Jump to content

Buck: "Gausman will not be optioned if..."


wildcard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Sending him down for a week isn't the solution to that particular problem.

Non-tendering Matusz and Hunter would have been a nice start.

I wouldn't have non-tendered them but would have looked to trade them. But Wright and the two Rule 5s came later.

And MacPhail was good at not making a decision until it was necessary. You don't know who might come up with an injury in those 8 days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sending him down for a week isn't the solution to that particular problem.

Non-tendering Matusz and Hunter would have been a nice start.

Hop in the DeLorean then. I'm just saying what the ideal circumstances are likely to be going forward. Sending him down for a week could be a solution to that problem if someone gets hurt in that week. I would also imagine that it is also easier to get a player through waivers 10 days into the season when 40-man and 25-man rosters are more solidified than the day before the season starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want to characterize it that way. I think if Duquette is unable to trade some guys, they might buy some time by optioning Gausman to start the season.

BTW, I wouldn't call you a liar if Gausman is optioned. Suppose he has a strained hamstring to start ST and is a little behind by the time spring ends. They could send him down to gain innings. There are lots of ways he could still start the year in the minors yet you made a definitive statement that he wouldn't be optioned.

Injuries may get him DL'd not optioned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty hard to say the Gausman is not one of the O's 12 best pitchers IMO.
If you go by the numbers I'd say Gausman is the 5th best out of 6 SP. He may well become one of the top two, but he isn't now. But Buck didn't say now, he said in ST. Gausman may get injured or they may pick up a TOR that bumps him back or he may struggle, it happens. I always find it funny that experienced baseball people like Buck never speak in absolutes because they know the game is unpredictable but fans insist on make categorical judgments.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He didn't say now, he said in ST. Gausman may get injured or they may pick up a TOR that bumps him back or he may struggle, it happens. I always find it funny that experienced baseball people like Buck never speak in absolutes because they know the game is unpredictable but fans insist on make categorical judgments.

Well considering that by some measures Gausman was their best starter last year I don't think they can bring in one guy that bumps him back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well considering that by some measures Gausman was their best starter last year I don't think they can bring in one guy that bumps him back.
What are those measures? Among the SP he was third in K/9, 4th in WHIP, 6th in IP, 5th in QS, 4th in ERA, fifth in BB/9, and oh yes 1st in FIP. I guess all those other measure pale in comparison. :rolleyestf:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are those measures? Among the SP he was third in K/9, 4th in WHIP, 6th in IP, 5th in QS, 4th in ERA, fifth in BB/9, and oh yes 1st in FIP. I guess all those other measure pale in comparison. :rolleyestf:

He was also tied for third in ERA+ with Chen. In an earlier post you said 'if we make it about the numbers' but does that include just what you pick and not FIP?

How about other peripherals like HR/9? Gausman is lowest on the the team at .56 and after that is Tillman at .91 P/9. And pointing out he was 6th in IP? You remember they managed innings right? And even though KG pitched almost 100 fewer innings than Tillman, Gausman almost equaled his output in fWAR.

Tillman 207 IP 2.4 fWAR

Gausman 113 IP 2.1 fWAR

If he's not our best he's well on his way. That's just numbers. Care to guess what any of the scouts think when it comes to ceiling for current Orioles starters? Maybe we should stick categorical judgements where you pick the categories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think his most significant area of focus is fastball command. He has all of the tools to be superb. He just needs to command his fastball. He really is an outstanding young pitcher. He needs to command the fastball in the strike zone. If he does that his secondaries will play very well. I think the PCs known how to get him there. Wallace and Chiti are experienced coaches who know how to get the best from him. I am optimistic about his chances this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was also tied for third in ERA+ with Chen. In an earlier post you said 'if we make it about the numbers' but does that include just what you pick and not FIP?

How about other peripherals like HR/9? Gausman is lowest on the the team at .56 and after that is Tillman at .91 P/9. And pointing out he was 6th in IP? You remember they managed innings right? And even though KG pitched almost 100 fewer innings than Tillman, Gausman almost equaled his output in fWAR.

Tillman 207 IP 2.4 fWAR

Gausman 113 IP 2.1 fWAR

If he's not our best he's well on his way. That's just numbers. Care to guess what any of the scouts think when it comes to ceiling for current Orioles starters? Maybe we should stick categorical judgements where you pick the categories.

Ceiling isn't the issue. Bundy has the highest ceiling of anyone in our orgsnization, but that doesn't make him our best pitcher now. And fWAR is driven by FIP, so citing both is redundant IMO. I'm on record as saying its quite possible that Gsusman will be one of our best 2-3 starters this year, but he wasn't last year IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Awesome research, thanks. I was a fan in 1974 but had forgotten that string of five shutouts.  This last two weeks of rotation excellence (and your list) is giving me flashbacks to the summer of love (1967), when I started to make game logs to savor the strings of shutouts and low-hit gems by Oriole starters. Looking back now at the game logs kept by Baseball-Reference (manually, without your sorting skills!), it's hard to identify exactly which streak so impressed my teenage fan-meter, or even which year. Certainly 1968 was all about low scoring league-wide.  Maybe it was the stretch 22-27 May 1967 featuring Phoebus, Bertaina, Barber, McNally, and Phoebus again (good old 4-man rotation!), including three scoreless outings. Or Hardin and Brabender joining Phoebus, McNally and Palmer from 15 to 20 September, 1967. What about 1969, with Cuellar, Lopez and Leonhard joining the previous cast of McNally, Phoebus, and Hardin, twirling 10 starts (13-22 June) while allowing only 12 runs.  Anyway, it feels rather historic to see this run of high-end pitching from an Orioles rotation. Here's a chart to recap the numbers on this streak in progress... Date Starter IP H ER ERA (14 G) totals: 81.67 59 19 2.09 21-Apr Irvin 6.2 4 0   22-Apr Suarez 5.2 4 0   23-Apr Rodriguez 4.1 11 7   24-Apr Kremer 5.1 3 2   26-Apr Burnes 6 3 1   27-Apr Irvin 7 4 0   28-Apr Suarez 4 7 4   29-Apr Rodriguez 5.2 5 0   30-Apr Kremer 7 4 2   1-May Burnes 6 4 2   2-May Bradish 4.2 4 1   3-May Irvin 6.1 2 0   4-May Means 7 3 0   5-May Kremer 6 1 0  
    • Somehow feels typical of Orioles to play up to the competition, and get burned by the pretenders... same with individual starting pitchers. 
    • It was very obvious ...he would also take a look at his hand frequently. On Saturday, watching a clip in the dugout after one of the HR's, Kremer went to give a high five, pulled back and took a look at his hand. I thought it strange, and I thought something was off. He always appeared to be one of the more enthusiastic celebrators. It would seem the coaches would notice and probably did, but thought nothing of it. Certainly didn't affect his game.
    • Umpire really tried to screw us on Saturday.     
    • I heard someone call it The Great American Smallpark.
    • I just looked thru their record a while ago.  Series against the Nats (2), White Sox, Marlins, Cardinals, Rockies and Angels makes their record of 1 win better than the O's way less impressive.  Their schedule coming up must be hell.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...