Jump to content

Caleb says that the rest he gets from Wieters return help keep him strong.


wildcard

Recommended Posts

I wrote this two weeks ago basically. Joseph's batting line on a day of rest (catching with at least one calendar day off in between) is currently .306/.358/.500/.858

It's a small sample size, only 18 games and 62 AB, but he also hit a teeny bit better last year on days of rest and he cratered in September when he started reaching a career high in games caught.

Not sure if anything is there, but so far he isn't wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems that the number 2 catcher (on all teams) will become more and more important in the future. Guys like Teagarden, a once a week type may be history. Number 1 catchers may be reduced to 100-110 games a season. I have always been a bit tepid about Wieters, the more I see him upon his return, the more I'd like him to be resigned. I know it won't happen, but I'd much prefer him to Davis and MW could do some 1B duty too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was going to make a thread hypothesizing this very thing, but Caleb has preemptively addressed it. This is not your normal backup. I think Buck finds a way to get him 2-3 games a week and he shines now that he's not carrying the catching duties on his back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joseph has really turned his offensive game around since last year. I remember Buck saying that he has hit everyone he has been, give him some time....man, was he right.

I would be quite happy with Joseph as our full-time catcher next year. I just think we need a solid backup to spell him and keep him fresh.

Love me some Celeb!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joseph has really turned his offensive game around since last year. I remember Buck saying that he has hit everyone he has been, give him some time....man, was he right.

I would be quite happy with Joseph as our full-time catcher next year. I just think we need a solid backup to spell him and keep him fresh.

Love me some Celeb!

I liked Nick Hundley. Myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I liked Nick Hundley. Myself.

Hundley was/is really good in that catch half the games role. I'm not surprised that Caleb said this. When he said was happy MW was back, you could tell he was wearing down. Looking towards next year, Joseph and Clevenger should give us areally good, cheap production.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hundley was/is really good in that catch half the games role. I'm not surprised that Caleb said this. When he said was happy MW was back, you could tell he was wearing down. Looking towards next year, Joseph and Clevenger should give us areally good, cheap production.

Right. I'm thrilled with how Matt has done since his return and I'm willing to accept that he brings some intangible to the clubhouse and dugout.

(But) as far as straight catching goes, I would be very happy with Caleb and Clev next season, assuming that Clevenger maintains the gains that he reportedly has made defensively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I'm lost for words about why Rutschman struggled, other than as I've long said he's a catcher and you're not going to get a MOO monster bat playing 110 games behind the plate- but the overall outcome of the team was within what I thought was reasonable, if a bit on the low end. Regarding the depth, Holliday and Mayo are more talented than Urias, but if we had gotten rid of Urias, Mateo, and Mountcastle to hand them spots, this team would have been worse for it, and maybe not even make the playoffs. Urias is good.  Mountcastle is good.  They're not "everyday" players according to your definition, but we have exactly one of those guys.  That doesn't mean every one else is " not good." I wouldn't be surprised to see all three back next year.  I wouldn't be surprised if they moved on from 2-3 of them.  Though I think the former is far wiser than the latter, though it depends on a lot of other things.
    • My post is coming off the wrong way.  The OP I quoted seemed like you were “lost for words” about why the team struggled the way they did. All I’m saying is I think you are like that because you didn’t see the scenarios where this much of a drop off from last year was going to happen. And btw, the depth (to me at least) wasn’t a good thing.  Depth is good when the players are good. If not, they are just guys blocking better talent.
    • But we have no idea who told her or of the info is good. She has given no reason to believe her. Im sure someone told her something but im not sure she smart enough to be able to tell the difference between good info and bad info.
    • I'm a big fan.  It doesn't mean I have sources in the clubhouse. Do we have any idea who her sources are?  Does she have any kind of track record of having reliable sources?
    • I don't know who this woman is and I don't do Twitter. And this is what I touched on in the other thread: I don't know what the best path forward is b/c I don't know exactly what the problem is. I don't think Hyde needs to go, but if this is true- and I have no idea if it is or not- he should be gone. The talk of veteran leaders brings questions.  What was insufficient of the leadership of Satandaner, Mullins, Burnes, and Kimbrel?  
    • Sig for me is notably rigorous trying to combat this.    I feel pretty sure he had a say in crafting his very geeky title, a reflection of his personal brand. We'll see how it goes here if it becomes recommending Adam Frazier and Kyle Gibson as correct for the roster once again.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...