Jump to content

Reds pushing for Bedard hard?


fewfirstchoice

Recommended Posts

Secondly, you don't trade Erik Bedard for 1 and 2-year filler.You trade him for premium talent-maybe 2 players but premium players-not homers and vottos.

I couldn't agree more. Maybe the trades we are hoping for just aren't out there now. I would take my chances waiting then accepting less than what we need. IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 373
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Why not let Markakis play CF with Murton and Scott play the corners. I think it is a myth to think that Markakis won't hit as well if he is in CF vs RF.

Markakis isn't being moved and if Murton coul dplay RF, the Cubs probably don't sign Fukudome.

BTW, not sure why Votto is getting Casey comparisons...He has big time power...Casey does not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Patterson's value doesn't go down if he's in CF. Good, young ML-caliber CFs are just as hard to find as 2Bs.

You're correct about Jones however, if things break in the M's favor here.

I don't mean to be rude, but have you ever met a Cubs prospect that you didn't think was going to be great? From reading most of the trade talk the last few weeks and your participation I have come to the conclusion that you are high on every player they have. This is a bit of an exaggeration, but I wouldn't be shocked to read on here that you were mad and felt the Cubs were being ripped off if they traded Bedard and Roberts for Patterson and another player straight up. I am sorry if I offend you, but this has been driving me nuts.

I hate this Cubs deal if it goes through by the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Secondly, you don't trade Erik Bedard for 1 and 2-year filler.You trade him for premium talent-maybe 2 players but premium players-not homers and vottos.
Bailey, Cueto, and Votto are all premium players. So are Jones, Clement, Morrow and Balentien. Getting back 2 of those type of guys plus 1-3 other guys ranging from intriguing to good depending on the first 2 you get back is pretty much the ideal trade for Bedard.

People still expecting or holding out for a Kemp, Kershaw, and LaRoche type package are going to end up keeping Bedard, which is a very, very risky move. There is very little chance his value goes up, no chance of getting MLB-ready talent even if it does, and a very big chance his value goes down between now and July.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bailey, Cueto, and Votto are all premium players. So are Jones, Clement, Morrow and Balentien. Getting back 2 of those type of guys plus 1-3 other guys ranging from intriguing to good depending on the first 2 you get back is pretty much the ideal trade for Bedard.

People still expecting or holding out for a Kemp, Kershaw, and LaRoche type package are going to end up keeping Bedard, which is a very, very risky move. There is very little chance his value goes up, no chance of getting MLB-ready talent even if it does, and a very big chance his value goes down between now and July.

Ah, a voice of informed reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, not sure why Votto is getting Casey comparisons...He has big time power...Casey does not.
Go back and look at Casey's first few years, thats the type of power Votto has. He's not a 35+ HR guy, but he should be a 25-30 HR type, which is what Casey looked like he would be after his first several seasons.

People are hearing Sean Casey comparisons and cringing because of what Casey is now, but he was a very productive guy early in his career, he just wasn't able to sustain it. Whether Votto will be able to continue that production is a whole different debate, but the comparison is a very apt one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Helton had a .904 OPS in 5 minor league season with 25 homers in his five seasons with 994 at bats. He broke into the bigs at 23 years old.

Vott has a 861 OPS in six minor league seasons and hit 96 homer runs in 2553 at bats. Vottos first real action in the bigs was at 23 years old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is this: we have no "youth" at those positions anywhere remotely close in the minors.There is nothing to develop! Where is the Orioles' top-rated SS prospect folks? WHERE? Center? WHERE? Second base even? again-WHERE?

Secondly, you don't trade Erik Bedard for 1 and 2-year filler.You trade him for premium talent-maybe 2 players but premium players-not homers and vottos.

Your first point is very well taken. But what, in your mind, is "premium" talent? According to MILB.com, Votto is the no. 34 prospect in baseball, Cueto is no. 47. Where's the cutoff?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Me too. Or a left handed Konerko circa '04-'06.

I know this will sound crazy, but Cueto reminds me of Pedro a bit.

Same here, the Pedro that had injury problems starting at age 30. We might get 6-7 Pedro like seasons but then he'll break down. And we might not even get that. Bailey is a safer bet. The only reason he is having command problems is because of the work he's doing on his changeup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Since April 23. 7 for 28 including 2 doubles, 1 triple, and 1 homer.   5 walks.  3 strikeouts.  
    • I’d be very surprised too but it’s all about talent and where you draft.  At 22 it’s tough to get high ceiling talent.  I’d guess Brecht is a reliever at the next level but he’s got dominant reliever upside.  His stuff, reportedly, is as good as any pitcher in the draft.  95 strikeouts in 55 innings as a starter.  
    • He's already a HOF.  It's just that his injuries have killed his chances of being an Inner Circle HOF.
    • With three more hits today, Etzel is at .360/.992. He has 171 MiLB at bats, so a third of a season. Which projects to a full season with:  513 AB 111 R 39 2B 12 3B 12 HR 114 RBI 93 BB 123 SO 90 SB 21 CS .339 AVG .445 OBP .532 SLG Not too shabby!    
    • I would love for someone to explain or justify to me how in the world Mullins catch on 4/15 is listed at 65% catch probability. There are a couple of guys in the league that make that catch but it’s a very short list. Maybe I just don’t understand the stat.
    • Not sure a pitcher technically can get “squeezed” by the automated strike zone but Povich had a number of borderline pitches tonight that could go the other way.  Handley was visibility perturbed by a few of the calls on walks and Povich doubled over in disbelief on a couple of walk calls. He reminds me a little of Tom Glavine how he throws, his wind up, how he hides the ball and how it explodes out his hand….sort of effortless. I heard the announcer for the Sound say Povich’s curveball hasn’t had a hit against it all year long and every other pitch is around .100 batting avg against.  In person, his fastball has a lot more giddy up than the radar shows.  98 pitches tonight and looks like he has a rubber arm.  
    • a game you'd hope Mullins, Mountcastle or Santander would step up and were let down. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...