Jump to content

Heyman Says The Dodgers and Cubs Are Interested in Britton Again


section18

Recommended Posts

Just now, wildbillhiccup said:

Trading Britton and gambling on Brach or someone else being able to close makes sense. New solid closers emerge just about every year. For example, in 2017 - Knebel, Rivera, and Doolittle. In 2016 - Dyson, Gomez, Jeffress, and Madson. My point being, it makes sense if we can get a solid return / fill a need like starting pitching. 

And for every closer that comes out each year, several other fail.

Why is K-Rod still in the league as closer?

Givens had as many blown saves as Brach did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 159
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 minutes ago, webbrick2010 said:

Not bad, at the point in Mid May when Britton became the #1 closer, Hunter had been successful on 11 of 13 save opportunities, and the Orioles won their only division title in 30 years

There have been other quality set-up men that failed in the role of closer over the years around MLB.

Not everybody agrees with this, but I am in the camp, that closing is harder than some believe and not pen arm has the mental fortitude to close regularly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.rotoworld.com/player/mlb/4514/brandon-morrow

According to Patrick Mooney of NBC Sports Chicago, the Cubs have identified free agent reliever Brandon Morrow as an offseason target.
Morrow put up a stellar 2.06 ERA and 50/9 K/BB ratio over 43 2/3 regular-season innings for the Dodgers and then shut down the Cubs in the National League Championship Series. Mooney says the Cubs "are also expected to monitor" the market for free agent Addison Reed as they look for new late-inning relief options. The asking price on Orioles closer Zach Britton is said to be "too high." Nov 16 - 11:54 AM
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trade relievers, sign relievers with upside on the cheap, trade them at the deadline if they’re good.  Good way to add talent if you have the cash.

Radical idea but trade them all, Brach, Britton, and Givens.

Sign Nicasio make him the closer.

Sign Tommy Hunter and a lefty reliever cheap.  

Financially it’ll be a wash or cheaper for 2018. The team gets prospects, and if Nicasio works as a closer then you have a big trade piece at the deadline who isn’t making closer money.

 If the team is winning at the deadline, then you keep them unless you have big holes that trading them would help you fill.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, phillyOs119 said:

Trade relievers, sign relievers with upside on the cheap, trade them at the deadline if they’re good.  Good way to add talent if you have the cash.

Radical idea but trade them all, Brach, Britton, and Givens.

Sign Nicasio make him the closer.

Sign Tommy Hunter and a lefty reliever cheap.  

Financially it’ll be a wash or cheaper for 2018. The team gets prospects, and if Nicasio works as a closer then you have a big trade piece at the deadline who isn’t making closer money.

 If the team is winning at the deadline, then you keep them unless you have big holes that trading them would help you fill.

 

Agreed.  High upside fliers on relievers is the way to go.  That's how we got Brach in the first place (was his upside even that high?), Bleier (not a high ceiling but adequate) and Castro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

It makes sense as a strategy for increasing team assets.    It's not a strategy for winning this year.     With a healthy Britton, we have one of the better bullpens in baseball.    The mistake is holding onto these guys once they start making money.   O'Day should never have been resigned especially going into his mid 30's.   Britton should have been dealt last year.   

Agreed on trading Britton last off-season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, phillyOs119 said:

Trade relievers, sign relievers with upside on the cheap, trade them at the deadline if they’re good.  Good way to add talent if you have the cash.

Radical idea but trade them all, Brach, Britton, and Givens.

Sign Nicasio make him the closer.

Sign Tommy Hunter and a lefty reliever cheap.  

Financially it’ll be a wash or cheaper for 2018. The team gets prospects, and if Nicasio works as a closer then you have a big trade piece at the deadline who isn’t making closer money.

 If the team is winning at the deadline, then you keep them unless you have big holes that trading them would help you fill.

 

Agree with trading Brach and Britton. I would like to keep Givens. I think his value will continue to increase as he masters that changeup. Not sure I want to see Tommy Hunter again but DD does have a good knack for finding talented relievers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Agree with trading Brach and Britton. I would like to keep Givens. I think his value will continue to increase as he masters that changeup. Not sure I want to see Tommy Hunter again but DD does have a good knack for finding talented relievers. 

Hunter has remade himself, and was pretty good last year, better than Brach. He’s a good clubhouse guy too if you subscribe to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

He does better with the cheap pickups like Brach, Bleier, and Castro.    Here's some of his misses.

He's missed on Wesley Wright and Ryan Webb.   I guess there's a lesson there.   I hope.

 

 

Webb was at least decent, we just had a really excellent bullpen that year. The move to get rid of Webb was much worse than Webb.

Don't forget TJ McFarland, Vance Worley, Chaz Roe etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

He wasn't "way better" last year.

Hunter’s never really done it for me.    His fastball is too straight and there’s no deception in his delivery.    I never feel a hitter is uncomfortable against him even though he throws hard.    He had a good season in 2017, and maybe he’s doing something a little different now, but he certainly had never been at that level before being installed as our closer.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
    • More than once Fredi displayed a lack of control that cost him his job. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...