Jump to content

Pedro back. (Will he opt out?)


oriolesacox

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Pedro, in his last 10 games in AAA, is batting .372 with 6 homers and 16 RBI.     As bad as he was to start the year, that's how hot he is right now.   There really is no place to play him but I bet the Orioles figure something out.   Otherwise, I do believe he'll opt out and have a pretty good 2nd half for someone else.

Of course, they could promote Alvarez and cut someone else but that person, barring a DL stint for someone else could only be Kim.   Ha.   I did predict Kim would be gone by June 1.   Alvarez probably has an opt out on June 1.   What a coincidence!

I agree. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 385
  • Created
  • Last Reply
22 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Pedro, in his last 10 games in AAA, is batting .372 with 6 homers and 16 RBI.     As bad as he was to start the year, that's how hot he is right now.   There really is no place to play him but I bet the Orioles figure something out.   Otherwise, I do believe he'll opt out and have a pretty good 2nd half for someone else.

Of course, they could promote Alvarez and cut someone else but that person, barring a DL stint for someone else could only be Kim.   Ha.   I did predict Kim would be gone by June 1.   Alvarez probably has an opt out on June 1.   What a coincidence!

But Pedro can't play the field. Everything I've read says he's pretty bad in the OF. As long as Trey continues to produce Pedro can't DH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, scOtt said:

But Pedro can't play the field. Everything I've read says he's pretty bad in the OF. As long as Trey continues to produce Pedro can't DH.

Too bad Trumbo has no value now. I would happily replace him with Pedro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On May 28, 2017 at 1:38 PM, scOtt said:

But Pedro can't play the field. Everything I've read says he's pretty bad in the OF. As long as Trey continues to produce Pedro can't DH.

Agreed. Pedro on the MLB roster creates a pretty substantial logjam, because he honestly can't play the field, anywhere. If Smith or Kim were to go on the DL for something, maybe you can find him a spot, but that's about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, FlipTheBird said:

Agreed. Pedro on the MLB roster creates a pretty substantial logjam, because he honestly can't play the field, anywhere. If Smith or Kim were to go on the DL for something, maybe you can find him a spot, but that's about it.

Even then you still have Joey. I give him a lot more credit than most on here... But in a pinch he's fine. Pedro has no spot here.

And nothing against him! I'd LOVE to have his bat in the lineup! He just doesn't fit here. Wish him well. Let him go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/28/2017 at 1:13 PM, RZNJ said:

Pedro, in his last 10 games in AAA, is batting .372 with 6 homers and 16 RBI.     As bad as he was to start the year, that's how hot he is right now.   There really is no place to play him but I bet the Orioles figure something out.   Otherwise, I do believe he'll opt out and have a pretty good 2nd half for someone else.

Of course, they could promote Alvarez and cut someone else but that person, barring a DL stint for someone else could only be Kim.   Ha.   I did predict Kim would be gone by June 1.   Alvarez probably has an opt out on June 1.   What a coincidence!

I agree,

Here is an idea.

I don't know when Pedro Alvarez next opt out is but he is hitting  .349 with 6 homer over his last 10 games.   I have to think it will be hard for the O's to let him go with their offense slumping.   

Also 27 year old supersub Garabez Rosa is hitting 349/359/366/847 in 200 at bats in AA.  He can play almost anywhere.including right, center and ss.    He could be a good backup for Hardy and Jones.

Meanwhile, Smith is hitting for a 691 OPS in May.  Rickard has a 659 OPS on the year and has an option.   Janish is known as a no hit/good defense player at UIF. 

I know this is a move for offense over defense but the O's could promote Alvarez to DH pushing Trumbo to right and Smith to the bench.    Promote Rosa to supersub to back up Jones in center, backup Hardy at SS and platoon with Pedro/Trumbo vs left-handed pitching.  Rosa bats right-handed and is killing lefties with a 977 OPS this year.  Rosa has three options.   Rickard would be optioned and Janish DFA'd  hopefully to Norfolk.

Just a thought.  Letting Pedro go when his opt out coming up will be hard for the O's with the offense slumping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, birdwatcher55 said:

Pedro played in the field in Pittsburgh for years. Put him on third, bench Hardy and move Machado to short. Might light a fire under him.

I'd rather see Pedro at DH and Trumbo in right like last year when the O's won 89

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, scOtt said:

Even then you still have Joey. I give him a lot more credit than most on here... But in a pinch he's fine. Pedro has no spot here.

And nothing against him! I'd LOVE to have his bat in the lineup! He just doesn't fit here. Wish him well. Let him go.

Well I don't think Pedro would ever be a full-time guy, unless there were a bunch of injuries. But if, say, Seth Smith went down for a few weeks... you could bring Pedro up and let him DH against righties while Trumbo mans RF. And so on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, birdwatcher55 said:

Pedro played in the field in Pittsburgh for years. Put him on third, bench Hardy and move Machado to short. Might light a fire under him.

I would like to see Pedro in the Orioles lineup vs. RH pitchers. But not this way. I'm guessing you haven't seen much of Pedro at third base. (Last year, he had a .556 FA at 3B, on 4 errors in 9 chances.). I have, and I shuddered when he went out there last year. Now he's older and even more out of practice at third.

The difference between an a JJ/Manny left side and one with Manny and Pedro would be enormous. I don't know how much Pedro would have to hit to make up for that difference, but it would be a lot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cowser had a 4.0 fWAR in 2024. You ready to lock him up for 7-8 years or longer?
    • I think he already had and it was Bradish.  Midling prospect who turns out to have #1 level stuff.  Injuries are a bitch.
    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...