Jump to content

HHP: Duquette's Risky Plan


SilentJames

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I still don't understand where Buck is coming into play here. Is there any evidence that Buck is responsible for the ML stuff?

There was a time that Peter Angelos toyed with Buck being in charge. Either Peter got smart about it or Buck realized that would not be something that he wished to attempt with Peter's team. Buck is not in charge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teagarden was a Buck request. Duquette even said Buck really liked him so they went out and got him.

Absolutely true. Buck specifically asked for him. And Duquette was on the job about a week. I am sure Dan will try to get guys for Buck that he likes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't imagine he would want to. Duquette seems to respect his opinion greatly.

Thanks. That makes complete sense to me. I never have bought the notion that Buck was the "true" GM. Couldn't catch the exact meaning of your earlier post...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matusz and Tillman don't deserve ML spots. They were putrid last year. Guys who showed promise last year are the ones who will be on the ML squad.
We tried that already, and they couldn't hold it together for a full season, or anything close. The best of them will get their chance again, and the others will have to keep pushing or find themselves on the outside looking in. I feel better about challenging these guys to beat out Chen and Wada than I did about forcing them to pitch behind Adam Eaton and Mark Hendrickson.
You haven't blocked them if they prove they belong.

Matusz's season was so horrible last year he doesn't automatically deserve a ML spot.

Duquette and Buck want players to earn their way onto the roster. Just because they have the talent, doesn't mean they get a ML roster spot.

Wada can go to the bullpen, and Chen and Guthrie are the only ones that have roster spots due to their salaries.

The Orioles can easily cut or trade Eveland if they want to. Nobody is really blocked if they show they belong.

Exactly. You can't "block" someone unless you have talent in front of them. If Matusz, Britton, Arrieta, Tillman, etc. perform better than the other guys competing for spots in the rotation, they'll be in the rotation. If they don't, they won't.

So if DD brought in guys who can beat out the guys that were already here, how is that a bad thing? Isn't that the very definition of making the team better? And if they can't beat out the starters but are better bench options than what was already in the organization that is still a net positive.

You guys are looking at this in terms of a general concept.

My points are based on the theory by James. I think the theory is wrong.

Whether he should have brought in more pitchers to send these guys down or not is a different discussion than the point SJ was making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has always seemed to be a shared GM job..with Buck doing a lot of the ML stuff and Duq handling everything else.

between this and DD wanting to blow up the team, I think you're making most of this stuff up. point us to any credible sources that say this is the case. It may be what you think, but not much more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

between this and DD wanting to blow up the team, I think you're making most of this stuff up. point us to any credible sources that say this is the case. It may be what you think, but not much more.

Did you not pay attention to the GM search and how it was widely reported that Buck was going to have more influence on the ML roster than basically any manager? How he has PA's ear? How the GM job was his if he wanted it? People were comparing it the Angels job, where Scoiscia has so much say.

Are people just forgetting all of that? Are we just going to push aside all of that talk we had on here about whether he would be a good GM or not? Seriously?

And its my opinion that DD would blow the team up. I think he sees that this team needs a lot more talent and more depth. He has talked about needing to build through the system and things like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you not pay attention to the GM search and how it was widely reported that Buck was going to have more influence on the ML roster than basically any manager? How he has PA's ear? How the GM job was his if he wanted it? People were comparing it the Angels job, where Scoiscia has so much say.

Are people just forgetting all of that? Are we just going to push aside all of that talk we had on here about whether he would be a good GM or not? Seriously?

And its my opinion that DD would blow the team up. I think he sees that this team needs a lot more talent and more depth. He has talked about needing to build through the system and things like that.

