Jump to content

Fix the Starting Pitching


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

This has been the problem for years and we are no closer to fixing it than we were before Andy. We can't develop prospects and we can't find good ones on the FA market. What is wrong? The last two GM's? The scouting department? The coaches? If you were put in charge of the O's, what would you do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd start by putting every person involved with the minors under the microscope. It is so broken I can't believe it. Spend whatever it takes because this team will never be able to outspend the AL east. Whoever is responsible for the state of the minors should go. Enemy of the team. The lame duck GM is next in line. PA is smart enough to know this will undermine. Send him packing after the season. We have 1 of the best in Buck. I do wish someone else made in game pitching moves. The 5th-6th inning thing has killed us! Trade Manny for max return, whenever that is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at the teams that are successfully developing pitchers. St. Louis, Tampa, Cleveland. Hire their #2 to be our #1. Clean house, hold people accountable, and implement a new system.

I don't really care about the MLB pitching coach, it has to start earlier than that. 

I feel like the scouting is OK. We are bringing in guys with great stuff. They just aren't developing.   

It would help if we could recruit competitively in Latin America. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

Thanks for your responses. I guess most people don't want to take a shot at it. Too big of a problem?

I think it's just that there's discussion, lamentations, and gnashing of teeth about the past, current, and future pitching in many other recent threads. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RZNJ said:

There's no easy answer.   Obviously, we've developed very few starting pitchers.   Let's look at the two we have.   Bundy and Gausman were both top 5 picks in the entire draft.   Bundy already had all of the pitches but he did improve his change up in our system.   Gausman is essentially what he was when we drafted him, a hard thrower with a good split.      The problem is two fold.    We don't get enoiugh good young pitchers into our system.    That's a combination of 1) not drafting well enough    2) trading away the likes of Eduardo Rodriguez, Ariel Miranda, Zach Davies, and Steven Brault    3) being bottom feeders on the international scene.

Buck and others continually laud our developmental people as the best in the business.   The proof is in the pudding.   Who have we developed?    On the other hand, Rodriguez seemed to improve the minute he left the organization and Miranda was either under valued by us or not developed properly as well.

So, the organization 1) isn't getting enough pitching talent into the system    2) hasn't done a great job of developing the talent we do have   3) has traded away 3 ML starting pitchers (Rodriguez/Miranda/Davies).

I think #2 is debatable.   There is strength in numbers and the developmental staff aren't getting a lot to work with.

Bridwell for cash. He and Hader would be starting for us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On July 8, 2017 at 6:45 AM, Bahama O's Fan said:

This has been the problem for years and we are no closer to fixing it than we were before Andy. We can't develop prospects and we can't find good ones on the FA market. What is wrong? The last two GM's? The scouting department? The coaches? If you were put in charge of the O's, what would you do?

We are much further from fixing it. Dan has made things much worse. He's either paid more by the Yankees or he's awful at his job, I tend to believe the former. Double agent Dan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The majority of quality pitchers drafted -not all- come from the first 2 rounds. One of things that ticks me off is that Dan is blamed for everything.

He has been here 6 years, you can't blame him for what happened before he got here. He gets blamed for problems that were here when he arrived. Andy MacPhail himself I heard on an interview once say that Dan, unlike him was able to add pitching. Of course he was referring to Chen, Gonzalez, etc. 

I personally do not have an issue giving up draft picks to add starters when you have a core to win with. Dan though lost those picks on Ubaldo and Gallardo. That is on him and he whiffed.  He deserves the criticism for that. Those were major blunders.

The Orioles have winning under Dan and he has not had top 5, top 10 picks. Many of the Orioles top players recently have been top of the first round picks like Manny, Bundy, Gausman, Wieters etc. He drafted Harvey and unfortunately he has been hurt. Bundy had 3 years lost due to injury and last year they had to pitch him in the big leagues. Combine this with an owner that doesn't let him add IFA's. It is pretty hard for a middle market club when they are winning and limited by their owner to build a starting staff. Not impossible but hard. 

I also think the heat over the pitches he has lost is overblown. Miley had about a 2.50 era at the end of May. Bridwell hasn't pitched enough yet to be going nuts over him. The Davies-Parra trade was not a good one but Davies in our division? More of what we already have? Miranda has been solid but once again will it last? As bad as some of our starters have been, this year has been a worst case scenario.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, backwardsk said:

Has anybody mentioned Flaherty for Kershaw?

No but McFarland USA is a shut down reliever in the NL ?

 

Hader, Ed Rod, Arrieta, Bridwell, Bundy looks nice heading into 2018 imo. Gausman, Miranda get some more work in AAA, then Harvey, Aik & Hall coming up behind them with Liranzo and others looking like they will be able to help after more development. Cheap staff let's us get some bats. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Cowser had a 4.0 fWAR in 2024. You ready to lock him up for 7-8 years or longer?
    • I think he already had and it was Bradish.  Midling prospect who turns out to have #1 level stuff.  Injuries are a bitch.
    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...