Jump to content

Davis didn't get bigger, he got better


avdeuph

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I wasn't that far off with my paraphrasing. I'm surprised because I'm not that good at remembering things phonetically.

Opps forgot something

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/lP1cCjBkWZU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love to hear exactly how people think PED's are helping Davis to hit more HR. I don't notice increased bat speed. His average distance is the same. He isn't any bigger than previous years. Have they improved his eyesight? Given him more confidence? It is my understanding that PED's mainly improve the speed of recovery after workouts, thus enabling a player to maintain maximum strength over the long haul of a season. There is a biological ceiling in terms of strength, for every individual body. PED's can help one reach that ceiling faster, and stay there, but they can't raise it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love to hear exactly how people think PED's are helping Davis to hit more HR. I don't notice increased bat speed. His average distance is the same. He isn't any bigger than previous years. Have they improved his eyesight? Given him more confidence? It is my understanding that PED's mainly improve the speed of recovery after workouts, thus enabling a player to maintain maximum strength over the long haul of a season. There is a biological ceiling in terms of strength, for every individual body. PED's can help one reach that ceiling faster, and stay there, but they can't raise it.

Seems that anytime someone threatens the oh so precious records that is the first thing people think of. Especially if it is a Yankee record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you guys see the article on ESPN today by Reilly where he said he didn't believe Davis wasn't taking PED's?

A typical Reilly hatchet job which included completely manipulated stats. He makes a big deal out of Davis only hitting 54 home runs in four seasons at Triple A without mentioning that he played in 31, 44, 48, and 103 games in those seasons. That makes for a home run every four games.

I totally understand the questions about Davis given how huge he is, how he's hit this season, and how the Rick Reillys of the world couldn't have picked him out of a lineup of one last year. We asked (and still ask) the same questions about Jose Bautista. We defend Davis more forcefully because he's our guy. I don't think he's using - he's always been enormous and been a power hitter - but I'm biased. There's also nothing he can say to defend himself against Rick Reilly and the rest of the talking heads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ben Johnson ran times, while on PED's, that were much faster than he ever ran before. Word it however you want. Either PED's raise that biological ceiling or they allow you to reach it when it is impossible to reach it without them.
I also don't notice Davis running any faster. No they don't raise the ceiling. Read up on them and get back to me. Or if you have read about them, please give me your source. It is much harder to reach your ceiling without them, and few do even with them, but not impossible. Also I would like you to explain to me exactly how PED's could be helping Davis to hit more HR. If he is stronger this year, wouldn't he be hitting the ball farther? Have you noticed increased bat speed? Or are they just magic as you seem to think.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if CD is juicing or not. I really don't like the cheaters in baseball at all and find what Jay Gibbons did reprehensible. I also get aggravated thinking of the international kids who lied about their age and other shenanigans.

Hopefully, CD is clean. What I don't like about Reilly's accusation is the lack of evidence.

I think it is easiest to believe that CD's progression statistically has been very natural. I believe one can look at his stats last year and see that even slight improvements in contact rate and strike zone judgement could lead to a fairly dramatic increase in production. Davis is incredibly strong and one has to hope it is natural and not a Mark McGwire repeat.

One never knows. I mean, for years I told people I never thought ARod juiced because he was always the best of the best - going back to high school; and baseball really didn't have that many or any stories of guys juicing in HS like that. It turns out ARod was. So, it would not be otherworldly news if CD was juicing at such a young age, but it would be most disappointing.

You never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not making the case that Davis is using. I'm making the case that they CAN help a lot. Did PED's help Bonds hit more homers? To say "no" would be na?ve.

An increase in speed or bat speed would most likely be imperceptible to the naked eye. I'm sure, without a stop clock, that Ben Johnson would look just as fast to me at a 10.00 100 meters as a 9.85 100 meters, if there were no other runners.

I've seen interviews with athletes such as Ben Johnson and other sprinters (another was an American woman who was caught and came clean). No better evidence than from the athletes themselves who used it and describe the increase in performance.

And I'm not saying they don't increase performance. Theyjust don't increase your ceiling for performance. PED's didn't make Johnson run faster for 40 yards. They kept him from slowing down as fast over the next 60. Bonds hit more HR on PED's because at an age when he should be declining, he was able to maintain peak performance over an entire season. His average distance didn't increase.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I don’t think it was weird at all.  EDC said it but I thought it unfolded as expected.  You knew the QBs would go. You knew tons of OT and WR would go.   This was always going to be an offense dominated first round. The Oline and WR depth is in every round. I suspect that they go Oline twice or Oline/WR tonight.  Obviously you never know how the board falls but I think that’s what is likely.   This is mainly going to be an offense draft. EDC said a few weeks ago that they will draft a RB.  My guess is that the RB goes sometime in day 3. They will come out of this draft with at least 2 more Olineman, one WR and one RB.  I suspect they take a safety at some point as well. The question will be do they take 9 players.  The Ravens didn’t feel this was a draft with as many draftable players as years past, so I wouldn’t be surprised if they make some kind of a trade. 
    • 1:2 is good.  Elite is a player like Arraez who is 1+:1.  
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...