-
Who's Online 37 Members, 1 Anonymous, 239 Guests (See full list)
- CTBear
- kidrock
- Hallas
- Sports Guy
- cravens86
- O's84
- ShoelesJoe
- Orioles Jim
- e16bball
- Yossarian
- Can_of_corn
- Bahama O's Fan
- 86this
- now
- Brooks The Great
- adidasdoc
- forphase1
- Gurgi
- sylvester
- 9brady
- jem709
- Il BuonO
- eddie83
- orioles119
- Looch
- yayterps
- kaj21206
- Delbird
- Aristotelian
- paulcoates
- Pushmonkey
- NedFromYork
- Paul in Virginia
- Big Al
- glenn__davis
- EERinthe804
- Obando
Orioles News and Information |
|
Daily Organizational Boxscores |
Orioles Prospect Information |
Statistics |
-
Posts
-
By Can_of_corn · Posted
What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move. The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move. -
By Sports Guy · Posted
I’m saying the Os had an agreement with MLB and that should have held up. Been pretty clear about that. -
By Can_of_corn · Posted
It's hard. You said "the Os were right to fight them in court and why the Nats should have never won.". I want to know why you think that MLB (the Nats) shouldn't have won from a legal standpoint. Or are you just saying they shouldn't have won because it was unfair to the O's? Is that the disconnect? -
By Sports Guy · Posted
🤦♂️ I don’t think you are following what I’m saying. -
By Can_of_corn · Posted
The MASN agreement? That was the bone MLB threw Angelos to avoid court. That has nothing to do with what would have happened if it had gone to court. -
By Sports Guy · Posted
The MASN agreement and the arrangement they had in terms of percentages -
I know you don't move right fielders to third base, but it seems anyone who can play third should be able to learn the outfield, especially if he already has the arm.
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.