.  Having Mateo on base has to drive pitchers crazy.
    • As someone that was all for DFA’ing McKenna for Hicks last week, I really can’t fault him for tonight.   I’m impressed he stole the base. He sort of had to run there with two outs. He stole it. He just came off the bag. That happens.  The route may have not been the best because he was going to his left and as a RH thrower he was just trying to position himself to throw home. He doesn’t have Vlad Sr’s arm out there. That’s a .01% chance play there.  Our CF depth is pretty thin. I think the only way we DFA McKenna is if Hicks comes here. Kjerstad will be the one to go for Hays. Remember last August when at full strength/healthy Mullins, and only a 26 man roster, we rolled with a 4 man bench of McCann, Hicks, Mateo, Urias/Frazier/Westburg.  Oddly, we’re deep enough into the season, and CF depth is thin, that I’d say there’s a 50/50 shot McKenna doesn’t clear waivers. I don’t know we have the luxury of CF depth to DFA him w/o Hicks in the mix. 
    • I think they will DFA him. They already did it once. And the fact nobody claimed him means you’re probably right about not starting for other teams. 
    • I had fun watching the extra innings of this game. That was good TV. Thanks Craig for serving up the evening’s entertainment!
    • Additionally, you can hover over the user name you want to ignore and a box pops up. The last button on the right at the bottom is the ignore button, click that and check all three boxes and you're done. Source: I'm a professional ignorer.
    • We have threads asking for Kremer, Grayson, and Povich in the closer role. Can we acknowledge that Cano is the pretty obvious next man up if Kimbrel is removed at some point? I don’t really care about his 9th inning splits. He’s our best reliever and until he gets a chance and fails I’m going to assume that’s just noise and he’ll do the best job. Tonight makes nine straight appearances with either a Save or Hold. Overall he has held a lead 10 times in 11 chances, and the one miss was a bad outing but still nearly a SV if not for Gunnar’s walk-off throwing error. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...