Jump to content

Reimold could make an impact if healthy


wildcard

Recommended Posts

We did not know that we could get Snider. We needed a starting outfielder. So much of Lough's WAR is from defensive metrics which are still, at best, volatile.

I do not disagree with that Weams, but still, I am sure they would love to off load his contract right now. I doubt if that's possible, but maybe in spring training someone will sustain an OF injury and we can unload him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Replies 871
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Unfortunately, that ship has already sailed.

I know it's spring training but Young is putting up a 410 OPS right now.

He isn't making so much money that he should feel his job is safe.

I do agree with what Weams was suggesting and that Dan won't make a roster effecting move until there are some regular season games played.

You just know Brady is in Buck's ear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it's spring training but Young is putting up a 410 OPS right now.

He isn't making so much money that he should feel his job is safe.

I do agree with what Weams was suggesting and that Dan won't make a roster effecting move until there are some regular season games played.

You just know Brady is in Buck's ear.

Unless Buck uses Young as he did last season I think he gets overexposed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that is a given.

How he acquired his statistics last year makes me question the repeatability of his season.

Do you believe Reimold would outperform Young over the course of the season? When healthy, they are essentially the same player to me. Look at the 162 game averages below. But I have very little faith Reimold can stay healthy. To me, it doesn't make sense to get rid of Young in order to keep Reimold.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/y/youngde03.shtml

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/r/reimono01.shtml

I think Nolan is nothing but injury insurance/depth for Delmon. He starts in Norfolk. If he really hits down there and stays healthy for April and May, then maybe we trade Delmon and bring up Nolan. But I can't see carrying both Delmon and Nolan and I can't see getting rid of Young for Nolan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you believe Reimold would outperform Young over the course of the season? When healthy, they are essentially the same player to me. Look at the 162 game averages below. But I have very little faith Reimold can stay healthy. To me, it doesn't make sense to get rid of Young in order to keep Reimold.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/y/youngde03.shtml

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/r/reimono01.shtml

I think Nolan is nothing but injury insurance/depth for Delmon. He starts in Norfolk. If he really hits down there and stays healthy for April and May, then maybe we trade Delmon and bring up Nolan. But I can't see carrying both Delmon and Nolan and I can't see getting rid of Young for Nolan.

I see Young with a career OPS+ of 99 and Reimold with a career OPS+ of 103.

I see Reimold as someone who can steal a base if they need to.

I see Reimold as having a career ISO of .188, Young is at .141.

I see Reimold as having a career walk rate of 9.3%, Young is at 4.2%.

Young has Reimold by about 30 points in batting average, other then that Reimold is the superior hitter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see Young with a career OPS+ of 99 and Reimold with a career OPS+ of 103.

I see Reimold as someone who can steal a base if they need to.

I see Reimold as having a career ISO of .188, Young is at .141.

I see Reimold as having a career walk rate of 9.3%, Young is at 4.2%.

Young has Reimold by about 30 points in batting average, other then that Reimold is the superior hitter.

I don't think citing career stats is too meaningful for Reimold given how little time he has spent on the field the last few years. I'm not saying there's no chance he can be better than Young, just that I have no idea what he's capable of, or whether he can stay on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think citing career stats is too meaningful for Reimold given how little time he has spent on the field the last few years. I'm not saying there's no chance he can be better than Young, just that I have no idea what he's capable of, or whether he can stay on the field.

Frobby, jtschrei said that the two were similar hitters and then I responded. How else exactly was I supposed to respond to jtschrei's post? You think I should have used just last season? How would that have been useful?

Now we all know I am a Reimold fan and want Young off the team, with that out of the way I think my comparison, which once again was in response to jtschrei's post, was fair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I am a Reimold fan, too, but I think the prudent thing is to start him in Niegolk and see how he does, then bring him up when someone on the roster gets hurt or falters badly -- if he's showing he's better than Urrutia and Alvarez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I am a Reimold fan, too, but I think the prudent thing is to start him in Niegolk and see how he does, then bring him up when someone on the roster gets hurt or falters badly -- if he's showing he's better than Urrutia and Alvarez.

He should do well in Niegolk. Isn't that in middle earth, somewhere near the shire? Those guys have no putaway pitch. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Awesome research, thanks. I was a fan in 1974 but had forgotten that string of five shutouts.  This last two weeks of rotation excellence (and your list) is giving me flashbacks to the summer of love (1967), when I started to make game logs to savor the strings of shutouts and low-hit gems by Oriole starters. Looking back now at the game logs kept by Baseball-Reference (manually, without your sorting skills!), it's hard to identify exactly which streak so impressed my teenage fan-meter, or even which year. Certainly 1968 was all about low scoring league-wide.  Maybe it was the stretch 22-27 May 1967 featuring Phoebus, Bertaina, Barber, McNally, and Phoebus again (good old 4-man rotation!), including three scoreless outings. Or Hardin and Brabender joining Phoebus, McNally and Palmer from 15 to 20 September, 1967. What about 1969, with Cuellar, Lopez and Leonhard joining the previous cast of McNally, Phoebus, and Hardin, twirling 10 starts (13-22 June) while allowing only 12 runs.  Anyway, it feels rather historic to see this run of high-end pitching from an Orioles rotation. Here's a chart to recap the numbers on this streak in progress... Date Starter IP H ER ERA (14 G) totals: 81.67 59 19 2.09 21-Apr Irvin 6.2 4 0   22-Apr Suarez 5.2 4 0   23-Apr Rodriguez 4.1 11 7   24-Apr Kremer 5.1 3 2   26-Apr Burnes 6 3 1   27-Apr Irvin 7 4 0   28-Apr Suarez 4 7 4   29-Apr Rodriguez 5.2 5 0   30-Apr Kremer 7 4 2   1-May Burnes 6 4 2   2-May Bradish 4.2 4 1   3-May Irvin 6.1 2 0   4-May Means 7 3 0   5-May Kremer 6 1 0  
    • Somehow feels typical of Orioles to play up to the competition, and get burned by the pretenders... same with individual starting pitchers. 
    • It was very obvious ...he would also take a look at his hand frequently. On Saturday, watching a clip in the dugout after one of the HR's, Kremer went to give a high five, pulled back and took a look at his hand. I thought it strange, and I thought something was off. He always appeared to be one of the more enthusiastic celebrators. It would seem the coaches would notice and probably did, but thought nothing of it. Certainly didn't affect his game.
    • Umpire really tried to screw us on Saturday.     
    • I heard someone call it The Great American Smallpark.
    • I just looked thru their record a while ago.  Series against the Nats (2), White Sox, Marlins, Cardinals, Rockies and Angels makes their record of 1 win better than the O's way less impressive.  Their schedule coming up must be hell.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...