-
Who's Online 25 Members, 0 Anonymous, 66 Guests (See full list)
-
Posts
-
-
By Sports Guy · Posted
Your complete mischaracterization of Os players aside, Miller is likely nothing more than a 60-70 IP reliever with high arm injury potential. (Note: when I say nothing more, I mean that as I don’t think they convert him to a starter next year or even if they do, I think he’s a ticking time bomb) I don’t care how old Kjerstad is, he’s a high end prospect that you control for 6 years and Stowers is an everyday OFer with big power potential. Sure, in a perfect world you get younger talent and if so, that’s fine..but if they got offered that and that was the best deal on the table, they should make the deal. FWIW, I think that deal would get beaten or they would get someone that maybe isn’t ranked as high as Kjerstad but someone younger and maybe more all around upside even if they come with a bigger risk. -
By LookitsPuck · Posted
100% in on Kirby. Wouldn’t require much on the prospect front. And has some track record. That’ll require the Rangers to throw in the towel. Not sure they’re there, yet. -
By LookitsPuck · Posted
Yes to Crochet, absolutely not for Miller, yes to Skubal. Skubal will require a haul, though. -
-
They are a team that isn't close to contention and have no idea where they are going to end up and when. If they want a 25 year old top 20 prospect and 26 year old AAAA guy for Miller that might make them the morons.
-
By Aristotelian · Posted
Crawford has traditional career splits. I fully agree Akin sucks. I was on an island wanting to option him to keep Baumann. Where I disagree is the idea that Baker was a better option. He sucks too and he is right handed.
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.