Jump to content

Orioles trade Davies for Parra. Your verdict?


PaulFolk

Do you like the Davies for Parra trade?  

193 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you like the Davies for Parra trade?

    • I approve. A small price to pay to fix the O's OF hole with a quality veteran.
    • I disapprove. The O's gave up up a pitching prospect for a rental who won't move the needle.

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

This is a Duquette kind of trade. A moderately talented, moderately-projected prospect for a pretty good short-term guy. Not a fan of rentals. There is risk here. Parra is not going to guarantee a playoff spot in any way. But in the end it's probably a trade of a couple wins for a guy who's not going to be an impact talent in the majors. Probably. Interested if they want to try to resign Parra, but that really has no impact on the trade.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Parra OPS/month career:

Apr: .708

May: .762

Jun: .757

Jul: .766

Aug: .689

Sep : .730

His present .880 is not supported by his career numbers, and Aug/Sep have historically been his worst months.

I'll guess we get .700 -.725 for our 60 game rental

Monthly splits generally have no predictive value. It is true that he's not likely to be a .880 guy from now on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we could lock up Parra in the offseason' date=' I think this is a great trade. What would it take? 3/33, 4/40? Overpay, underpay?[/quote']

Could we not have signed him the off-season without the trade? Whether we extend him or not, in the end, we traded for 2 months of him. They trade should be judge based purely on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could we not have signed him the off-season without the trade? Whether we extend him or not' date=' in the end, we traded for 2 months of him. They trade should be judge based purely on that.[/quote']Disagree. If they traded for him with the intention of signing him, then whether they sign him should absolutely factor into the trade.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the move only if Parra can get the Orioles into the playoffs. I still approve of the deal last year to get Andrew Miller. Sure both are rentals but both are big pieces to a team that is in a WIN NOW mode and minor league pitchers are a dime a dozen. I'll take the proven ML player every time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we could lock up Parra in the offseason' date=' I think this is a great trade. What would it take? 3/33, 4/40? Overpay, underpay?[/quote']

The trade and any potential extension have little or nothing to do with one another. All this gets the O's is an exclusive negotiating period. Parra is a 2-win player, and you have to assume decline. So let's say his next three years are (optimistically) something like 2.5, 2, 1.5 wins for a total of six wins. At $7M per win that gives you 3/42. That's probably around what he's looking for. Major risks are that he's overachieving on BABIP this year, and his defensive metrics have fallen off a cliff recently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Completely disagree. You've traded for two months of him, plus a negotiating window. I wouldn't pay $50 and a goat for the window.

This doesn't make much sense to me. If they sign him before he hits free agency, it's a direct result of the trade. If would have been impossible without the trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a Duquette kind of trade. A moderately talented, moderately-projected prospect for a pretty good short-term guy. Not a fan of rentals. There is risk here. Parra is not going to guarantee a playoff spot in any way. But in the end it's probably a trade of a couple wins for a guy who's not going to be an impact talent in the majors. Probably. Interested if they want to try to resign Parra, but that really has no impact on the trade.

This is how I see it as well. I just don't see the O's having a realistic shot at the post-season, so that makes the move a negative for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This doesn't make much sense to me. If they sign him before he hits free agency, it's a direct result of the trade. If would have been impossible without the trade.

Why would he agree to a deal he couldn't have gotten in free agency? If they do extend it will be at free agent market costs. So, there is no difference. The trade is for 2 months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disagree. If they traded for him with the intention of signing him, then whether they sign him should absolutely factor into the trade.

You could sign him in the off-season without trading for him. Trading Davies had nothing to do with signing him. The trade was only so you can get him for 2 months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...