Jump to content

So who wants Baldelli?


HoodGuy007

Recommended Posts

Looks like the Rhode Island stallion is injured again...

Tampa Bay No. 3 hitter Rocco Baldelli left midgame with potentially troubling tightness in his right hamstring. Baldelli, sidelined into June last season with hamstring problems that popped up around the same time of spring, said he won't know the seriousness of this situation until he gets out of bed today.

-- St. Petersburg Times

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/scorecard/03/21/truth.rumors.mlb/1.html

I suggest we trade Chris Ray and Garrett Olson for a hampster... it may stay healthy longer ;):D:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 188
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I think a better point of conversation in that article is

A woman accused of stalking Brewers' announcer Bob Uecker for nearly a decade

What, why, umm just plain funny :D Loved him in the Major league movies ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stick him in LF and he will stay healthier. His hamstring issue has to be conditioning related. Why the DRays don't give him an offseason workout to avoid this is beyond me. Maddon seems to think he can go in a couple days but Baldelli is more pessimistic.

I'd still rather have him than Payton in LF and would still deal Ray and someone else for him. With all these injury concerns, his price keeps dropping, so it may not even take Penn included in the deal to get him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

125 games of Baldelli would be better than 162 of Payton.

Can you prove it statistically? :D

Actually, I'm not joking entirely. I'm genuinely curious what the stats say about Baldelli spending 40 games hurt vs. Payton at full-strength all season. I wouldn't even know where to begin to compare statistics, Jon, so I'm interested to know if you were being facetious or for real.

It's worth pointing out, though, that Baldelli doesn't bring NEARLY the amount of veteran leadership to this clubhouse as Jay Payton. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you prove it statistically? :D

Actually, I'm not joking entirely. I'm genuinely curious what the stats say about Baldelli spending 40 games hurt vs. Payton at full-strength all season. I wouldn't even know where to begin to compare statistics, Jon, so I'm interested to know if you were being facetious or for real.

It's worth pointing out, though, that Baldelli doesn't bring NEARLY the amount of veteran leadership to this clubhouse as Jay Payton. ;)

Prepare yourself for some mind blowing math.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you prove it statistically? :D

Actually, I'm not joking entirely. I'm genuinely curious what the stats say about Baldelli spending 40 games hurt vs. Payton at full-strength all season. I wouldn't even know where to begin to compare statistics, Jon, so I'm interested to know if you were being facetious or for real.

It's worth pointing out, though, that Baldelli doesn't bring NEARLY the amount of veteran leadership to this clubhouse as Jay Payton. ;)

Sigh! So many veteran leaders, so few Rookies to lead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you prove it statistically? :D

Actually, I'm not joking entirely. I'm genuinely curious what the stats say about Baldelli spending 40 games hurt vs. Payton at full-strength all season. I wouldn't even know where to begin to compare statistics, Jon, so I'm interested to know if you were being facetious or for real.

It's worth pointing out, though, that Baldelli doesn't bring NEARLY the amount of veteran leadership to this clubhouse as Jay Payton. ;)

I'm not going to go through all that again, but we had a discussion about JD Drew when the Sox signed him. I did some back-of-the-envelope calculations and I figured that 110 games of Drew at his career OPS, plus 50 games of a random, below-average OF like Jay Gibbons or Jason Dubois was about the same as 160 games of a .850 or .875 player like Carlos Lee. This wasn't a super-detailed analysis, but close enough for gov't work.

This almost certainly holds true for Baldelli (likely OPS in the mid .800s) and Payton (in the low-mid .700s).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you prove it statistically? :D

Actually, I'm not joking entirely. I'm genuinely curious what the stats say about Baldelli spending 40 games hurt vs. Payton at full-strength all season. I wouldn't even know where to begin to compare statistics, Jon, so I'm interested to know if you were being facetious or for real.

It's worth pointing out, though, that Baldelli doesn't bring NEARLY the amount of veteran leadership to this clubhouse as Jay Payton. ;)

It is actually pretty easy to do.

