Jump to content

When do Buck and Dan finally say enough is enough?


Diehard_O's_Fan

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, FlipTheBird said:

If you're ever actively rooting against your own team, something is broken in you as a fan.

Disinterest during a rough patch, fine. Openly rooting for them to lose? Nah. 

It makes sense in the NFL and NBA for better draft position.   For baseball it doesn't matter.  Draft picks are like 4-5 years away.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 hours ago, interloper said:

Don't get me wrong, I'd love for them to win every game from here on out, obvioiusly. while losing prospects and acquiring bad players in the process. I'd rather they lose, avoid buying at the deadline, and get a good draft pick to boot. Try again next year. 

I love it when people speak with certainty about baseball. xD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, FlipTheBird said:

If you're ever actively rooting against your own team, something is broken in you as a fan.

Disinterest during a rough patch, fine. Openly rooting for them to lose? Nah. 

I disagree.  As a fan I want what is best for my team and sometimes that is losing.  If that means I don't watch the game a see they lost later and say "good."  That fine with me and that's a fringe case.

Take draft position though.  Are you telling me you get to the end of the season and a loss means you get the first pick and you are not rooting for that outcome?  What if I told you that pick is projected to be a Trout level player?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, ArtVanDelay said:

You mean the guy who has a 1.41 WHIP and strikes out 5 per 9?

And a 3.24 ERA.  Even if he winds up with an ERA of 4.5, he's still a much better major league pitcher than anyone would have guessed based on his time with the Orioles' organization.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Camden_yardbird said:

I disagree.  As a fan I want what is best for my team and sometimes that is losing.  If that means I don't watch the game a see they lost later and say "good."  That fine with me and that's a fringe case.

Take draft position though.  Are you telling me you get to the end of the season and a loss means you get the first pick and you are not rooting for that outcome?  What if I told you that pick is projected to be a Trout level player?

I have a question. What do we mean by "rooting " for the team to lose. There is a difference between waking up that day and thinking " ehhh I hope we lose " and actually screaming " YES!!!! GO GO GO!!! " as Brett Gardner turns the corner, heading into 3rd for a walk off triple. I know I could NEVER do that with any of my sports teams. Regardless of what it may mean in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Camden_yardbird said:

I disagree.  As a fan I want what is best for my team and sometimes that is losing.  If that means I don't watch the game a see they lost later and say "good."  That fine with me and that's a fringe case.

Take draft position though.  Are you telling me you get to the end of the season and a loss means you get the first pick and you are not rooting for that outcome?  What if I told you that pick is projected to be a Trout level player?

Mike Trout was drafted with the 25th pick.   If you picked first, you would have missed him by 24 picks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

And a 3.24 ERA.  Even if he winds up with an ERA of 4.5, he's still a much better major league pitcher than anyone would have guessed based on his time with the Orioles' organization.  

His FIP is currently 5.82. Let's see where he finishes the season. I don't think it'll be with numbers anyone will be writing home about. He is not a prospect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Camden_yardbird said:

I disagree.  As a fan I want what is best for my team and sometimes that is losing.  If that means I don't watch the game a see they lost later and say "good."  That fine with me and that's a fringe case.

Take draft position though.  Are you telling me you get to the end of the season and a loss means you get the first pick and you are not rooting for that outcome?  What if I told you that pick is projected to be a Trout level player?

Even Mike Trout wasn't projected to be a Mike Trout level player. He was taken No. 25.

And your example is far too specific. If you get to the last game and it makes a difference, so be it. But rooting for them to just collapse by early July isn't being a fan, in my book.

Further, if you're tuned out and honestly hoping to check on them and find them failing, you're not helping the team on two levels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, FlipTheBird said:

His FIP is currently 5.82. Let's see where he finishes the season. I don't think it'll be with numbers anyone will be writing home about. He is not a prospect.

