Jump to content

The This Team IS Done, We are Dumb and Nothing can Fix it MEGA THREAD


MagicBird

Recommended Posts

Yeah; sorry. I was referring to international acquisitions in the same manner as the baseball industry, media, and fan bases. And I forgot insinuating that as a worthwhile approach to talent acquisition is deemed laughable by a vocal few.

Certainly not by me. We all know Andy MacPhail hated the Dominican republic. As a fiscally sound method of acquiring players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I don't disagree with Stotle. In fact, I think he's right. And yet, I think he'd say the Orioles have been doing things the wrong way for quite some time. It is quite interesting that between MacPhail and Duquette they've managed to turn a perrenial loser into a 3 year consecutive winner. You can only put so much of that success on the poor draft position we were in. I would prefer a more aggressive approach at the amateur and international level but the Orioles have definitely decided that spending lots o money on lottery tickets is not the way they want to go. And yet, you have to admire the luck/skill in picking up a players like Paredes, Miguel Gonzalez, Chen, Schoop. Those are 4 "international players", 2 signed for peanuts, one bought for peanuts and one on the relatively cheap.

I think Duquette is very skilled. I think he has had the fortune of a couple of questionable decisions working out and has also benefitted from struggles/misfortune of some divisional competition. I also think he would be running things differently if he had complete freedom to do what he wants to do.

To be clear, my issues with the Duquette front office almost all come down to the fact I don't think it is a sustainable approach to organization building. I think he has been very impressive in keeping a very solid club on the field and I think he is a very bright baseball mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would prefer a more aggressive approach at the amateur and international level but the Orioles have definitely decided that spending lots o money on lottery tickets is not the way they want to go.

I don't need/want to see dump trucks full of money spent on 16 year old international players. I would just like to see more aggressive scouting and an occasional "this is a potential impact guy we LOVE and are making sure we are a big player for him." But that is not on Duquette.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its sad that many O's fans after rooting for their team for many years don't understand their team. The O's are a mid market team that is not going to spend 4/40 on a closer like Miller or 4/57 on a 34 year old Cruz. Its just not who the O's are.

Miller not only wanted a big payday but also wanted a team that had the resources to pay his teammates big money. That gives the Yankees a decided edge. If the O's had matched the offer or even offered more Miller would have still have went to the Yanks.

Cruz getting better at 33-35 years old suggests that he is probably juicing. Does that affect last until the is 38 or does his body start to break down? The O's can't take a 14M per year risk on that. Besides if the O's had Cruz, Paredes would probably not get the playing time is he getting.

Yes, the O's need to get better. They did last June through October. Maybe they will again. But even if they don't O's fans should know the team they are rooting for and understand why they do what they do. That includes Stan the Fan if he really said what is mentioned in your post.

I was quoting Stan the Fan who I hold in high regard. If you lose Cruz, Miller and Nick, when the team is in position to be a contender, you have to make an effort to replace their production. We miss Nick?s defense and on base percentage, Cruz?s bat, and Miller is the best reliever in baseball. We did NOTHING to replace their production. We went in with a flawed theory of Manny and Wieters returning. For that theory to be successful the team would have to go through the entire 2015 season with no injuries. We have gone from being on the cusp of a championship, to a team that through the first 29 games appears to have numerous flaws. People keep up bringing up the economics of the three free agents, and the club not being able to afford them. I will go with argument. My point is you just can?t lose three players of that caliber and replace them with a rule 5 pick, Travis Snyder, and I don?t know who they were planning to fill the void left by Cruz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was quoting Stan the Fan who I hold in high regard. If you lose Cruz, Miller and Nick, when the team is in position to be a contender, you have to make an effort to replace their production. We miss Nick?s defense and on base percentage, Cruz?s bat, and Miller is the best reliever in baseball. We did NOTHING to replace their production. We went in with a flawed theory of Manny and Wieters returning. For that theory to be successful the team would have to go through the entire 2015 season with no injuries. We have gone from being on the cusp of a championship, to a team that through the first 29 games appears to have numerous flaws. People keep up bringing up the economics of the three free agents, and the club not being able to afford them. I will go with argument. My point is you just can?t lose three players of that caliber and replace them with a rule 5 pick, Travis Snyder, and I don?t know who they were planning to fill the void left by Cruz.

