Dan Duquette: Os to Be Active in Trade Market

[weams]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Dan Duquette says he hopes <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Orioles?src=hash">#Orioles</a> will be active in trade market.</p>— Rich Dubroff (@RichDubroffCSN) <a href="

">June 8, 2016</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

[LookitsPuck]

Ubaldo to Cleveland for a comp pick and Gallardo to Texas for a comp pick?

[Frobby]

I don't see that we have the prospects to acquire anything better than a back of rotation starter. Frankly, I'm not sure that's a worthwhile exercise.

[Can_of_corn]

In other news they will be targeting players in next years rule V draft.

Breaking....

Fire is hot.

[Can_of_corn]

I don't see that we have the prospects to acquire anything better than a back of rotation starter. Frankly, I'm not sure that's a worthwhile exercise.

Maybe he gets another competitive balance pick he can trade away?

[Tx Oriole]

I don't see that we have the prospects to acquire anything better than a back of rotation starter. Frankly, I'm not sure that's a worthwhile exercise.

I don't think it is.

[ChuckS]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Dan Duquette says he hopes <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Orioles?src=hash">#Orioles</a> will be active in trade market.</p>— Rich Dubroff (@RichDubroffCSN) <a href="

">June 8, 2016</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

No two month rentals please.

Prefer not to part with Mancini or Sisco, considering they are cost controlled talent that could step in as everyday players as soon as next season. Anyone else is fair game as far as I'm concerned, but i would prefer to get talent back that is signed at least through 2017 unless we are just giving up C level prospects.

I'm sure we will add at least one starter, I just have no idea who. The offense seems good to go unless something changes over the next month or two.

[ArtVanDelay]

So we'll be trading Sisco for a 2 month rental 6th starter? Got it.

[weams]

No two month rentals please.

Prefer not to part with Mancini or Sisco, considering they are cost controlled talent that could step in as everyday players as soon as next season. Anyone else is fair game as far as I'm concerned, but i would prefer to get talent back that is signed at least through 2017 unless we are just giving up C level prospects.

I'm sure we will add at least one starter, I just have no idea who. The offense seems good to go unless something changes over the next month or two.

That's why the Bud Norris deal looked good. A couple bites of the apple.

[Can_of_corn]

That's why the Bud Norris deal looked good. A couple bites of the apple.

The love was not universal.

A back end guy at arbitration prices isn't much of a bargain.

[brianod]

Why does this not comfort me?

[OFFNY]

I don't see that we have the prospects to acquire anything better than a back-of-the-rotation starter. Frankly, I'm not sure that's a worthwhile exercise.

Yordano Ventura ???

[Frobby]

That's why the Bud Norris deal looked good. A couple bites of the apple.

Except that one of those bites was rotten.

[Frobby]

Yordano Ventura ???

Talent-wise, I'd love to have him. But there's zero chance we'd trade for that head case.

[tntoriole]

Duquette and in season trades? Ummm..please God no.