Jump to content

Post latest rumors on the Roberts trade here...


TerpmanJay

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 379
  • Created
  • Last Reply
You clearly wrote in both of those posts that "all of us" were doing X. Did you or did you not? Then, you wrote later that you didn't say the "majority" or that we were "insulting the offer". Yet, clearly you did write these things. I didn't make this up.

You did say these things. I linked to the freaking original posts. What are you babbling about? You simply keep changing your story despite being repeatedly caught. Now, you are denying directly copied quotes. LOL

Honestly. It's not my fault you can't comprehend the meanings of words. I said that most of this board has talked down the Cubs offers. That is true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See, that's the problem. Are you talking about fair for the Cubs, or fair for the Orioles? After you got mostly pitching in the Bedard return, I don't thing there's a trade out there that is fair for both teams. The Orioles need position players, mostly middle infielders, and the Cubs don't have very good quality players to offer in that department. To satisfy the Orioles, Hendry would have to give up a package that wouldn't be apporpriate on his side.

I am talking about what you feel is fair & that you think based on your argument you could talk AM into pulling the trigger.

I am not & have not bashed you in this thread. I am just trying to restore some objectivity. I want to hear your side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The idea that the Cubs are low on Murton is totally bogus. The Cubs didn't spend on Fukudome because they're low on Murton. They spent to solidify the outfield with a rightfield anchor. Murton is misplaced in rightfield and that's what "everyone knows," if anything. Fukudome puts top-notch defense in right and balances the lineup with a lefty bat. For better or worse, that's the Cubs thoughts. They are high on Murton but unfortunately his end was spelled not with Kosuke, but with Soriano's inability (again: at least in their mind) to pick up center or right. The Cubs love Murton's bat but need that roster spot to play right and some center, and realize Murton is good enough to play every day if left were open. Heck, as crazy as it sounds, they'd probably put up with his defense in right if he were left-handed. Sorry, this doesn't make him less valuable to the Orioles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am talking about what you feel is fair & that you think based on your argument you could talk AM into pulling the trigger.

I am not & have not bashed you in this thread. I am just trying to restore some objectivity. I want to hear your side.

I know you weren't bashing me, and I appreciate that. I think that the originally rumored offer of Gallagher/Murton/Cedeno was fair on the Cubs side. That doesn't mean I think it's a great trade for the Orioles, that's just what I think is fair for our side. I don't like the idea of overpaying just because the 2 sides don't match up in terms of needs. I feel that in order to get AM to pull the trigger, Jim will have to overpay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been saying this for a while...His value will only continue to get worse unless Soriano goes down with an injury.

I also agree that Cedeno and EPat don't have a ton of value.

However, either of them can start for us and should be able to be close to or league average guys right away for no money.

Murton's bat is needed here...Getting him makes it even easier to deal Scott or Millar or whoever.

Gallagher means we can make a deal with pitching.

The bottom line is, can AM make this 4 for 1 deal and then have another deal waiting in the wings to flip some guys to get a good MIer???

Also, why are we only discussing BRob to the Cubs? The Indians and Rockies should or do have interest.

I've been trying to talk about a Rockies deal but it's hard to get a word in between the sniping.:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the reason that these Roberts-to-the-Cubs threads tend to be a bit more contentious than others is the fact that neither team absolutely needs to make the trade.

Starting the season with Roberts at 2B is certainly not an unthinkable option for the Orioles and there are other teams that could conceivably have an interest in trading for Roberts, either now or later. The Cubs offers that have been rumored have certainly not been "no-brainers" that knock your socks off. That isn't to say that they have not been good offers, they just haven't been the type of offers that would make the Orioles drop everything and say "lets do this."

Not getting Roberts is not the end of the world for the Cubs, either. They made the playoffs without him last year, after all. In DeRosa, they have a decent 2B now who is very popular with the fans. The Cubs are reluctant to part with any pieces that they view as important to them when they don't have an emergency need for Roberts.

This makes for long-winded debates among fans. I think we all just need to recognize that there is not the best of fits here and try not to take things so personally.

Lets all just take a deep breath and bury the hatchet. No matter how worked up we get, we aren't going to decide what happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know you weren't bashing me, and I appreciate that. I think that the originally rumored offer of Gallagher/Murton/Cedeno was fair on the Cubs side. That doesn't mean I think it's a great trade for the Orioles, that's just what I think is fair for our side. I don't like the idea of overpaying just because the 2 sides don't match up in terms of needs. I feel that in order to get AM to pull the trigger, Jim will have to overpay.

