Jump to content

MANCINI TRADE (Sideline Speculative Possibilities)


pocketRIPKENS

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, 24fps said:

Am I the only one who choked on his coffee reading this thread title?

Given the Orioles desperate need for starting pitching along with not one but two overpriced 1B, I can see Mancini being traded.  I certainly hope the Orioles don't.

No you are not. The Mods should change the tileto something less inflamatory. A simple question mark would help.:mad:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • weams changed the title to MANCINI TRADE (Sideline Speculative Possibilities)
  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

It's fanciful, but browsing the other bottom teams and looking at Mancini as a piece to sell to help this year's team, there are some interesting combinations.

TOR - rent Donaldson, Manny to short.  Or smaller, Happ/Estrada and Smith

DET - rent JD Martinez, ask for Justin Wilson too

CWS - Mancini might put us into Quintana conversation.  Robertson, Kahnle and (if healthy) Jones relief aces.

OAK - Gray and Doolittle

NYM - Bruce and Reed

MIA - Stanton, Ramos and lots of money.  Stanton, Barraclough and not as much money.

PHI - Galvis, Hellickson and Neshek (that one's mushy on quality)

PIT/CIN - no fit, those clubs set at OF/1B

SD - Solarte, Richard and Hand

SF - Cueto and Moore

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But who needs a 1B long term? 

Mariners - Currently playing Danny Valenica. They don't match up prospect wise. 

Mets  - Possible if Duda walks. They have 3 short stops in their top 10 prospects. 

Pirates - If they ever give up on Bell. They have a bunch of infield prospects in their top 30.

Rockies - Reynolds is a free agent. I'd target Ryan Mcmahon personally. 

Yankees - Possible but they don't really match up prospectwise. 

I don't really support trading Mancini but if they did I would only be ok with it if they got major league ready SS or 3B

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, pocketRIPKENS said:

 In my opinion, he isn't a perennial major league hitter, has very little versatility and is a defensive liability. His walk to K rate is bad and very feast or famine in my eyes. 

If that's your opinion then why would he be good trade bait that would bring us back anything of real value?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mancini doesn't have enough track record of preforming in the majors and wasn't a highly coveted prospect, his trade value is still relatively low.

Let him keep this up for this rest of the season and then more teams will start believing and he'll be worth more. If you are set on trading him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mancini is a beast.  Keep him.  The only focus DD should have until it is done, is what to do with #13.  Much of what happens for the next five to ten years with this franchise hinges on getting that decision right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, pocketRIPKENS said:

Make a case for trading Trey Mancini. What would he fetch? Is it completely moronic to trade him considering we have him locked up for 6 or so years? In my opinion, he isn't a perennial major league hitter, has very little versatility and is a defensive liability. His walk to K rate is bad and very feast or famine in my eyes. 

I would trade Machado before Mancini.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, BRobinsonfan said:

Fielding questions aside, he has the highest .obp and .ops on the team, he's 25, and we still need a DH.  

Trumbo is the DH for the next 2 years, Davis is the 1B for the next 5 years.

Mancini does not have a position with the O's... that is why he is an intriguing trade chip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, OrioleDog said:

Would anyone do Mancini for Sonny Gray and Sean Doolittle?  Could he even command both those guys?

It's a creative thought, and probably inarguable that Mancini is at a local peak in value.  It wouldn't shock me if the club's projections for outfielders in 2019 had Mancini in a muddle with Hays, Mountcastle and Mullins.

Of course I would do it and of course he couldn't command both.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Frobby said:

My general philosophy is that the market value of players should be tested on a regular basis.   You might be correct, but you never know unless you've tested the waters.   

Its a nice concept but what competitive team trades their best young players?   The Yankees needed to retool last year.  Did they trade young studs like Sanchez, Judge or Betance?  No.   They traded older or expensive players.   Beltran, Chapman and Miller.

I doubt the O's trade Mancini.   Britton is more likely,  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, DirtyBird said:

Because he's a 1B/DH and he's 25 years old - not enough of a track record of success  to be considered low risk and not young enough to be considered a high reward.

He's actually proven himself to be an adequate left fielder. Nothing to write home about, but he doesn't look bad out there, either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cowser had a 4.0 fWAR in 2024. You ready to lock him up for 7-8 years or longer?
    • I think he already had and it was Bradish.  Midling prospect who turns out to have #1 level stuff.  Injuries are a bitch.
    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...