Jump to content

If we buy, what can we afford?


Lucky_13

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply
8 minutes ago, Camden_yardbird said:

This team has legitimately 5 holes on the roster without a prayer of a prospect filling one.  Buying is an utterly ridiculous concept.

1-2 SP, 1-2 OF, SS, and a bullpen arm.

2 outfielders?  They have Jones. Smith and Mancini and Trumbo when Davis comes back.  They are not going to trade for one unless the Davis issue is end of year which it is not.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

2 outfielders?  They have Jones. Smith and Mancini and Trumbo when Davis comes back.  They are not going to trade for one unless the Davis issue is end of year which it is not.  

.736, .770 and .718 OPS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, thezeroes said:

$9.6 Million for half a year of Melky and a player or two seems a bit expensive.

Yeah but they really need to improve the outfield defense and get more production out of the LF spot now that Mancini is playing first. Kim really offers nothing. He can't play defense, steal bases or hit for power. I'd much rather see a Smith/Rickard platoon in right, Jones in Center, and Cabrera in Left. I know its a rental but we have Mullins and Hays coming up next year and money to spend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Babypowder said:

A hot dog and a half of a cigarette.

Seriously, we can't get anything for Trumbo people. No one wanted to pay him what the O's gave him when he was a free agent, and he's only lowered his value since. He's half a win below replacement level right now. We would get nothing, and also have to pay someone money to take him.

I agree.

Unless a power bat gets injured. Or two... Things can change quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Lucky_13 said:

I'd look at Sonny Gray. Hasn't been amazing the last two years but if you can get him for Sisco I'd go for it. 2 years of control after this season. Maybe needs a change of scenery. Knowing Beane it'll take Sisco+ so that's a pipe dream. 

Trade Sisco or Gray! He'll never play catcher in MLB. Worst case scenario: the Orioles will have traded Jayson Werth again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Beef Supreme said:

Trade Sisco or Gray! He'll never play catcher in MLB. Worst case scenario: the Orioles will have traded Jayson Werth again.

If its just Sisco then sure but I have a feeling they'll want one of Akin, Sedlock, Hays, or Mullens as well which hurts a depleted farm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cowser had a 4.0 fWAR in 2024. You ready to lock him up for 7-8 years or longer?
    • I think he already had and it was Bradish.  Midling prospect who turns out to have #1 level stuff.  Injuries are a bitch.
    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...