First of all, you see what Baldelli's normal production is and assume you get that for 125 games.

Then, you figure out who starts the other 37 games in LF and go from there. So, it will depend upon who starts out there(in this case, it would be Payton himself). You then, take those 2 figures and compare them against Payton alone.

Using WARP3, Baldelli was worth .5 win more than payton last year..However, WARP3 is a counting stat..In other words, his injuries hurt his WARP3 number. He accumulated a WARP3 figure of 4.4 in only 88 games and 364 ab's. Payton accumulated a WARP3 number of 3.9 in 557 abs and 142 games.

So, Baldelli is far ahead of Payton in terms of production...Probably anywhere from 3-5 wins better(if they both played a full compliment of games) and that is before you account for Baldelli getting better.

So, Baldelli for 125 games + Payton for 37 games is probably worth anywhere from 4-8 wins more than Payton for 162 games....Of coruse these numbers can vary slightly if you platoon and stuff like that but you get the idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to go through all that again, but we had a discussion about JD Drew when the Sox signed him. I did some back-of-the-envelope calculations and I figured that 110 games of Drew at his career OPS, plus 50 games of a random, below-average OF like Jay Gibbons or Jason Dubois was about the same as 160 games of a .850 or .875 player like Carlos Lee. This wasn't a super-detailed analysis, but close enough for gov't work.

This almost certainly holds true for Baldelli (likely OPS in the mid .800s) and Payton (in the low-mid .700s).

Cool. Makes sense. "Back of the envelope" was all I was looking for.

Down with Payton! In with Rocco!!!! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Yeah I think they need to staggar the lefties in the rotation order. R-R-L-R-L like that.
    • Trading Mayo Kjerstad and Povich for one guy to become a relief pitcher is nuts.
    • We don't need starting pitchers. We need Relief Pitchers. We don't need average Relief Pitchers, we need consistent high leverage/high K Relief Pitchers.
    • If you feel comfortable putting Aiken and Baker (or even Tate) in during an elimination series, that's your prerogative. But I do not. Too inconsistent, which is the same reason why Mike Baumann pitched himself off the active roster. when spot was needed for returning starters off the IL. Currently Coulombe is on IL so we can't even count on one of our best. Cano has regressed from last season. We've also witnessed last season how Webb broke down from over use and was ineffective in the playoff series against Texas. Perez goes in streaks of either really good or concernedly bad (he loses his command). Akin's problem is he leaves the ball over the heart of the plate and he doesn't have good enough stuff to get away with it. They're meatballs. We might get some good times from Baker now that he's up, but I would only expect a month or 2 at best from him before he returns to old habits. And Suarez is a starter who wants to be a starter. Who knows if he will go back to the bullpen? He'll have to go deeper into games if he wants to stay in the rotation, otherwise, I think he should be in the bullpen. But that's not what he is right now in this moment. He's a starter with a ERA in the 1s.
    • It's pretty hard to say definitively that the bolded is true.  It might be, but there's also the loss in ability you have to account for.  30 year olds are slower than 26 year olds too.  Maybe their game knowledge and practice have made it so they can overcome the meager loss in bat speed/athleticism over that time span.  But the picture is a bit muddy.   I also don't think the aging issue is limited to people in their mid-late 30s.  Bat speed peaks at like 24 or 25 based on the data we have right now on it, and after 31 starts falling off fairly fast.  Obviously this is population data and individuals are likely to see different curves.   But outside of the stars that have a lot of ability to lose, it's becoming pretty clear that once you hit your early 30s it's pretty hard to maintain your skills without all the "help" that is extensively tested for.   I think that even for early-30s players teams are much more willing to drop them over giving them expensive market-rate deals, especially since they can abuse young talent so readily.
    • After a really dumb day at work, this was an absolutely delightful read. Seeing a diamond expert and a can of corn detonate a yoked PBA pro was absolutely wonderful. I love this website. 
    • If you pitch Bradish on 5 days rest you'd pitch Rodriguez on 3 days rest?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...