Jump to content

When do Buck and Dan finally say enough is enough?


Diehard_O's_Fan

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, paulcoates said:

If DD or PA thinks this team is going to finish 50-27 to get you the vaunted 90 win mark to have a chance as the wildcard team, they are seriously delusional

This isn't that complicated.     You do your spade work for trades over the next 2+ weeks, see if the team's position improves significantly, and if it doesn't, you do some selling.    However, it doesn't look like 90 wins is the likely wildcard cutoff.     It looks several games lower.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply
6 minutes ago, Frobby said:

This isn't that complicated.     You do your spade work for trades over the next 2+ weeks, see if the team's position improves significantly, and if it doesn't, you do some selling.    However, it doesn't look like 90 wins is the likely wildcard cutoff.     It looks several games lower.    

You may be right re: number of wins for the WC.

AL records of WC teams since implementing 2 team WC:

  • 2012: 93-69, 93-69
  • 2013: 92-70, 92-71
  • 2014: 89-73, 88-74
  • 2015: 87-75, 86-76
  • 2016: 89-73, 89-73

So let's go on the low end here. Let's say 86-76 squeaks in. That means the O's will need to go 46-31.  

Since going 15-8 in April, they've had a losing May (12-16), a losing June (12-16) and on their way to a losing July (1-5). Their starting pitching has also gotten worse every single month.

ERA by month (starting pitching):

  • April: 4.26
  • May: 5.16
  • June: 7.18
  • July: 8.36
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LookitsPuck said:

It was actually irresponsible because they kept Socolovich. Which was idiotic at the time for a variety of reasons. IT was 2012, the O's were in a Wild Card chase with the Athletics...and what did Duquette do? Give him to the A's for nothing. Beyond stupid.

No one could have known how a player turns out. Hindsight is 20/20.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LookitsPuck said:

You may be right re: number of wins for the WC.

AL records of WC teams since implementing 2 team WC:

  • 2012: 93-69, 93-69
  • 2013: 92-70, 92-71
  • 2014: 89-73, 88-74
  • 2015: 87-75, 86-76
  • 2016: 89-73, 89-73

So let's go on the low end here. Let's say 86-76 squeaks in. That means the O's will need to go 46-31.  

Since going 15-8 in April, they've had a losing May (12-16), a losing June (12-16) and on their way to a losing July (1-5). Their starting pitching has also gotten worse every single month.

ERA by month (starting pitching):

  • April: 4.26
  • May: 5.16
  • June: 7.18
  • July: 8.36

I don't think the starting pitching is likely to remain this bad.   

Right now, fangraphs pegs us with a 4.3% chance to make the playoffs.    BP says it's 2.1%.    Instinctively, that 2-4% range sounds about right to me.    If it's still in that ballpark (or worse) on, say, July 26, then it's sell time.     If it's back over 10%, then the decision gets a little harder.    I'll worry about it when we get there.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

I don't think the starting pitching is likely to remain this bad.   

Right now, fangraphs pegs us with a 4.3% chance to make the playoffs.    BP says it's 2.1%.    Instinctively, that 2-4% range sounds about right to me.    If it's still in that ballpark (or worse) on, say, July 26, then it's sell time.     If it's back over 10%, then the decision gets a little harder.    I'll worry about it when we get there.   

I can't imagine buying pieces for what looks to be a 1 in 33 chance of happening.  The Orioles need to concentrate on trading Machado and Britton for ML ready pitching.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

I don't think the starting pitching is likely to remain this bad.   

Right now, fangraphs pegs us with a 4.3% chance to make the playoffs.    BP says it's 2.1%.    Instinctively, that 2-4% range sounds about right to me.    If it's still in that ballpark (or worse) on, say, July 26, then it's sell time.     If it's back over 10%, then the decision gets a little harder.    I'll worry about it when we get there.   

It'll be lower by then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Probably.    That'll make the decision easier.     In fact, it looks a lot easier now than it was five days ago.    

I am as Pollyanna an optimist as there is. I kept thinking Syd Thrift had a magical trade left in him. This team has been cooked for a few weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cowser had a 4.0 fWAR in 2024. You ready to lock him up for 7-8 years or longer?
    • I think he already had and it was Bradish.  Midling prospect who turns out to have #1 level stuff.  Injuries are a bitch.
    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...