Jump to content

O's interested in OF Preston Tucker


sportsfan8703

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

One year older than Rickard with a better track record of success in the minors.  I'm talking about for the 4th/5th OF spot.  I just don't see how Rickard is a given on this team.  We obviously liked Tucker before. 

I’m as low on Rickard as anyone but Rickard can play all three OF positions in a pinch, Tucker cannot and is poor defensively in LF. DJ Stewart is a better version of Preston Tucker already in the organization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

Please tell those guys at CamdenDepot that RZNJ is not just a “guy on message board!”  >:(

Granderson 2017: 1.5 rWAR

Tucker 2017: -1.1 rWAR

That’s “not much difference?”    That said, I’m not too high on the Granderson idea.

That negative WAR for Tucker was in 2016.  He didn't play in the MLB in 2017 hahaha.  Tucker looked good as a rookie and has good MILB numbers. 

I'm not saying he's some savior.  My point is that he's a guy we've liked before.  He could have been pressing in SSS in 2016 because he knew that he had a whole slew of guys behind him.  Sometimes pressure bursts pipes.  He could be a change of scenery guy. 

We pick up bullpen guys in this same situation all the time.  Guys that have some success, but are from an organization with good depth that can't keep them around.  How many waiver claims has DD made like this over the years? 

He seemed like an athletic guy watching him, I don't know how his defensive metrics were so terrible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
    • More than once Fredi displayed a lack of control that cost him his job. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...