Jump to content

TT: Orioles' offense well positioned down stretch despite recent struggles


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

Again, it would matter little if he did.

I don't know if I agree with this line of thinking. Why would you not want your better hitters to have more opportunities? If Davis is a K machine right now, why do you want him sitting in the number four hole after Jones, Kim or Machado have gotten on?

I believe you put your better hitters at the top of the lineup and if someone is severely struggling, you drop them and put the hot hand in there. Nothing wrong wit dropping Davis to 5th or 6th in the lineup until he finds his way out of his current drought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if I agree with this line of thinking. Why would you not want your better hitters to have more opportunities? If Davis is a K machine right now, why do you want him sitting in the number four hole after Jones, Kim or Machado have gotten on?

I believe you put your better hitters at the top of the lineup and if someone is severely struggling, you drop them and put the hot hand in there. Nothing wrong wit dropping Davis to 5th or 6th in the lineup until he finds his way out of his current drought.

I agree, the difference for the last month or two is minuscule in number of at bats. So bat him eighth if you want to. I don't think it matters much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There isn't anything to worry about in this regard.

A team hitting as we were doing, won't slump for the rest of the season.

I do agree at moving Davis out of the 4-hole until he has broken out of his funk though. I'd push Schoop up. Mind you, I'd also be tempted to switch Kim and Jones around. AJ hits enough long balls and Kim gets on base frequently enough to see this as a + move IMO

As per all season, pitching looks more of a worry. I'm hoping that Bundy's recent form keeps going, which will help

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Methinks the flu has slowed some guys. It can take awhile to fully recover. Offensive resurgence imminent.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yep. Flu. Some pretty good pitching we have faced. Some games on the road. Nasty travel last week (two straight nights we had to fly after a night game and get in at 4-6AM and then play that evening in a new city, I don't know if any other major league team has had to do that this year).

And yes, some guys in bad slumps. Chris Davis has a history of being streaky.

We hit 4 HRs last night, 3 off a guy who had only given up 3 in a game once or twice in his career. Hopefully we're coming out of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There isn't anything to worry about in this regard.

A team hitting as we were doing, won't slump for the rest of the season.

I do agree at moving Davis out of the 4-hole until he has broken out of his funk though. I'd push Schoop up. Mind you, I'd also be tempted to switch Kim and Jones around. AJ hits enough long balls and Kim gets on base frequently enough to see this as a + move IMO

As per all season, pitching looks more of a worry. I'm hoping that Bundy's recent form keeps going, which will help

The only reason I like them batting the way they are is that Jones hits more hard ground balls that can be turned into DP than Kim. Also, having a lefty bat 2nd gives more opportunity for Rf hits that move the runner to 3rd. Saying that,, having on OBP guy before a power guy does make some sense. right now Jones seems compfrtable leading off and most pitches like to start off with the fastball early in the game so you would think he's seeing a few more fastballs than normal. Don't know if the stats back that up though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
    • Interesting. I had forgotten that they signed him and then got him in the pitching lab in the offseason. Since September is prior to the end of the season, I would take "two year contract" to mean September '23 is Year 1, and then '24 is Year 2.  That is a cool article. Very encouraging how closely they are following the KBO. 
    • I think most teams would want to have an MVP candidate at quarterback.   Most of the time this will mean that he is better than the guy they currently have.  That's why. My quote was not taking salary into account.  If you take his current salary into account I think you are still talking about a majority of the NFL teams that would take him right now.  If the salary is an issue you find a way to make it work.  I'm starting to come around to the idea that the salary cap is kinda fake in a way after I keep seeing teams do stuff like adding void years other trickery to get the guys they want.
    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...