Jump to content

People getting a little too emotional about Schoop's game


winkies

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I'm much more mad at Dickerson for sending Hardy. The tying run would have been coming to the plate, Hardy is extremely slow, and it looks like he is limping a little to me. Don't send him!

Bill James has made the point that with two outs, it makes sense to send the runner if you have about a one in three chance to make it. Hardy sure did look slow there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bill James has made the point that with two outs, it makes sense to send the runner if you have about a one in three chance to make it. Hardy sure did look slow there.

With an average runner, I would agree. It seems like Hardy has been thrown out multiple times this year at the plate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm more mad at Dickerson for sending Hardy. The tying run would have been coming to the plate, Hardy is extremely slow, and it looks like he is limping a little to me. Don't send him!

I agree about the limping. I see that, too.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm more mad at Dickerson for sending Hardy. The tying run would have been coming to the plate, Hardy is extremely slow, and it looks like he is limping a little to me. Don't send him!

Man, I have got to agree. It was the most baffling send that I've seen in years. He wasn't close and you knew that the moment Hardy rounded 3B.

I told a friend a week ago that every step he takes looks like he is coming up with a pulled hamstring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bill James has made the point that with two outs, it makes sense to send the runner if you have about a one in three chance to make it. Hardy sure did look slow there.
With an average runner, I would agree. It seems like Hardy has been thrown out multiple times this year at the plate.

I didn't see the play in question, but if you're never getting thrown out you're leaving runs on the table. The max efficiency point is not 0% outs on the bases; that would mean you're so conservative that you're probably costing more runs being careful than you would be by getting thrown out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't see the play in question, but if you're never getting thrown out you're leaving runs on the table. The max efficiency point is not 0% outs on the bases; that would mean you're so conservative that you're probably costing more runs being careful than you would be by getting thrown out.

I had a good view of the fielder and the runner. I thought Hardy was dead unless there was a bad throw. Ball was not hit very deep, fielder coming in and lined up with the plate. On the other hand, Hardy was fully extended and making pretty good speed (for Hardy). All in all, though, my thought as the play developed was that Hardy was dead meat unless there was a bad throw/missed catch or tag. But, what do I know? Bad throws happen, after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He went 0-4. Ok what do you expect? Schoop isn't a .300 hitter, regression is expected.

He made a poor throw and dropped a ball. It happens.

Remember Jim Johnson blew the entire 2012 season? When Schoop does something like that I can understand it a little.

Who are these "people"? Maybe I missed it around here, but who was tearing up Schoop? Schoop had a rotten night last night and it probably help contribute to a loss, but I think pretty much every real fan that follows the game closely knows that happens on occasion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">More notes and quotes on the Orioles' defense - School of Roch: The Orioles entered last night with the lowes... <a href="http://t.co/DxZ179Yz48">http://t.co/DxZ179Yz48</a></p>— Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="

">August 19, 2015</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

On his error in the ninth, the ball simply popped out of his glove as he took Manny Machado's throw on the expected 5-4-3 double play. It appeared to handcuff him. The Mets eventually loaded the bases with no outs and scored twice on a sacrifice fly and Brad Brach's wild pitch.

http://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2015/08/more-notes-and-quotes-on-the-orioles-defense.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Schoop: "I?ve got to play better. Some easy mistakes that I do today that I?ve got to be better for my teammates and better for myself."</p>— Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="

">August 19, 2015</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • It's fine, but I would personally prefer having Cowser and Adley taking tons of pitches back-to-back before Gunnar further punishes the opposing starting pitcher with high exit velo barrels. 
    • I was going to say pretty much the same thing about Cowser in my post, but left out my thoughts to keep the post more Gunnar-centric. But I totally agree that Cowser fits the best as this team's leadoff hitter, especially since Holliday doesn't look like he's going to make an impact offensively as early as most of us thought heading into the season.  Going back to last season, I've said Cowser has the best mix of patience, hit tool, power, and speed to be a great leadoff hitter. The strikeouts are most likely always going to be high with him, but he has .380-.400+ OBP makeup, and having someone like that hitting leadoff with Adley and Gunnar hitting directly behind Cowser is going to set things up for an elite offense which is much more dynamic and less one-dimensional than the what we've seen up until this point. Cowser Adley Gunnar Westburg O'Hearn Santander Mountcastle Is an ideal top 7 against RHP for right now, with Kjerstad (replacing Hays) and Mayo (essentially replacing Mateo and bumping Westburg to 2B) making the lineup legitimately scary within the next couple months. Mullins and Hays need to be phased out, with Santander and Mountcastle not far behind if those two continue struggling and not reaching base enough to justify hitting in the middle of the order.
    • A lot of teams (likely driven by analytics) are putting their best overall hitter at 2 (like the Yankees batting Soto 2, and the Dodgers batting Shohei 2) to maximize ABs while guaranteeing that a high-OBP guy is batting in front of him to give him opportunities with men on base.  That's probably what we want.  It seems logical considering how thoroughly debunked small-ball in the first inning has been.  Rutschman at 3 is fine.
    • Realistically I think Adley as the leadoff guy is the best lineup for us but if he has trouble batting leadoff in half the games because he can't get his catcher's gear off fast enough then I get it.   Cowser has continued to be incredibly patient, and if Adley can't be our leadoff guy then Cowser is probably our next best option.  Of course Cowser also hits a lot of bombs, so it'd be interesting if he goes on another heater.   If Cowser gets off the schneid then Cowser leadoff and Gunnar at 2 could be incredibly potent.  I don't think Cowser is actually playing that badly, he's just been running into some bad luck.  And he's starting to wake up a little bit anyway.
    • Agreed, appreciate the stats. Gunnar isn't a leadoff hitter - he's a prototypical #3 hitter or cleanup hitter. Hyde writes poor lineups, and Gunnar hitting leadoff has been one of the consistent problems with the offense this season. Gunnar hitting mostly solo shots is both a consequence and reflection of this offense's flaws - the O's have too many low-OBP hitters in the lineup (hitting in less-than-optimal spots for the most part) and are too reliant on solo homers to generate runs. At least Hyde has started hitting Westburg leadoff against LHP, which is progress, but Hyde is way too stubborn and too slow to make the correct adjustments. He's very similar to Buck Showalter in that respect.  Anyway, I look forward to Hyde waking up and moving Gunnar down to #3/#4 against RHP.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...