Jump to content

Is Steve Pearce Starting to Hit?


Aristotelian

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Oops, computer freaked out.

Slowly but surely, his AVG has climbed from a low of .176 in mid-May to .232 at present. His last few starts:

2 for 4

1 for 3

1 for 2 (2B, BB)

1 for 4

2 for 4, 2B

0 for 2

3 for 5, 2 x 3B

0 for 2, HBP

1 for 4, #B

1 for 3

3 for 5

1 for 4

Problem is, with the opt out guys playing time is scarce. Does anyone want to see more of Pearce, less of Parmelee, even against LHP?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you split Pearce's season into nearly two halves, at-bats-wise, he's hit .274/.330/.464 in the second half (84 ABs), incl. all three of his home runs. I think he's back, the O's believe in him, and are just seeing how the Parmalee experiment goes for two-three weeks more at most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I had a nickle for the number of times someone has said this to me among my circle of friends/O's fans I could certainly buy myself a nice refreshing Slurpee on this steamy day. Until it happens with great consistency not buying in

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buck is playing him the way he should and against the left handers. He hasdone nothing vs right handers and needs to be platooned. Even last year were he was decent vs right handers he was much better vs the lefties. Now the question is can Parmalee and Snider ht well enough to platoon with him or will Buck have to start playing him more against right handers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is such a thing as a second half player. And remember Pierce was DFA'D last year he was that bad before June.

Is there? I would be very surprised if there were more than a random scattering of examples of healthy players who consistently hit better in one half or the other. Maybe with a handful of exceptions for fatigue, especially among catchers, or maybe pre-lights Cubs. I can't imagine a reason why a player would take three months to get going every year. Of course with a large enough sample (say, 144 years of MLB history) you'll find some small number of players who regularly hit better in any situation. I'm sure you can find a few examples of players who clearly hit better on Tuesdays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I usually pay no mind to the rep system and don't use it myself, but the fact that I got neg-repped for this is hilarious, petty, sad, and puts to rest any "there are no factions on this forum" talk.

Huh, that feels like a mistake to me. Was there a negative comment to go along with it? I have had a couple negative reps that were intended to be positive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there? I would be very surprised if there were more than a random scattering of examples of healthy players who consistently hit better in one half or the other. Maybe with a handful of exceptions for fatigue, especially among catchers, or maybe pre-lights Cubs. I can't imagine a reason why a player would take three months to get going every year. Of course with a large enough sample (say, 144 years of MLB history) you'll find some small number of players who regularly hit better in any situation. I'm sure you can find a few examples of players who clearly hit better on Tuesdays.

For the same reason, I hate it when any commentator or statistical overlay mentions a player's hitting or pitching results lifetime against one team. Of all the arbitrary numbers thrown around, that's got to be one of the most meaningless. You might as well talk about the hitter's lifetime batting average against pitchers who are progressive Democrats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Slowly but surely, his AVG has climbed from a low of .176 in mid-May to .232 at present. His last few starts:

2 for 4

1 for 3

1 for 3 (2B)

I don't know, I think Pearce had his career year last year and has settled back into who he really is.

Ala Bud Norris.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
    • This is exactly what EDC said tonight     
    • My guess is more of a safety profile than they preferred. They clearly wanted Wiggins. They ran that pick up fast. And then when you listen to the press conference, the love for the player was obvious.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...