Jump to content

Whas that it?


webbrick2010

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply
20 minutes ago, webbrick2010 said:

 

Chris Davis mustered a 7 game hit streak and a few HR's, and now he is back to not being able to even put a ball in play?

You just don't get what you used to for 21 million dollars

 

 

o

 

Just a few days ago in a game thread, you were praising Davis for getting on base and calling Mark Trumbo "Trumbum" for following it up with an out.

Now Trumbo is heating up, so Davis is again your whipping boy.

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OFFNY said:

o

 

Just a few days ago in a game thread, you were praising Davis for getting on base and calling Mark Trumbo "Trumbum" for following it up with an out.

Now Trumbo is hot, so Davis is again your whipping boy.

 

o

You can't even engage people like him into a real conversation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said, a short spurt and back to a 9 week slump. That's the real Chris Davis. What a terrible contract. We will regret that one for a long time to come. Albert Bell all over again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, joeyc said:

I said, a short spurt and back to a 9 week slump. That's the real Chris Davis. What a terrible contract. We will regret that one for a long time to come. Albert Bell all over again.

Not even close.

Bell was productive and then he was injured.  Yes he cost the team a spot on the 40 man but the insurance paid the salary.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, OFFNY said:

o

 

Just a few days ago in a game thread, you were praising Davis for getting on base and calling Mark Trumbo "Trumbum" for following it up with an out.

Now Trumbo is heating up, so Davis is again your whipping boy.

 

o

Make no mistake I think both contracts are horrendous and both players not worth a quarter of the salary DD gifted them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, joeyc said:

I said, a short spurt and back to a 9 week slump. That's the real Chris Davis. What a terrible contract. We will regret that one for a long time to come. Albert Bell all over again.

Albert Belle was good. He just got hurt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, webbrick2010 said:

Make no mistake I think both contracts are horrendous and both players not worth a quarter of the salary DD gifted them

I'd love to build a team with your discards. I recall you trashing Dan for not signing Zimmermann as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, weams said:

I'd love to build a team with your discards. I recall you trashing Dan for not signing Zimmermann as well. 

Nope... never did... and if you haven't figured out my message by now, it is simple

I don't believe in any long term free agent contracts... they almost all turn out to be failures

I believe in drafting well, developing well and fielding a team largely made of young pre FA players, add in an occasional nugget late bloomer, and a few still productive past prime veterans on max 3 year contracts. Trade high on the Jim Johnson, Darren O'day, Zach Britton, Mark Trumbo, Chris Davis types after their "career" years and re-stock the system.

Pretty much disagree with every major trade/extension that DD has made since he got here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, webbrick2010 said:

Nope... never did... and if you haven't figured out my message by now, it is simple

I don't believe in any long term free agent contracts... they almost all turn out to be failures

I believe in drafting well, developing well and fielding a team largely made of young pre FA players, add in an occasional nugget late bloomer, and a few still productive past prime veterans on max 3 year contracts. Trade high on the Jim Johnson, Darren O'day, Zach Britton, Mark Trumbo, Chris Davis types after their "career" years and re-stock the system.

Pretty much disagree with every major trade/extension that DD has made since he got here.

2

My apologies then.  There was a clamor. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, webbrick2010 said:

Nope... never did... and if you haven't figured out my message by now, it is simple

I don't believe in any long term free agent contracts... they almost all turn out to be failures

I believe in drafting well, developing well and fielding a team largely made of young pre FA players, add in an occasional nugget late bloomer, and a few still productive past prime veterans on max 3 year contracts. Trade high on the Jim Johnson, Darren O'day, Zach Britton, Mark Trumbo, Chris Davis types after their "career" years and re-stock the system.

Pretty much disagree with every major trade/extension that DD has made since he got here.

I agree with much of your sentiment, but it's hard to win without overpaying for some players. Also, do you just want Angelos to keep the money? I guess you would want to invest a lot more in the minor league system, international signings, etc, but that leaves a lot of money on the table. I do not care if the Orioles over pay for wins unless it really hinders them in the future. I don't like what they have done in terms of losing picks and the like, but I don't care if they overpay Hardy, Davis, or others if the money wasn't going to be used to improve the team now or long term...and there's little evidence that it really would be used better IMO. Who cares if they overpay if the only real damage is to Angelos' profit margins. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, webbrick2010 said:

Nope... never did... and if you haven't figured out my message by now, it is simple

I don't believe in any long term free agent contracts... they almost all turn out to be failures

I believe in drafting well, developing well and fielding a team largely made of young pre FA players, add in an occasional nugget late bloomer, and a few still productive past prime veterans on max 3 year contracts. Trade high on the Jim Johnson, Darren O'day, Zach Britton, Mark Trumbo, Chris Davis types after their "career" years and re-stock the system.

Pretty much disagree with every major trade/extension that DD has made since he got here.

The problem with that recipe is it will make you good for a few years, with a chance to make the playoffs, then really bad for a few years when players don't pan out. A good organization does a lot of what you talk about, but they also have to be able to identify and sign long term the players they build around. I agree with you that Davis was not that kind of player. i didn't have an issue with resigning him, I only had an issue with signing him for seven years. 

No way he was the kind of player that gets a seven year contract and the fact the Orioles basically negotiated against themselves really showed a lack of understanding of the market. Then again, I've also head the decision was a ownership decision more than a DD decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

The problem with that recipe is it will make you good for a few years, with a chance to make the playoffs, then really bad for a few years when players don't pan out. A good organization does a lot of what you talk about, but they also have to be able to identify and sign long term the players they build around. I agree with you that Davis was not that kind of player. i didn't have an issue with resigning him, I only had an issue with signing him for seven years. 

No way he was the kind of player that gets a seven year contract and the fact the Orioles basically negotiated against themselves really showed a lack of understanding of the market. Then again, I've also head the decision was a ownership decision more than a DD decision.

That strategy works better when ownership is willing to invest in the International market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cowser had a 4.0 fWAR in 2024. You ready to lock him up for 7-8 years or longer?
    • I think he already had and it was Bradish.  Midling prospect who turns out to have #1 level stuff.  Injuries are a bitch.
    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...