Jump to content

John Hart the next O's GM?


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 281
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Why are the Angels pursuing Friedman but the Orioles aren't?

Have to give the Angels credit, they are leaving no stone unturned. The Orioles, well, they have interviewed the couple of guys they thought they had a shot at. Not bad guys, but I bet contacting Friedman never even crossed their mind, probably because it's unrealistic. You'd have to be a mad man to leave Tampa in favor of the Orioles. It's the question we all ask every time someone joins the organization "Well, he can't be that great... I mean, he came to us afterall. What self respecting individual does something like that? If this guy's so great, he'd be with another organization."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what one source just told me. Caught me by surprise as well. Treat it as RUMINT (Rumor Intelligence) until I know more.

By the way, I still don't know what to make of this RUMINT. At the end of the day, we'll just have to see how things fall into place. I still don't see the Orioles hiring a young GM unless it's a Hart/Levine President/GM combo which makes some sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have to give the Angels credit, they are leaving no stone unturned. The Orioles, well, they have interviewed the couple of guys they thought they had a shot at. Not bad guys, but I bet contacting Friedman never even crossed their mind, probably because it's unrealistic. You'd have to be a mad man to leave Tampa in favor of the Orioles. It's the question we all ask every time someone joins the organization "Well, he can't be that great... I mean, he came to us afterall. What self respecting individual does something like that? If this guy's so great, he'd be with another organization."

I don't think the issue is quality. But I think you'd be hard pressed to find any GM that would make a lateral move to Baltimore, barring some strong ties to the organization or other reason for wanting to be there. I think you could find some very talented GM candidates that would come to Baltimore for a promotion and their first shot running an organization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the way, I still don't know what to make of this RUMINT. At the end of the day, we'll just have to see how things fall into place. I still don't see the Orioles hiring a young GM unless it's a Hart/Levine President/GM combo which makes some sense.

I like the idea of a Hart/Levine combination. These are two guys that have ties to the organization and, one would assume, share a similar philosophy with Buck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it just means he extended in 2005 and has re-extended since. I'm just guessing tho...

His contract was though 2010 and Texas negotiated that he not interview for GM jobs in exchange for three additional years. I assume that since the ownership change, that they would be fine with him leaving at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
    • This is exactly what EDC said tonight     
    • My guess is more of a safety profile than they preferred. They clearly wanted Wiggins. They ran that pick up fast. And then when you listen to the press conference, the love for the player was obvious.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...