Jump to content

Joey Rickard is the real deal


Diehard_O's_Fan

Recommended Posts

First off I don't recall anyone saying he is poor.

Secondly, yea they are in trouble defensively in the outfield.

Poor memory? Check out post #6 this thread "But he can't really throw, defend, walk or hit for power. He's kind of a one dimensional player."
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 184
  • Created
  • Last Reply
After Jimmy Paredes straight up raked for 1/3 of last season before looking like he was swinging a dead fish for the last three months of the season, I'm not going to make any major assessments of Rickard's long-term ability at the plate. He's hot right now and there is probably not much of a book on him. He's taking advantage of it and helping us win games in the present, so I'll ride that train while he's rolling. He's only drawn two walks, but he has shown a good eye at the plate and worked pitchers deep into counts.

Defensively, you can't teach speed or hustle and he certainly has both. He's probably relied on his speed too often throughout his career as an outfielder and that's hurt his development in reading balls off the bat. At worst, he's the outfield equivalent to Flaherty and I'm satisfied with that.

He probably hasn't played enough at any one position to get completely acclimated.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nah I mean, it's fine to call me out on poor word choice or whatever. It's just the endless semantics and dissecting of every single piece of what someone writes around here drives me nuts. I'd love it if there was an OH space other than the game thread where we could just kind of free-jive without the constant threat of analysis and debate.

There is the rant forum.

And some of us come here for analysis and debate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think he's "very good" and I don't think he's "bad". He's looks like an average defender to me, with the ability to get to above-average.
Last night (Wednesday against the Jays), Joey reached for a fly ball and missed. Ooops! But he ran for the ball, gunned it from left field and got the Blue Jay out at the plate. The reasons the fans (including myself) love him is because of his hustle.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha, I don't really think the rant section is what I'm looking for. And I come here for a bit of debate and analysis, too.

Just saying, shouldn't there be some reasonable gray area where it's not really necessary to constantly be like, "WELL ACTUALLY"? It's exhausting. I would hope you don't think I think Joey Rickard could be an elite defender, but now I have to try and convince you of that because I lazily said "a lot" instead of, like, "a bit".

But sure, I could see how that's fun.

The problem is too many argue by Hyperbole. Rickard can field, can't throw, Kim can't hit, etc. That's useless. Precise statements with some reasoning or analysis makes for better discussions.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoops, I didn't know that this thread had been hijacked by an argument over semantics. :confused:

So I'm going to re-hijack it and talk about Joey Rickard. I love the guy, I love his hustle, I love how he ran out the ground ball in the 10th inning and turned it into a single. Though Caleb scored the winning run (he was hustling too), Joey Rickard was named the Player of the Game. And the fans continue to chant "Joey! Joey!" No deep analysis here, just a fan expressing joy at watching a favorite player. :smile11:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoops, I didn't know that this thread had been hijacked by an argument over semantics. :confused:

So I'm going to re-hijack it and talk about Joey Rickard. I love the guy, I love his hustle, I love how he ran out the ground ball in the 10th inning and turned it into a single. Though Caleb scored the winning run (he was hustling too), Joey Rickard was named the Player of the Game. And the fans continue to chant "Joey! Joey!" No deep analysis here, just a fan expressing joy at watching a favorite player. :smile11:

And now he's showing off the "Big League Chew" :cussing:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buck raved about his defense all spring, especially his routes to the ball.

I think Joey Rickard is a good defensive outfielder, but we've haven't seen it yet entirely. Adjustments to the ballparks, the second and third decks, and big league crowds and play in general are all still happening, IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buck raved about his defense all spring, especially his routes to the ball.

I think Joey Rickard is a good defensive outfielder, but we've haven't seen it yet entirely. Adjustments to the ballparks, the second and third decks, and big league crowds and play in general are all still happening, IMHO.

Would you rather have Snider, De Aza or Para back?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I also went with Burnes because of his better durability. Since 2019 Snell has pitched more then 128 innings in a season one time (180 innings in 2023). While Burnes has pitched over 167 inning or more every season since becoming a full time starter in 2021. Burnes is also two years younger so in theory while a six year contract is riskier it would end at the same age as Snell on a four year deal. I'd be happy with either one, but my preference in Burnes.
    • Adding that I would go for Roki over either of them.
    • I'd go for Snell. He has true Cy Young stuff. Burnes is really good but his K rate keeps dropping and the years scare me. The box score for his playoff start was solid but he actually gave up a lot of hard contact. I just don't trust him enough to commit all those years and dollars.
    • I go Burnes because to me the higher floor is very important with this sort of deal. I feel like Snell's skillset is more on a razor's edge-- if you didn't like how Burnes pitched in August, Snell is almost certainly more prone to stretches of poor performance like that. Even if he is more dominant at other times to balance it out. Plus, the extra length of Burnes' deal is offset a bit by being 2 years younger. 
    • Snell is injury prone and Burnes is a tough workhorse.
    • Didn't see the video? The ball went maybe 15 feet before it bounced, it was rolling by the dugout.  It was nothing and the Dodgers look soft. Was he supposed to let the discarded ball stay on the field?
    • Rojas pulled from the bases in the 3rd inning after he couldn't manage 2nd to home on a Mookie single (and Ohtani couldn't 1st to 3rd behind him) as the Dodgers try to dig out of 6-1.    Rojas' limited mobility hurt the Dodgers defense on a Bogaerts ground ball where Merrill was too quick going first to second, and Rojas ended up getting no outs on a routine ground ball. Manny with a cagey zigzag baserunning move during the Padres 6-run inning off Buehler, getting into Freeman's throwing lane to put Buehler into the jam. Teoscar grand slam brings it back to 6-5 in the 3rd inning...get your popcorn ready.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...