Jump to content

Washington, not Alvarez possibly coming


Legend_Of_Joey

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, FlipTheBird said:

Right now he benefits most from playing full-time in Bowie. Against all pitchers.

Besides, where's he going to play? With a RHP on the mound Kim and Smith will likely remain in the OF, assuming Smith's "physical issue" tonight was minor.

He's also currently NOT on the 40-man roster, and it'd be silly to add a guy of his caliber to the 40-man if you intend to demote him when the team gets healthy.

That's why Washington is here. He will, in all likelihood, be DFA'd upon Davis' return.

There's so much trash on the 40 man that is not an issue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply
12 minutes ago, FlipTheBird said:

That's why Washington is here. He will, in all likelihood, be DFA'd upon Davis' return.

Possibly, or one of the pitchers.

Reason being, if he does good, they might keep him on incase they need him quickly if Davis's injury flares up. Oblique strains aren't fun and can be tricky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, FlipTheBird said:

Bridwell was not a guy to watch. He was a guy that had had opportunities and didn't hack it. He makes one mediocre start for the Angels and people here lost their minds. He's currently back in Salt Lake doing his usual pedestrian thing.

Agree with the point, but in fact he isn't in AAA.  Called back up, pitched 3.2 relief innings last night when Shoemaker only went 3 in his start.  Gave up 7 hits but just one unearned run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just one game, but Washington looked terrible last night. 0 for 4, with 3Ks and a fairly well hit line drive to CF. He has a big swing that appears to leave plenty of holes (or maybe just one or two large ones). The White Sox went right after him with pitches in or near the strike zone. The 3 Ks were on nine pitches, and he wasn't close to any of them. One of the K's was with first and second with no outs in the fourth, when the O's were trying to come back after falling behind 5-1. Washington did not seem to let the situation affect his approach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, FlipTheBird said:

Cedric Mullins has exactly 88 at bats above Low-A. And is coming off of an injury that had him sitting for a month. He needs plenty of seasoning yet.

 

1

I saw an 0 for 4 the other day. Anything good since? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SteveA said:

Agree with the point, but in fact he isn't in AAA.  Called back up, pitched 3.2 relief innings last night when Shoemaker only went 3 in his start.  Gave up 7 hits but just one unearned run.

We all know Bridwell has an arm. I was sad to see him go. He was going after this season anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

There's so much trash on the 40 man that is not an issue. 

So you want to start Mullins' clock, lose a guy off the 40-man and take at bats away from the kid just for a couple of weeks? It would be a foolish move. Very reminiscent of the O's during the "dark period" years, where they'd call up guys as soon as they did anything in the minors, and just throw them to the MLB wolves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, weams said:

I saw an 0 for 4 the other day. Anything good since? 

A 2/4 last night, with one SB and one CS. Now slashing .326/.366/.598. Up to 22 whole games above Low-A, haha.

I'm excited about his start, too, but need to see it played out over a whole season first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

Just one game, but Washington looked terrible last night. 0 for 4, with 3Ks and a fairly well hit line drive to CF. He has a big swing that appears to leave plenty of holes (or maybe just one or two large ones). The White Sox went right after him with pitches in or near the strike zone. The 3 Ks were on nine pitches, and he wasn't close to any of them. One of the K's was with first and second with no outs in the fourth, when the O's were trying to come back after falling behind 5-1. Washington did not seem to let the situation affect his approach.

Washington is not a hitter, he's a swinger. Sometimes he gets lucky and makes good contact. A lot of the time, he doesn't. He isn't a prospect. He's a body.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

Just one game, but Washington looked terrible last night. 0 for 4, with 3Ks and a fairly well hit line drive to CF. He has a big swing that appears to leave plenty of holes (or maybe just one or two large ones). The White Sox went right after him with pitches in or near the strike zone. The 3 Ks were on nine pitches, and he wasn't close to any of them. One of the K's was with first and second with no outs in the fourth, when the O's were trying to come back after falling behind 5-1. Washington did not seem to let the situation affect his approach.

As I already said, I think this is just about rewarding him with a ML call-up.  I don't think he will stay up long or play a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, FlipTheBird said:

A 2/4 last night, with one SB and one CS. Now slashing .326/.366/.598. Up to 22 whole games above Low-A, haha.

