Jump to content

Jake Arrieta - so frustrating to watch this guy pitch. Talented, but erratic. Will he ever put it to


BamaOsFan

Recommended Posts

Yes. But he made adjustments and he has always shown talent and results in spurts. You don't give up now.

Serious question, what adjustments? He looks like the same guy he always looks like. What are you seeing that I am not?

I would love for them to send him down and tell him to pick three pitches and then keep him down there until he can properly command at least two of them.

It is so infuriating watching him get beat on his 5th best pitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Jake has solid, very solid, peripherals.

That leads some of the more stat minded folks to think he is unlucky or that he may have an epiphany.

I myself have decided that if some pitchers can outpitch their peripherals then it is logical then some pitchers' actual game performance will fall short of what their peripherals suggest they will do.

Those peripherals can't overcome his walks and pitch counts. As was the case with guys like Oliver Perez, Scott Kazmir, and Jonathan Sanchez, all guys with great stuff who were done in by control problems. They're not all completely comparable with Jake from a peripherals standpoint, but the principle that you fail in the majors with a high walk rate applies. Jake's future is in the pen if the Orioles want to salvage his value at the major league level without sacrificing losses this season. Otherwise he should start in Norfolk and show sustained success for two or three months before getting another crack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. But he made adjustments and he has always shown talent and results in spurts. You don't give up now.
I want him to go to Norfolk and prove he can get people out. Like Tillman had to do last year. Arrieta just hasnt proven he can hack it yet.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jake has solid, very solid, peripherals.

That leads some of the more stat minded folks to think he is unlucky or that he may have an epiphany.

I myself have decided that if some pitchers can outpitch their peripherals then it is logical then some pitchers' actual game performance will fall short of what their peripherals suggest they will do.

Agree with this. I'm sick of people pointing to Jake's peripherals.

Now, it's a new season and hopefully after today he'll get back on track, however I wouldn't bet on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to see him get one more start before we give up on him. An opening day start is not a normal situation, some pitchers exceed their norm, others struggle. He was lights out in his last start, so lets get a valid data sample. If he can impress another team, he'll have some trade value, which is what I'm hoping for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do realize that ERA or ERA+ are imperfect measures of talent and future outcomes, right? The Orioles will give him chances as long as they believe he gives them their best potential outcomes now and going forward.

I understand that ERA isn't the best way to judge a pitcher. How about his career 1.4 WHIP then? Or his 4 walks per nine? Im not arguing he doesnt have good stuff. But if you cant locate it, then it doesnt matter. Yeah, that broken bat single was bad luck. But it hurt Jake because he walked two before it happened. Then as soon as the Orioles get him back into the game, he leads off another inning with a walk, leading to the Twins go ahead run. I see the same Jake now that I saw back in 2010. He doesnt attack the strike zone. He allows the hitters to see too many pitches. And he struggles with men on. None of those things screams future success. I always liked Jake, so I hope im wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with CoC....I'd like to know what adjustments you see. Dude looks the same.

Exactly the same. It seems that he just starts overthinking in situations and walks way too many hitters that lead to the disaster innings that show up almost every time he pitches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That might help but I think his biggest problem is that he doesn't have good command of any of his pitches but most importantly his fastball. He can throw strikes but he rarely hits the target.

Hopefully if he concentrates on three it will be easier for him to command at least two of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully if he concentrates on three it will be easier for him to command at least two of them.
Just go with a two seamer, 4 seamer, and pick a breaking pitch, curve or slider. That's only two pitches really but I agree he should simplify things. He wants to be something he's not.

I agree in part. He has to refine some of his arsenal. His CH was devastating when he threw it for strikes today back to back hitters. Before that Palmer correctly noted how he came across his body throwing it and it wasn't close to where Wieters set up. It is a definitely a plus pitch and I think he doesn't focus enough on it because he's constantly throwing two seamers and four seamers. Pick one, ditch the other. My preference would be to keep the four seamer. His two seamer, while contributing to his great "stuff" his the pitch I see him having the most difficult time commanding. And I agree with the breaking stuff, CB or SL not both. That CB is a nasty pitch.

FB, CH and CB to focus on would leave him a lot less to think about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The team talks about depth at starting pitching and then they start Jake fourth game of year. When is Steve Johnson going to be healthy.. He appears to be our only option for fifth starter. Trade Jake for a bag of balls

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
    • I think Young will be added, and that is it. I like Pham, but no AAA experience makes him unlikely to be taken. Whatever open spots should be used to upgrade the bullpen and other pitching depth. It is well documented here that we don’t have much beyond raw guys like Strowd and Heid. we lack flexibility and options. This has to change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...