Forums
-
Orioles and Baseball
-
- 1,083,098
- posts
-
- 71,578
- posts
-
- 2,842
- posts
-
- By weams
-
- 665,730
- posts
-
- 38,335
- posts
-
- 123,257
- posts
-
-
Ravens and NFL
-
- 76,842
- posts
-
- 20,295
- posts
-
- 7,064
- posts
-
-
Hangout Community
-
- 52,816
- posts
-
- 723
- posts
-
- 245
- posts
-
- 13,915
- posts
-
- 8,133
- posts
-
- 12,841
- posts
-
- 6,494
- posts
-
- 43,687
- posts
-
- 37,791
- posts
-
- 1,569
- posts
-
- 921
- posts
-
-
Maryland and NCAA Sports
-
- 4,647
- posts
-
- 17,071
- posts
-
- 27
- posts
-
- 6,471
- posts
-
- 6,397
- posts
-
-
Other Sports
-
- 7,059
- posts
-
- 2,889
- posts
-
- 4,108
- posts
-
- 1,587
- posts
-
.thumb.jpg.abaa0d78894547cc0aef2482c2158d57.jpg)
-
Who's Online 28 Members, 0 Anonymous, 213 Guests (See full list)
- John Welch
- atomic
- foxfield
- eddie83
- WalkWithElias
- Darkhawk
- Redskins Rick
- DrungoHazewood
- Going Underground
- MouncastleandMcCormick
- nbets
- maybenxtyr
- AZRon
- calsmanystances
- msporter4
- pacman59
- Feinbird
- ReclaimTheCrown
- OsFanSinceThe80s
- Flosman
- mlrhode
- glenn__davis
- PHRESH
- Tony-OH
- Oriole1940
- bobmc
- BohKnowsBmore
- GuidoSarducci
-
Member Statistics
-
Forum Statistics
34,057
Total Topics2,464,316
Total Posts
Orioles Information
Orioles News and Information |
Daily Organizational Boxscores
|
Orioles Prospect Information |
Statistics |
-
Popular Now
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
-
Posts
-
.thumb.jpg.13113cac3eaf393d496d64a7a1b58a76.jpg)
This is fair from a dollar and sense standpoint...you are correct that the cost of removing Davis is player minimum. However, the cost of wasting a position beyond this year when Davis is without question no longer a major league performer means.... THIS. Yes DrungoHazewood, I agree. I see the argument that keeping Davis this year as debatable as it was likely agreed to in the interview process. Something along the lines of we will take a look and see if we can change anything. But 100%, if he shows up in camp next year, it is an ownership decision. There is no longer a baseball reason to keep him on the roster. Period. -
By DrungoHazewood · Posted
I like his plan. I think if you polled the Hangout you'd get 2/3rds or more of the fans here who like the plan. And when you say "probably less than a million next year" we're forced to take that in the context of your projection that they'd be by far the worst team since 1900, which they'll miss by about 15 games. So they'll probably draw 1.2-1.3 million next year. -
So if they finished 67-95 and drafted 7th by spending $15-20M that is a plan that is working? -
By DrungoHazewood · Posted
Who is complaining? I think a lot of the fanbase, especially the more die hard fans who come to the Hangout, are good with the plan and understood before the season started that this year's team and players were largely irrelevant to the next good Orioles team. The only player anyone should really be complaining about is Davis, because a case can be made that he's standing in the way of development of players for the several years down the road. -
Tough crowd in Boston. 3 straight 1st place finishes and a World Series victory and you have a 3rd place team with a winning record and you are fired. And they had back to back losing seasons before he was hired.
-