And what about this off season makes you believe that is still the case. Which acquisitions/moves, were at Buck's insistence, inspite of DD's better judgement?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • What do you know about his character?  By all accounts, he’s an extremely good teammate.  I’d say if anything, his character is what keeps getting him opportunity, when his talents are pretty limited.  
    • I’d still despise him.  He is my least favorite Oriole of all time. He’s got the opportunity to do the most amazing thing that most of us would want to do and every time he gets a chance to do it he doesn’t have his head in the game and he doesn’t seem to care. No team wants him, but the Orioles keep holding onto him. And i’m judging his character not just his play because his play is obviously horrible.
    • I think the main issue is that Kimbrel is turning 36 shortly and he’s not cut out to make 78 appearances a year, which is the pace he’s on.  He did that once when he was 23 years old.  He’s only reached 70 appearance one other time, last year, when he tired at the end of the season.   If I’m Hyde, I’m doing my best to limit Kimbrel to 5 appearances every two weeks.   If that means someone else has to pitch the 9th in a save situation every so often, so be it.    
    • Announcers are certainly a personal preference thing. It's very rare for just about everyone to agree positively (Jon Miller) or negatively (cough **Melanie") over an announcer. Heck, even Melanie has her people that enjoy her. I will say this about Kevin Brown, he has a great voice, and no one, and I mean no one can say he doesn't prepare. In fact, if anything he over prepares.  Last night was a good example of knowing when to talk a story and when not to. The Orioles were in the midst of blowing a game they led most of the game. Kimbrel/McKenna blew the 9th inning and Cowser had just made one of the un heads up throws you will see in a crucial situation that allowed the A's to go ahead.  Knowing all that, he had his Mason Miller story all ready to go and he's over there talking about him overcoming diabetes and losing weight and blah, blah, blah while he's blowing the Orioles hitters away with the tie run on 2nd and 3rd. I think in this case, he had something prepared for when Miller would come into the game, but should have realized that giving a flowery story about the opposing closer blowing away the Orioles hitters in this game was probably not the appropriate time to tell the story. If I have one criticism of Brown, it's that awareness of when to tell that story or drop those little funny antidotes, or talk about the cute kid with the cotton candy. Things things all have a time and a place, and I think we more experience Brown will do better in his game awareness. One of the things Jon Miller was great at doing was making a boring game interesting to listen to with those kinds of things. When the action is the most important thing to talk about or if the home team just had something bad happen to it, that's not the time. He'll figure that stuff out eventually.  Regardless, he's an excellent announcer who teams up well with Ben and Palmer to a lesser extent, though he gets a little too goofy at times with the kinder, gentler, older Palmer. By the way, he handled the young man in the booth last night with grace, respect, and seemed genuinely happy to help set the young man up to live out his dream, if even for an inning or two. Well done Kevin, well done (Props to Palmer to for his handling).    
    • I think of it like this - if I’m watching the game in person with someone who is doom and gloom every time something goes wrong, I’m not going to watch the game with that person for very long.    Which is why I don’t  stay long in any game thread either for that matter. 
    • How much money did people have on this game? I know the Moneyline was huge.  Did someone lay the $265 to win $100? The day-to-day rants over a 100 win team after every loss only points to people losing money on the game. We need a new “Gambling Rants Section”.   The takeaways from this game is the Burnes is being a little pitch inefficient and seems stuck on the 5-6 IP range as opposed to the 6-7 IP SP that we need from him. The other one is the offense. You have to adjust to the ballpark. Homers on the road. More doubles and gap shots in our spacious LF.  I never understood what @Tony-OHwas saying about McKenna until last season. His baseball instincts aren’t there. I love the call up. Love the role. You can never argue having a backup CF/defensive replacement/pinch runner type. We have that at Util IF with Mateo, but we were hoping McKenna could fill that role for us. Nah, we might have to look outside the org for a vet Michael Bourn type. 
    • Nice to see some of these guys getting through five innings in the lower levels, building up innings so there will be less restrictions as they age through the system (barring injury of course). Really excited to see the fruits of the international program on the pitching side in particular. Hopefully it leads to our versions of Framber Valdez and the other Astros who have backfilled their rotation in recent years. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...