Ultimately Dan tried to field the best team he could with the budget constraints he had while not sacraficing notable prospects and future payroll flexibility. That involved bringing back the core of a team that won 96 games and counting on some guys to rebound from injury and/or production. That we were just going to replace Cruz's MVP caliber production was not going to happen when Cruz went beyond 3 years. The goal was clearly to gap the offensive production as much as possible with platoon players, bouncebacks and depth. I'm fine with disagreements about not retaining certain players like Matusz, Norris, Hunter etc, or even keeping Miller under our likely payroll constraints and him likely costing 4/40 plus (even though think most of this Miller stuff is Monday morning quarterbacking).

Offenses are better this year in the division and our pitching and defense has not been very good to date. That can change and we can still be a competitive team. A competitive team was the goal, not a better one. That's reality.

This notion that every team that is "close" can easily improve itself each year is pure fiction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paredes WAR is 1.1 through this year. I can't figure out how to see Cruz's through this point last year.

The sample sizes and type of question that you are asking is so small and has no predictive value anyway that is plenty close enough. This is not real statistical data that means anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sample sizes and type of question that you are asking is so small and has no predictive value anyway that is plenty close enough. This is not real statistical data that means anything.

I'm not saying Paredes will replace Cruz, I just mean that so far, we have replaced his production from that spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Snider has been worth more than Markakis. Lets not distort too many facts. If the argument is we didn't replace Miller and Cruz fine, but Markakis has been replaced.

Defensively Snider compared to Markakis is a major downgrade. Not even close. We will see where we end up at the end of the year. There is a lot of season left. Right now the lack of trying to make improvements to the team from outside the organization has landed us in last place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • He'll go back to pulling pitches and hit 30 HRs there.
    • I tend to agree with this.  We certainly aren't the best farm system any more and it's time to use Uncle Dave's money some.  I'm in favor of buying the pitching we need.  There are some good FA arms out there.  If there's a bat on another team they want to trade for that's different since the FA position player list isn't good.
    • This what I think happens too.  We'll trade from the FV 40ish tier not the 45 or higher tier.  And I can see dealing from the top ofthe deck (i.e. Mounty, Urias, Kremer*...) to build the ceiling of the pipeljne or weaker/thinner positions.  *A Kremer based deal would be predicated on an FA SP signing.  I don't see it happening but it's an interesting case study.
    • Maybe he should be a free agent target this offseason. 
    • Hays hit .354 / .404 / .537 against LH pitching this season. I would absolutely take him back as a platoon player who can fill in all three OF positions. Given the number of southpaws other teams throw against us we'd be nuts not to consider signing him if he gets DFA'd. 
    • I went and checked how we compared to other playoff teams in platooning and pinch-hitting during the playoffs.  I used the first two wildcard games as the sample to keep it apples to apples with the Orioles’ experience.  For the 8 wildcard teams, I counted the number of line-up changes from game 1 to game 2 and the number of pinch hit PAs and added them together.  For lineup changes, I didn’t consider batting order or positions, only the number of hitters that started game 1 but didn’t start game 2 (only McCann for the Orioles). The Orioles were middle of the pack - 4th highest moves among the 8 wildcard teams. #       Team                Lineup changes Pinch hits PAs Total        T1 Tigers 3 5 8            T1 Astros 1 7 8 3 Mets 1 6 7 4 Orioles 1 5 6 5 Royals 1 4 5 6 Braves 1 2 3 7 Brewers 1 1 2 8 Padres 0 0 0 For some additional context, only the Orioles and Tigers faced different-handed starters the first two games AND had opposing pitcher handedness change at least 5 times in those games. Teams that faced same-hand starter both days: Royals Astros Mets Braves   Number times opposing pitcher handedness changed in game: Astros - 8 Royals - 8 Orioles - 5 Tigers - 5 Mets - 4 Padres - 3 Braves - 2 Brewers - 1 
    • If Hays is non tendered he will be looking for the team that will play him full time.     And he might find it.   He in not even 30 yet.   But the O's don't have that to offer him.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...