weams Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 Haven't seen any strong rumors on Cespedes or Upton either. Gordon probably goes next. The Angels seem to be real focused on that. http://www.latimes.com/sports/angels/la-sp-angels-eppler-20151212-story.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Il BuonO Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2015/12/cardinals-sign-alex-gordon-unlikely.htmlLooks like the Cards are out on Davis' date=' that leave the question....Who is in?[/quote'] I would note the words,"Obviously, we're always open to adjusting." And then there's this: Holliday and Davis are both represented by Scott Boras; so if Holliday refuses a trade and blocks a Gordon signing, that could theoretically make St. Louis a suitor for Davis if the club is intent on adding another big bat. http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2015/12/nl-central-notes-davis-holliday-walker-lee.html Still, it's hard to see where Boras thinks the market is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frobby Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 The FDA disagrees with your Adderall statement:Adderall is classified as a Schedule II drug because of the potential for abuse and dependence. I stand corrected. I was going off my own two kids' experience, but having looked into this after seeing your post, I was wrong. Adderall can be addictive. Whether Davis was addicicted to it is another story. There is a difference between needing a drug to correct a medical condition, and being addicted to that drug. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NATTYBO's Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 I would note the words,"Obviously, we're always open to adjusting." And then there's this:Holliday and Davis are both represented by Scott Boras; so if Holliday refuses a trade and blocks a Gordon signing, that could theoretically make St. Louis a suitor for Davis if the club is intent on adding another big bat. http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2015/12/nl-central-notes-davis-holliday-walker-lee.html Still, it's hard to see where Boras thinks the market is. Just my opinion but the adjustment part would be if prices come down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskins Rick Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 I stand corrected. I was going off my own two kids' experience, but having looked into this after seeing your post, I was wrong. Adderall can be addictive. Whether Davis was addicicted to it is another story. There is a difference between needing a drug to correct a medical condition, and being addicted to that drug. I know they say its addictive and I am sure to some it is. My own two, they couldn't wait for the school year to be over, so they could spend the summer without popping the pills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Gordo Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 CD is not a bad OF.That was not Boras that had CD in the OF, this past season, that was Buck. Buck said in an interview recently that CD was an OF if need be, "Anybody who thinks he's a full time OF hasn't done their homework" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Gordo Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 The Angels seem to be real focused on that. http://www.latimes.com/sports/angels/la-sp-angels-eppler-20151212-story.html Apparently LAA thinks CD is an OF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskins Rick Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 Buck said in an interview recently that CD was an OF if need be, "Anybody who thinks he's a full time OF hasn't done their homework" I really have trouble buying that statement. When there are other quotes: “Chris might be as good a right fielder as we have here,’’ Showalter said. "I think Chris is going to be a good defender wherever we put him." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number5 Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 I really have trouble buying that statement.When there are other quotes: Do you think that maybe those quotes spoke more to the quality of right fielders on the Orioles' roster last year than to Chris Davis' skills as a right fielder? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskins Rick Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 Do you think that maybe those quotes spoke more to the quality of right fielders on the Orioles' roster last year than to Chris Davis' skills as a right fielder? Davis is a very good athlete and not just a power hitter. he plays above average defense at first Could the kind words, be just because of the current roster, no, I don't buy that. Buck said in some aspects, it was easier to play the OF, then 1st. Buck was saying nice things in ST about what Davis brings to the club, and for him to just switch gears and say Davis doesn't have the ability to play the OF, is something I think has been taken out of context. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number5 Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 Davis is a very good athlete and not just a power hitter.he plays above average defense at first Could the kind words, be just because of the current roster, no, I don't buy that. Buck said in some aspects, it was easier to play the OF, then 1st. Buck was saying nice things in ST about what Davis brings to the club, and for him to just switch gears and say Davis doesn't have the ability to play the OF, is something I think has been taken out of context. Actually, Rick, I think that context is exactly what I am looking at. Chris Davis is an excellent athlete, no doubt, but at the time that Buck said Chris might be the best right fielder that the Orioles had, the team was unquestionably weak in corner outfielders. Likewise, his more recent comment that anyone thinking Cris is as adept in the outfield as first base hasn't been paying attention is based on the context of today's situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McLovin Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 I 100% don't want him to resign. I recall vividly A) his suspension B) 2014 C) his pre-All Star 2015 of .235/.318/.469. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Gordo Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 Looks like STL is out on CD : http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2015/12/cardinals-sign-alex-gordon-unlikely.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamK Posted December 15, 2015 Share Posted December 15, 2015 I wish one of the teams in the draft ahead of us would sign him already. Would it be a bad thing if he doesn't sign with somebody, and they come back to the Orioles for a more realistic offer? More realistic would be great. By then, though, realism may be as welcome as ice cubes down the back of your shirt. 7 is an eternity. 4, at those prices, seems better. 3 would drop him into FA during Armageddon. But to come back to the Os for anything other than a long term deal seems like a long shot to me now. Not enough face saved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonySoprano Posted December 15, 2015 Share Posted December 15, 2015 Now who's being cryptic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.