He might not be a prospect but he had good stuff and potential. I'd argue he's better then anyone riding the norfolk shuttle other than maybe aquino and the Orioles traded him for nothing. It's a problem of talent evaluation and development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The starters that "got away" in some way, shape or form during the Duquette administration (I'm sure there are others...this is just major league time logged)

  • Eduardo Rodriguez: 4.10 ERA, 108 ERA+, 1.264 WHIP, 4.14 FIP, 8.2 SO/9, 3.0 BB/9 - 290 IP
  • Zach Davies: 4.27 ERA, 100 ERA+, 1.323 WHIP, 4.23 FIP, 6.8 SO/9, 2.6 BB/9 - 288 IP
  • Miguel Gonzalez: 4.25 ERA, 97 ERA+, 1.334 WHIP, 4.25 FIP, 5.9 SO/9, 2.6 BB/9 - 213 IP
  • Ariel Miranda: 4.06 ERA, 104 ERA+, 1.142 WHIP, 5.24 FIP, 6.9 SO/9, 3.1 BB/9 - 162 IP
  • Jake Arrieta: 2.76 ERA, 142 ERA+, 1.026 WHIP, 3.05 FIP, 9.0 SO/9, 2.7 BB/9 - 730 IP
  • Parker Bridwell: 3.24 ERA, 131 ERA+, 1.410 WHIP, 5.82 FIP, 5.1 SO/9, 2.7 BB/9 - 33 IP
  • Andrew Triggs: 4.29 ERA, 96 ERA+, 1.282 WHIP, 3.88 FIP, 7.8 SO/9, 2.4 BB/9 - 121 IP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Lucky_13 said:

He might not be a prospect but he had good stuff and potential. I'd argue he's better then anyone riding the norfolk shuttle other than maybe aquino and the Orioles traded him for nothing. It's a problem of talent evaluation and development.

You're basing this off of a small handful of largely unremarkable MLB appearances. You can't possibly be willing to call him better than anyone on the Norfolk Shuttle for certain at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I just don't understand how this organization is run. Like a poster above wrote, we've made some really bad pitching decisions/evaluations. We have very few young, potential MLB players in our minors yet we seem to give away some  decent players quite often at the trade deadline. I'm not a DD fan at all. I get so tired of reading the headlines that say "Orioles acquire another no-talent player to fill a minor league roster spot". How often have you seen a DD transaction and think "who the hell is that bum??". He's great at picking up fringe players.

Sorry but this team need a complete overhaul. And why do we give away all of our international signing slots? It makes no sense.

Signed,

A frustrated lifelong O's fan

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

The starters that "got away" in some way, shape or form during the Duquette administration (I'm sure there are others...this is just major league time logged)

  • Eduardo Rodriguez: 4.10 ERA, 108 ERA+, 1.264 WHIP, 4.14 FIP, 8.2 SO/9, 3.0 BB/9 - 290 IP
  • Zach Davies: 4.27 ERA, 100 ERA+, 1.323 WHIP, 4.23 FIP, 6.8 SO/9, 2.6 BB/9 - 288 IP
  • Miguel Gonzalez: 4.25 ERA, 97 ERA+, 1.334 WHIP, 4.25 FIP, 5.9 SO/9, 2.6 BB/9 - 213 IP
  • Ariel Miranda: 4.06 ERA, 104 ERA+, 1.142 WHIP, 5.24 FIP, 6.9 SO/9, 3.1 BB/9 - 162 IP
  • Jake Arrieta: 2.76 ERA, 142 ERA+, 1.026 WHIP, 3.05 FIP, 9.0 SO/9, 2.7 BB/9 - 730 IP
  • Parker Bridwell: 3.24 ERA, 131 ERA+, 1.410 WHIP, 5.82 FIP, 5.1 SO/9, 2.7 BB/9 - 33 IP
  • Andrew Triggs: 4.29 ERA, 96 ERA+, 1.282 WHIP, 3.88 FIP, 7.8 SO/9, 2.4 BB/9 - 121 IP

Scott Feldman

Jason Hammel

Steven Brault

Wei Yin Chen

Jeremy Guthrie

Bud Norris

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cowser had a 4.0 fWAR in 2024. You ready to lock him up for 7-8 years or longer?
    • I think he already had and it was Bradish.  Midling prospect who turns out to have #1 level stuff.  Injuries are a bitch.
    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...