Jump to content

For What It's Worth...


Belkast

Recommended Posts

For the FA years sure, but there is a 0% chance he gets that type of money over the next two years. He won't be expecting to get it either, unless he is hellbent on leaving town. His agents will be intelligent enough to know that nobody gets FA year money during the arb years of a contract extension. It has never happened in MLB history, and Bedard certainly won't be the first.

Got it. Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 289
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Are we not pursuing him at all according to your guy? I just want to know if we are interested. MacPhail hasn't made a statement like some other GMs have already...

Not coming here, no chance of happening, none, nadda, no way!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spoke with my guy and thought I would pass along what I was told. Nothing earth shattering but here it goes.......First the players that we will attempt to get off of next years roster. Gibbons,Payton,Hernandez ,1 of Millar/Huff, Tejada, and Baez.

Gibbons -Good luck, they'll need to add cash

Payton - see Gibbons

Baez - on the disabled list for the 2008 season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And he should be.

Maybe he would rather play in Toronto, but his first priority is financial security.

He will be 29 before opening day and he has yet to pitch a whole season. Durability isn't his strong suit.

His value may never be higher than right now so it would be a risky roll of the dice, imo, for him to wait two more seasons to hit FA.

You are exactly right, and these are the same reasons that I think we would be foolish to at least not see what we could get for him. I really like Bedard, as we all do, but his durability does scare me a little.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Belkast, curious if there's anything more specific being said about Tejada -- who's interested, what kind of an offer they're expecting, etc.
Wow, I can actually hear your knuckles grinding from crossing your fingers hoping that the Cubs won't trade Pie for him. :)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gibbons -Good luck, they'll need to add cash

Payton - see Gibbons

Baez - on the disabled list for the 2008 season.

Gibbons will get cut very soon.

Payton has value if we eat some of his contract.

With Baez, you won't get much for him, but getting rid of him one way or another would be fantastic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Belkast, curious if there's anything more specific being said about Tejada -- who's interested, what kind of an offer they're expecting, etc.

As I said yesterday and it was confirmed by my guy. Your Cubbies are probably the most likely target and Pie would be likely main attraction. They would like to get 3 or 4 other teams into the fold as well to maximize our return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The numbers you've presented are perfect IMO. I wouldn't go any higher than that on Bedard with the question marks looming about him. There is no way I offer him 6 guaranteed years. I would offer him 4 plus two club option years at high dollar amounts like 19 mil/2 mil buy out if I had to do it.

I'm not even sure which way I hope Bedard will work out. He has tremendous actual value but I'm positive his perceived value among GMs is even higher than his actual value. Of course, you could always trade him at some point EVEN if you sign him.

I am right there with you on this post.

I keep going back and forth on Bedard...I guess i will be happy either way.

BTW, if we offer him more than 4 guaranteed years, i think it will be a mistake as well.

The most i could see giving him is 4/54 but that is really the most money Bedard figures to make over the next 4 years...Since we are taking on all the risk, we should be able to get him for 4/44-50 million.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW...Not sure how much everyone cares but Trembley has impressed the hell out of everyone. Sounds like he could very well be a long term Baltimore style manager. His work effort is fantastic and his passion is even better. I am rooting for him.

This may be the most important post in the thread. Having the right manager in place could lead to a long managerial tenure, which would mean the team is doing well, and had made the right managerial choice. I'd like nothing better than to see Trembley retire after 15 sucessful years helming this ship. It would mean that our curse had been reversed.

All he needs is the players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I said yesterday and it was confirmed by my guy. Your Cubbies are probably the most likely target and Pie would be likely main attraction. They would like to get 3 or 4 other teams into the fold as well to maximize our return.

Thanks as always.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
    • I think Young will be added, and that is it. I like Pham, but no AAA experience makes him unlikely to be taken. Whatever open spots should be used to upgrade the bullpen and other pitching depth. It is well documented here that we don’t have much beyond raw guys like Strowd and Heid. we lack flexibility and options. This has to change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...