I agree that Gallagher,Murton,Cedeno is pretty close... I'd be surprised if the offer didn't include 1 or 2 A/AA prospects as well. Knowing Andy 1 of those would most likely be Veal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL, and now you've changed your tune again. Just a few minutes ago you wrote "majority of the board". I never wrote that. Now, you've written it again.

You wrote that "you all called it crap". A page later you wrote "none of you insulted the offer". Any minute now, I expect you to flip back again.

Are there two different people using your account right now and neither can see the other's posts? Or are you bi-polar? multiple personality? I seriously want to know.

Can somebody else weigh in here? I've never seen anybody deny his own words so emphatically so soon after writing them. Am I wrong or has he contradicted himself all over the place in this thread?

What is wrong with you? Why do you nitpick every single tiny word made by me in order to make me look bad? I've already explained the use of the word "crap", so I'm not going to do it again.

Just a few minutes ago you wrote "majority of the board". I never wrote that.

Are you joking? You were the one that originally made this quote, not me. I used it in reference to your quote, I'll gladly find it for you. Yeah, and I'm the liar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes we do and AM will keep him if needs be.

But MacPhail wants Roberts gone, i have no doubt about it.

He needs to call up the Rockies...They really do make the most sense....The style that they play suits BRob perfectly.

Now, maybe they like Nix enough not to give up the talent to get Roberts???

And what about Peralta? If Peralta and another good young player is on the table, that's also a trade you need to make.

His defense is improved and he hits better than the average SS...He is young and has a good contract the next 3-4 years.

I would love to see some numbers to demonstrate that. Especially Fielding Bible ratings. Doesn't somebody here buy that book?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Awesome research, thanks. I was a fan in 1974 but had forgotten that string of five shutouts.  This last two weeks of rotation excellence (and your list) is giving me flashbacks to the summer of love (1967), when I started to make game logs to savor the strings of shutouts and low-hit gems by Oriole starters. Looking back now at the game logs kept by Baseball-Reference (manually, without your sorting skills!), it's hard to identify exactly which streak so impressed my teenage fan-meter, or even which year. Certainly 1968 was all about low scoring league-wide.  Maybe it was the stretch 22-27 May 1967 featuring Phoebus, Bertaina, Barber, McNally, and Phoebus again (good old 4-man rotation!), including three scoreless outings. Or Hardin and Brabender joining Phoebus, McNally and Palmer from 15 to 20 September, 1967. What about 1969, with Cuellar, Lopez and Leonhard joining the previous cast of McNally, Phoebus, and Hardin, twirling 10 starts (13-22 June) while allowing only 12 runs.  Anyway, it feels rather historic to see this run of high-end pitching from an Orioles rotation. Here's a chart to recap the numbers on this streak in progress... Date Starter IP H ER ERA (14 G) totals: 81.67 59 19 2.09 21-Apr Irvin 6.2 4 0   22-Apr Suarez 5.2 4 0   23-Apr Rodriguez 4.1 11 7   24-Apr Kremer 5.1 3 2   26-Apr Burnes 6 3 1   27-Apr Irvin 7 4 0   28-Apr Suarez 4 7 4   29-Apr Rodriguez 5.2 5 0   30-Apr Kremer 7 4 2   1-May Burnes 6 4 2   2-May Bradish 4.2 4 1   3-May Irvin 6.1 2 0   4-May Means 7 3 0   5-May Kremer 6 1 0  
    • Somehow feels typical of Orioles to play up to the competition, and get burned by the pretenders... same with individual starting pitchers. 
    • It was very obvious ...he would also take a look at his hand frequently. On Saturday, watching a clip in the dugout after one of the HR's, Kremer went to give a high five, pulled back and took a look at his hand. I thought it strange, and I thought something was off. He always appeared to be one of the more enthusiastic celebrators. It would seem the coaches would notice and probably did, but thought nothing of it. Certainly didn't affect his game.
    • Umpire really tried to screw us on Saturday.     
    • I heard someone call it The Great American Smallpark.
    • I just looked thru their record a while ago.  Series against the Nats (2), White Sox, Marlins, Cardinals, Rockies and Angels makes their record of 1 win better than the O's way less impressive.  Their schedule coming up must be hell.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...