Jump to content

Dan's Offseason Moves Part One: Cruz


Bahama O's Fan

Would You Have Signed Cruz to the Deal He Got from Seattle?  

91 members have voted

  1. 1. Would You Have Signed Cruz to the Deal He Got from Seattle?



Recommended Posts

  • Replies 263
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I don't really follow the specifics with respect to what you are citing, but I agree a court will decide if the matter is before it.

Some of the MLB's underhanded dealing with the Baltimore Orioles Baseball club since the filing. Including the Duquette tampering, and the All Star game revocations. Matusz suspension, umpiring crew replacement, removal from the rules committee and finance committee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of the MLB's underhanded dealing with the Baltimore Orioles Baseball club since the filing. Including the Duquette tampering, and the All Star game revocations. Matusz suspension, umpiring crew replacement, removal from the rules committee and finance committee.

I'll have to read up. Seems like a lot of moving parts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Wilpons had dealings with the firm that presented the Nationals' case.

Wilpons were part of the Madoff claw back. They were only permitted to retain partial ownership because of their very close association with Bud Selig.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those three were also in charge of deciding whether MLB should extend a loan? That would be odd for three owners of clubs to have that say. The commissioner's office has finance and compliance folks that generally decide these things.

I am certain they do. The money was funded by the clubs though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's odd that three individuals in charge of making a loan would also be in charge of deciding an arbitration case involving television rights. Who are the three individuals?

They had a vested interest in repayment of the loan. Whether they were the individuals signing off on the loan or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will need to read up because I don't want to say anything that might be misconstrued.

I understand. Most legal minds think that the Orioles pleading will eventually be denied. And that there was purposefully ambiguous language included in the original MASN agreement that the Angelos team misinterpreted. Allowing for a loop hole to be leveraged with a back room agreement. Made between the Lerners and the MLB at the time of their purchase. We will probably never really know. And Bud will probably go to the hall of fame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • First, the had a jump in 23’ given how terrible they had been previously, which conditions many fans in the marketplace not to care. They simple weren’t relevant for years. So one very good regular season will not undue years of being bad/irrelevant and treating your customers terribly. Next, I think they missed an opportunity in the offseason by not doing enough by way of big/bold attention grabbing moves. Now I acknowledge that this was most likely due to the ownership flux/transition. I believe they got an attendance/marketplace engagement boost when they changed owners and when they traded for Burnes. However, I believe we would have seen more engagement attendance with say a big Gunnar extension and/or bringing in a big time FA.   IMO this would have created more buzz before the season (say around the time people make season tix decisions - IMO before Christmas is when some people make those bigger purchases). All of this is to say, that it will take time and effort on the organizations part because of how bad of a stain that the Angeloses left. I still have friends and colleagues who refuse to support the Orioles and attend games due to the damage that was done. Rubenstien & co are not going to be able to undo 30 years of awfulness overnight. But IMO it is not enough to simply call it “a new chapter”. They have to make new/different actions to distinguish themselves from who the Orioles were/used to be under the Angelos regime.
    • Just checking in on Gameday, Yankees looking incredibly vulnerable.  Should be the Os out there.  Super lame.  Whichever team wins this series I hope gets knocked out by CLE or DET.
    • If the franchise were better, the fan base would be too.  It’s been a rough 40 years.
    • It also means we don’t have to trade our prospect capital to acquire him 
    • Machado just hit a 2 run home run off of Yamamoto.  I hope the Orioles young players are taking notes.
    • Yeah it was priced initially the same as the ALDS games, same as last year. Nobody was rushing to pay those prices. And by the time the tickets reached appropriate levels, by the Orioles lowering their prices or the secondary market coming down in price, fans have like 24 hours to figure out their plans to attend a mid afternoon game. It’s just not worth getting upset about — we still had an awesome crowd and the only thing missing was an offense to ignite it. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...