Jump to content

Still think O's were wrong on Balfour?


LookitsPuck

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply
True but we can agree with the general idea that the less expensive the established player is from a salary standpoint the more expensive they are from a trade piece standpoint. So if Baltimore is trading prospects for affordable, potential impact bats, it is going to be maybe one really good bat and maybe one more solid first division bat, right? I mean, the system has some talent up top, but it's not likely to see a big influx of talent before the next draft, and those guys won't be traded until the following July. So basically, look at the pieces you have now and try to figure who you might be able to land.

Again, I'm doubtful that ultimately plays, and of course you're trading your pitching depth so hopefully the more expensive Jimenez doesn't end up in a situation where you are eating a chunk of the contract for below value performance (which we have to acknowledge is a possibility).

I'm fully aware that you're very, very skeptical of Duquette and his plan and execution. I have a bit more faith in the way things are progressing. But I also am not some wild-eyed optimist who think it's terribly likely the Orioles magically become an annual contender for anything but one of the wildcards, which means an average talent level in the .500 range. And I'm fine with that. I enjoy watching a watchable Orioles team, I'm comfortable with the realities of a middling budget and a GM who doesn't think plodding along towards a very distant goal of meaningful games is good. And if that means that the 2017 team has some holes and a few bad contracts and finishes 75-92, well, so be it. I'd rather watch that then any of the 1997-2011 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm fully aware that you're very, very skeptical of Duquette and his plan and execution. I have a bit more faith in the way things are progressing. But I also am not some wild-eyed optimist who think it's terribly likely the Orioles magically become an annual contender for anything but one of the wildcards, which means an average talent level in the .500 range. And I'm fine with that. I enjoy watching a watchable Orioles team, I'm comfortable with the realities of a middling budget and a GM who doesn't think plodding along towards a very distant goal of meaningful games is good. And if that means that the 2017 team has some holes and a few bad contracts and finishes 75-92, well, so be it. I'd rather watch that then any of the 1997-2011 years.

Dan has ruffled some feathers in the community that Stotle inhabits as well. I'll gladly watch any teams that Dan and Buck give us. They will compete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
Dan has ruffled some feathers in the community that Stotle inhabits as well. I'll gladly watch any teams that Dan and Buck give us. They will compete.

Me to :)

I think saying the O's were right on Balfour is a mixed bag. Lets not forget they were willing to sign him based on the medicals just not for the originally proposed deal. Its a case were the medicals and Balfour's ego saved us from what would have been a bad signing regardless of how many seasons it was for. Thank god Balfour has that ego and thank god we picked up the medical stuff that started this ball rolling. At the end of the day I am just thankful its Tampa's problem not ours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dan has ruffled some feathers in the community that Stotle inhabits as well. I'll gladly watch any teams that Dan and Buck give us. They will compete.

Why is that? Because he cut back on some scouts and replaced them with stat people? Or has just been rude? Or maybe they don't like his choice of ties?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm fully aware that you're very, very skeptical of Duquette and his plan and execution. I have a bit more faith in the way things are progressing. But I also am not some wild-eyed optimist who think it's terribly likely the Orioles magically become an annual contender for anything but one of the wildcards, which means an average talent level in the .500 range. And I'm fine with that. I enjoy watching a watchable Orioles team, I'm comfortable with the realities of a middling budget and a GM who doesn't think plodding along towards a very distant goal of meaningful games is good. And if that means that the 2017 team has some holes and a few bad contracts and finishes 75-92, well, so be it. I'd rather watch that then any of the 1997-2011 years.

I am surprised at this post and find it to be very discouraging. I want to build for a winner and see it compete in a serious manner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SI just picked the Astros to be in the 2017 World Series based on their collection of young talent.

Honestly picking the World Series champ in 2017 is about accurate as predicting were the stock market might be.....lol

That said Houston has some impressive talent in their system and seem to be intent on doing it right much like we have IMO. They will be a force in a few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • First, the had a jump in 23’ given how terrible they had been previously, which conditions many fans in the marketplace not to care. They simple weren’t relevant for years. So one very good regular season will not undue years of being bad/irrelevant and treating your customers terribly. Next, I think they missed an opportunity in the offseason by not doing enough by way of big/bold attention grabbing moves. Now I acknowledge that this was most likely due to the ownership flux/transition. I believe they got an attendance/marketplace engagement boost when they changed owners and when they traded for Burnes. However, I believe we would have seen more engagement attendance with say a big Gunnar extension and/or bringing in a big time FA.   IMO this would have created more buzz before the season (say around the time people make season tix decisions - IMO before Christmas is when some people make those bigger purchases). All of this is to say, that it will take time and effort on the organizations part because of how bad of a stain that the Angeloses left. I still have friends and colleagues who refuse to support the Orioles and attend games due to the damage that was done. Rubenstien & co are not going to be able to undo 30 years of awfulness overnight. But IMO it is not enough to simply call it “a new chapter”. They have to make new/different actions to distinguish themselves from who the Orioles were/used to be under the Angelos regime.
    • Just checking in on Gameday, Yankees looking incredibly vulnerable.  Should be the Os out there.  Super lame.  Whichever team wins this series I hope gets knocked out by CLE or DET.
    • If the franchise were better, the fan base would be too.  It’s been a rough 40 years.
    • It also means we don’t have to trade our prospect capital to acquire him 
    • Machado just hit a 2 run home run off of Yamamoto.  I hope the Orioles young players are taking notes.
    • Yeah it was priced initially the same as the ALDS games, same as last year. Nobody was rushing to pay those prices. And by the time the tickets reached appropriate levels, by the Orioles lowering their prices or the secondary market coming down in price, fans have like 24 hours to figure out their plans to attend a mid afternoon game. It’s just not worth getting upset about — we still had an awesome crowd and the only thing missing was an offense to ignite it. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...