Jump to content

Cashner signing


jcaponio

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

I agree it’s not a promising profile, but one thing I noticed when I was digging through the data on brooksbaseball was that it seems like the lower strikeout rate was mostly a matter of choice for Cashner. He switched from Slider to Cutter which missed far less bats. He also threw his sinker much more instead of his 4S fastball that generates almost twice as many swinging strikes. I’m tempted at least to think he could go back to 2015/2016 Cashner if he wanted to.

I think it was on purpose, and that's part of what's worrying.  He probably thinks that the change directly lead to his 2017 success.  I think if you ran his 2017 season over a bunch of times you'd see that a 3.40 ERA is about as good as it would ever get, and most pitchers with his underlying peripherals would have an ERA north of 4.50.  It'll take a period of sustained poor results for him to want to go back to his 2015-16 approach that resulted in an 81 ERA+ in National League pitcher's parks.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

I agree it’s not a promising profile, but one thing I noticed when I was digging through the data on brooksbaseball was that it seems like the lower strikeout rate was mostly a matter of choice for Cashner. He switched from Slider to Cutter which missed far less bats. He also threw his sinker much more instead of his 4S fastball that generates almost twice as many swinging strikes. I’m tempted at least to think he could go back to 2015/2016 Cashner if he wanted to.

I tend to agree with you that some of Cashner's lack of strikeouts is by choice. I suspect he elected to pitch to contact a little more with the Texas infield behind him. A ground ball pitcher playing to his strengths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I think it was on purpose, and that's part of what's worrying.  He probably thinks that the change directly lead to his 2017 success.  I think if you ran his 2017 season over a bunch of times you'd see that a 3.40 ERA is about as good as it would ever get, and most pitchers with his underlying peripherals would have an ERA north of 4.50.  It'll take a period of sustained poor results for him to want to go back to his 2015-16 approach that resulted in an 81 ERA+ in National League pitcher's parks.

Cashner's regression is practically certain, but if the regression is from 3.4x ERA to 4.50, I think that is still a win for the Orioles considering the dollars that were committed. I do not discount the possibility that he could be much worse and that this could be a bad signing.

At face value, IMO, this is a good signing if there is another larger acquisition coming. If this is the best pitcher the club intends to sign then I would rather they had not even bothered.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

We made the playoffs in 2016 with a rotation of Tillman, Gausman, Ubaldo, Gallardo, Wright/Wilson/Worley. 

I think Bundy, Gausman, Cashner, Tillman, Castro/Cortes/Wright could be better. 

For 2016, you should have included Bundy, who made more starts (14) than Wright (12), Wilson (13) or Worley (4).   Miley also made 11 starts.  

I’m definitely not ready to say this rotation will be better than that one, but that one certainly wasn’t very good (4.72 ERA, 13th in the AL), so it’s possible.   

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Es4M11 said:

Cashner's regression is practically certain, but if the regression is from 3.4x ERA to 4.50, I think that is still a win for the Orioles considering the dollars that were committed. I do not discount the possibility that he could be much worse and that this could be a bad signing.

At face value, IMO, this is a good signing if there is another larger acquisition coming. If this is the best pitcher the club intends to sign then I would rather they had not even bothered.

Yes, it's a positive thing that they just paid for one win.  But on the other hand... they just paid for one win, and stuck it in the #3 spot in the rotation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

There have been seven pitchers in the last five years who had a K rate under 5.00, and qualified for the ERA title.

Kevin Correia, 2013.  In 2014 he posted a 5.44 ERA, and in 2015 he pitched the last 23 innings of his career.
Jeremy Guthrie, 2013.  In 2014 he actually upped his K rate and had a better year.  In 2015 his ERA was 5.95 and his career essentially ended.
Martin Perez, 2016.  In 2017 he had a 4.82 ERA.
Cashner, Perez' teammate.
Ty Blach, 2017.  Obviously we don't know about 2018 yet. In '17 he had a 4.78 ERA, good for a 87 ERA+.
Mark Buehrle, 2015.  Retired after the season.
Mike Pelfrey, 2015.  In the following two years he combined to throw 239 innings to a 5.50.

"Ground ball pitcher" is a descriptive term, not a quality measurement.

