Jump to content

Wei-Yin Chen to the Marlins (5 yrs - $80M)


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

lol

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I assume Chen's five-year deal with the Marlins pays him $1 in each of the first four years and all the money in year five.</p>? keithlaw (@keithlaw) <a href="

">January 12, 2016</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

That made me lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 183
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Welcome to the era of the opt-out (if there was any doubt before today).

5/80 is about what was projected by the saner voices. Good luck Wei-yin, thanks for four pretty good years.

Yeah, but this isn't a bad opt-out for the team. He is making below market rates for the pre opt-out years, so the only way he exercises it is if he becomes one of the top pitchers in the league and the Marlins still got a great deal of 2/$20M for what would have to be two great years. I can't see him doing better than 3/$60M 2 years from now unless he starts accruing some Cy Young votes.

The opt-out that people complain about is when players are making fair market value and then opt out. Every team in the Majors would be in on Chen for 2/$20M. Not necessarily so for a player making 8/$160M with an opt out after 4 years and 4/$80M remaining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can't keep any of our good players. Angelos need to leave the team.

Chen is either worth 5/$80M or he isn't. I don't think he is, so I have no qualms with this deal. If the O's go into the season with a sub $110 million payroll I will grab a pitchfork with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it does seem that Boras is might think it is time to end the "waiting" game. Even with an opt out he couldn't find a deal for Chen which guaranteed $100 million. May be Chen was tired of waiting who knows for sure but it looks like things are starting to move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Source: Chen deal with <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Marlins?src=hash">#Marlins</a> will be five years, $80M. Does not include no-trade clause. Pending physical.</p>? Ken Rosenthal (@Ken_Rosenthal) <a href="
">January 12, 2016</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I nailed it! From August 27:

I still think he's looking at 5/$80 mm or so.

http://forum.orioleshangout.com/forums/showthread.php/149842-Who-would-you-rank-above-Chen-on-the-list-of-free-agent-starters?p=3903044&highlight=chen#post3903044

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
    • I think Young will be added, and that is it. I like Pham, but no AAA experience makes him unlikely to be taken. Whatever open spots should be used to upgrade the bullpen and other pitching depth. It is well documented here that we don’t have much beyond raw guys like Strowd and Heid. we lack flexibility and options. This has to change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...