Jump to content

at. YANKEES, 10/01


Sessh

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 802
  • Created
  • Last Reply
It really hasn't been. It's weird.

There's a weird energy about this years team that just hasn't been enjoyable.

I can't put my finger on it but 2012 and 2014 are infinitely more enjoyable teams to watch.

Those teams played .500 ball in the first half then turned it on in the second half. This team did the opposite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Miley, Brach and Buck. Chokers.

And the offense? Chokers.

And the defense? Chokers.

Yankees will win tomorrow, too. Gausman will wilt.

Fans who give up on the team because of one crappy, poorly played and poorly managed game? Quitters and losers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Miley, Brach and Buck. Chokers.

And the offense? Chokers.

And the defense? Chokers.

Yankees will win tomorrow, too. Gausman will wilt.

I don't think Miley choked at all. He gave 6 strong and pitched as good as we could expect. Buck left him to the wolves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is it that all of the right-handed relievers on this team have such bad splits against lefties? Brad Brach has a .282 opponent's BA against lefties, Tommy Hunter has a .313 opponent's BA and we all know the issues Givens has had against lefties this year. There's not a single right-handed reliever on this team you can trust to get out an Ortiz or even a good switch-hitter like Beltran.

Part of it is Wieters refuses to call the changeup that can be effective for Brach and Givens against lefties. Hunter is no good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Id rather have a lefty specialist against rob refsnyder than brach against ellsbury.

It was another terrible decision.

Period.

I would have left Donnie in, but because I am a pessimist when it comes to relief pitchers. Every time one comes in, I assume they are going to screw the pooch, not that they will succeed. But I would not have been surprised in the least if Refsnyder had launched one off Donnie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. Buck has cost this team numerous games with his insistence on keeping his starter out too long. No matter how poor the matchup, Buck is always intent on keeping that starter out there. It's just awful and indefensible. If the Orioles come up a game short, Buck's managing will have to be looked at closely. He can't keep making the same mistakes and then say, "I felt he could get him out".

Buck, it doesn't matter what your feel, you put the best matchup from the 7th inning on and sometimes in the 6th with your starters.

I understand if it happens once or twice a season, but Buck let's it happen WAY too often.

We have an expanded roster. There are two games left in the season.

USE THE DAMN PEN!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have left Donnie in, but because I am a pessimist when it comes to relief pitchers. Every time one comes in, I assume they are going to screw the pooch, not that they will succeed. But I would not have been surprised in the least if Refsnyder had launched one off Donnie.

He's given up 1 run the entire season. Apparently that's not good enough to face rob freaking refsnyder!

Terrible decision yet again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Here’s the thing (right now), we have 6 starters (one too many) and not enough good relievers (certainly none who can pitch more than an inning). Kremer has issues (this season) the more times that he does through the lineup (especially the third time through). It seems plausible to me that the switch given Kremer’s stuff would be better for everyone where Kremer may even at a tick in velo and be better at getting strikeouts as a reliever. And Irvin who has been an excellent starter (thus far) could continue in that role.
    • On one hand, it's always a bad thing when a pitcher has to get a 4th out, either because of an error or an umpire's mistake. On the other hand, a pitcher still has to execute and can't serve up a meatball. That being said, that was probably the most impactful non-strike call I can remember this year, maybe a few years.   EDIT: From Melewski - "Sometimes the strike call you don't get leads to the fastball you throw that leaves the ballpark."
    • It's fine, but I would personally prefer having Cowser and Adley taking tons of pitches back-to-back before Gunnar further punishes the opposing starting pitcher with high exit velo barrels. 
    • I was going to say pretty much the same thing about Cowser in my post, but left out my thoughts to keep the post more Gunnar-centric. But I totally agree that Cowser fits the best as this team's leadoff hitter, especially since Holliday doesn't look like he's going to make an impact offensively as early as most of us thought heading into the season.  Going back to last season, I've said Cowser has the best mix of patience, hit tool, power, and speed to be a great leadoff hitter. The strikeouts are most likely always going to be high with him, but he has .380-.400+ OBP makeup, and having someone like that hitting leadoff with Adley and Gunnar hitting directly behind Cowser is going to set things up for an elite offense which is much more dynamic and less one-dimensional than the what we've seen up until this point. Cowser Adley Gunnar Westburg O'Hearn Santander Mountcastle Is an ideal top 7 against RHP for right now, with Kjerstad (replacing Hays) and Mayo (essentially replacing Mateo and bumping Westburg to 2B) making the lineup legitimately scary within the next couple months. Mullins and Hays need to be phased out, with Santander and Mountcastle not far behind if those two continue struggling and not reaching base enough to justify hitting in the middle of the order.
    • A lot of teams (likely driven by analytics) are putting their best overall hitter at 2 (like the Yankees batting Soto 2, and the Dodgers batting Shohei 2) to maximize ABs while guaranteeing that a high-OBP guy is batting in front of him to give him opportunities with men on base.  That's probably what we want.  It seems logical considering how thoroughly debunked small-ball in the first inning has been.  Rutschman at 3 is fine.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...