Jump to content

Boras: Wieters may Test Free Agency


Rene88

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I remember when I said Wieters was an under-performing money grubber with greed. I got slammed, but I think we will be seeing more stories like this that escalate the closer we get to arbitration and free agency.

This is a guy who clearly takes his money, very, very seriously. With the Boras thing and all that stuff.

My ideal world is the Yankees give a MASSIVE contract to an over the hill player and he sucks. Maybe he has a mini resurgence in his contract year and the Yankees do something dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

May not have much value past 29? Hell this looks like a player with not much value after 26.

Buck plays him too much. I can't believe he made him catch both Saturday and Sunday. I wonder if any of better hitting catchers catch as many innings as Matt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless I am missing something, the title of this thread is misleading. The linked article does not quote Boras as saying Wieters will test free agency. The earlier June 30 article that is linked in that article also does not quote Boras as saying that Wieters will test free agency. All I see are some statements that the "team believes" Wieters will test free agency.

In short, there really is no news here, nor has Boras made any "threats." This is a bunch of recycled, second and third hand information that merely suggests that there's nothing new on this front since April. There's absolutely nothing to see here.

Frankly, I'm not that worried about it. There's no real imperative for Wieters and the team to discuss a long term deal right now. He's here through the 2015 season unless we trade him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
    • This is exactly what EDC said tonight     
    • My guess is more of a safety profile than they preferred. They clearly wanted Wiggins. They ran that pick up fast. And then when you listen to the press conference, the love for the player was obvious.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...