I'm excited about his start, too, but need to see it played out over a whole season first.

Good then!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FlipTheBird said:

Washington is not a hitter, he's a swinger. Sometimes he gets lucky and makes good contact. A lot of the time, he doesn't. He isn't a prospect. He's a body.

Washington is not good. The ball was in the mit before he swung last night. He might be able to run into a few in AAA off Tyler Wilson types, but he has no place up here. But it's just a temp call up so who cares?  I'd just rather give those 20 ABs to someone else.  

I agree that it might be rushing Mullins a little bit but he's a very confident guy and I don't think he'd be rattled. My point was that at least he would something different to the lineup. Speed and defense. Washington is just another high strike out DH.  

You're worried about starting Mullins clock?  Geez, we're already passed all the big dates for that.  Plus with Smith and Kim being FA's, he going to get a long look in ST next year regardless.  Plus we might be rebuilding in 6 weeks.  

On to Bridwell, when you have an organization so thin with SP, why would you give up a SP in AAA that throws 93-94 with a plus change up?  This is how terrible we are at evaluating our own talent.  DD thought Bridwell couldn't crack the great Norfolk rotation.  Same evaluation problem with Miranda, just 9 months later. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Washington is not good. The ball was in the mit before he swung last night. He might be able to run into a few in AAA off Tyler Wilson types, but he has no place up here. But it's just a temp call up so who cares?  I'd just rather give those 20 ABs to someone else.  

I agree that it might be rushing Mullins a little bit but he's a very confident guy and I don't think he'd be rattled. My point was that at least he would something different to the lineup. Speed and defense. Washington is just another high strike out DH.  

You're worried about starting Mullins clock?  Geez, we're already passed all the big dates for that.  Plus with Smith and Kim being FA's, he going to get a long look in ST next year regardless.  Plus we might be rebuilding in 6 weeks.  

On to Bridwell, when you have an organization so thin with SP, why would you give up a SP in AAA that throws 93-94 with a plus change up?  This is how terrible we are at evaluating our own talent.  DD thought Bridwell couldn't crack the great Norfolk rotation.  Same evaluation problem with Miranda, just 9 months later. 

If you put him on the 40 now it is one less rule V guy they can pick up during the winter meetings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Washington is not good. The ball was in the mit before he swung last night. He might be able to run into a few in AAA off Tyler Wilson types, but he has no place up here. But it's just a temp call up so who cares?  I'd just rather give those 20 ABs to someone else.  

I agree that it might be rushing Mullins a little bit but he's a very confident guy and I don't think he'd be rattled. My point was that at least he would something different to the lineup. Speed and defense. Washington is just another high strike out DH.  

You're worried about starting Mullins clock?  Geez, we're already passed all the big dates for that.  Plus with Smith and Kim being FA's, he going to get a long look in ST next year regardless.  Plus we might be rebuilding in 6 weeks.  

On to Bridwell, when you have an organization so thin with SP, why would you give up a SP in AAA that throws 93-94 with a plus change up?  This is how terrible we are at evaluating our own talent.  DD thought Bridwell couldn't crack the great Norfolk rotation.  Same evaluation problem with Miranda, just 9 months later. 

Let me be clear, here: I think Cedric Mullins has more to prove before we bump him from AA to the Major Leagues. I'm glad he's hitting well. But he's played 22 games now above Delmarva. We don't even know if this is real, yet, and I certainly don't see him showing up and hitting better than the guys we're currently starting in the outfield. So he wouldn't be getting regular at bats, which is detrimental for a guy who might be coming into his own.

If Mullins keeps hitting all year and we wind up launching a fire sale in late July, sure, bring him up. Or if we don't go fire sale then, sure, absolutely give him a look in ST next year. But there's absolutely no viable reason to bring him to Baltimore this very moment.

Washington is here because he's easy to lose. Much like Francisco Pena, we'll probably be able to drop him from the 40-man but retain his rights and plop him right back in Norfolk in two weeks. No harm, no foul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cowser had a 4.0 fWAR in 2024. You ready to lock him up for 7-8 years or longer?
    • I think he already had and it was Bradish.  Midling prospect who turns out to have #1 level stuff.  Injuries are a bitch.
    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...