You would have hated Scott Mcgregor.  Never struck out 5 guys per nine innings in a season in his career. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Yes, it's a positive thing that they just paid for one win.  But on the other hand... they just paid for one win, and stuck it in the #3 spot in the rotation.

I'm hoping there is more to come. Not holding my breath or anything, but why defer some of Cashner's money this year unless you have immediate plans for it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Es4M11 said:

I tend to agree with you that some of Cashner's lack of strikeouts is by choice. I suspect he elected to pitch to contact a little more with the Texas infield behind him. A ground ball pitcher playing to his strengths.

Texas was ranked 25th (out of 30) in team fielding last season so I'm not sure that strategy holds up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wildbillhiccup said:

I wouldn't rule it out. I'm pretty sure the Oriole's spring training facility has the same words engraved on it as the statue of liberty when it comes to starting pitchers. 

Im not ruling it out, but it makes sense, since he was willing to accept a bounce-back deal, and a few teams has kicked the tires, and nobody has inked him.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I thought of it but decided the FCL thread was more relevant. But your more than welcome to.
    • Remember Komi Uehera?  Great splitter. The problem was you have to throw the fastball to set it up. He had an average fastball. The Red Sox did ride him to a WS though. 
    • July 1: Chayce McDermott, 7 IP, 12 K’s July 4: Yeiber Cartaya, 4 IP, 10 K’s.   It’s possible I’ve missed one or two so far.    
    • He is such an interesting case. Obviously the extraordinarily late “breakout” age, but you also just almost never see a true one-pitch pitcher in today’s game. Aside from the splitter, he has no ML-quality pitches. The 4-seam fastball is mediocre at best in velocity for a reliever (94.6 MPH), it’s on the straighter side, and it gets tagged to the tune of a .405 wOBA (with a .400 xWOBA to match). It’s a bottom-tier 4-seamer.  And then he throws a cutter 27% of the time. A cutter which is so bad that I can only imagine Palmer would have a coronary watching him continue to throw it. It is arguably the worst pitch in baseball this season, and over the course of his two ML seasons, hitters are posting a .486 wOBA against it. What’s most shocking is that StatCast suggests he’s been lucky to get that outcome, with a staggering .511 xWOBA on two seasons worth of cutters.    Ah, but then you have that splitter. The gift from God. And it really is, to be honest. This is a dude who would be working some every day job like the rest of us if he didn’t somehow master that splitter. But he did, and now he’s making bank playing a game. So far this season, 81 PAs ending on a splitter. Opponents have 4 hits against it (.056 BA). All those hits have been singles. 53 of those PAs ended with the hitter slinking back to the dugout (a cool 65.1% K rate), and it carries a 58.1% whiff rate. The average EV against the splitter this year is 76.7 MPH. The two-year wOBA on the splitter is .133, with a .137 xWOBA to match. Those are goofy numbers. Those are the numbers my 5-year-old nephew will put up against my best wiffleball arsenal this afternoon.    In sum, really interesting guy. Only having one effective pitch concerns me — on the days when the splitter is not splitting, he’s useless. The splitter has gotten more effective this year, not less, so that does assuage some of my concerns about the league eventually getting the book on him and spitting on the splitter in order to wait for a chance to pulverize the other junk he tosses. But is he a guy you can run out 4-5 times against the same elite hitters in a short span in October? It just seems like they’d have to get a solid feel for him after seeing a few times back to back. But if all it would cost is someone like Billy Cook, there’s really no harm done in finding out. 
    • Hopefully it extends Adleys longevity as well.  
    • Raylin Ramos returned to action today.
    • Fred Biletnikoff!  King of Stick.  Lol.  The refs hated him because every time he touched the ball it got the gook all over it and then the refs got it all over themselves.  Lol  And I agree that it should be allowed in a modest way in MLB. Just because you say it, doesn't make it so. What year was it before they started checking Pitchers after every half inning for sticky substances?  There was a year where it was pretty clear that pitchers were using something... tacki-goo?  I forget what year that was.  Were arm injuries up that year?  It might sway me a little if they were, but otherwise I don't think the the firmness of the grip is indicative of the spin.  The firmness of the grip is the control of the ball itself.  A harder grip would diminish spin.  Think of it as "english" in tennis.  The racquet glances the ball, but its the speed of the racquet that determines the spin.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...