Jump to content

David Hess 2018


Rene88

Recommended Posts

I thought Hess pitched pretty well last night.  Granted, Toronto's lineup isn't what it was, but they still have some guys that can rake.  He's had his ups and downs this year, but that's really to be expected from most rookie pitchers breaking into the big leagues.  I think he's got potential to be a decent starter for us.  If they do keep Cobb and Cashner, and you figure Bundy and Hess into the rotation next year, that's not awful.  They might not stink as much as we think they will if they can play some defense and hold some leads when they have them.  Granted, I'm talking about losing 85-90 vice losing 95-100, lol.  But still, at least somewhat watchable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 254
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Hess is a good example to me of allowing a player to get comfortable in the majors and play through their ups and downs versus sending them back and forth on the Norfolk shuttle because of a few bad outing or his TTTP.  Hess is a competitor and has learned how to work with his stuff through 500+ minor league innings.  We need to end the practice of yo-yo players up and down.  It destroys their confidence and does not allow them to develop and learn in the majors.  The best example is whatever has happened to Cisco this year.  He seems to have been buried because he is not a Buck guy.  Is it any surprise he is deflated and has played poorly upon his third trip back to AAA.  It was somewhat excusable when you were fighting for the playoffs but not at this point.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s nice to see Hess regroup after getting knocked around a while.   

Games 1-5: 29.1 IP, 3.07 ERA

Games 6-12: 24.0 IP, 10.50 ERA

Games 13-16: 24.2 IP, 2.19 ERA

It would be great if he could get his ERA under 5.00 and keep it there.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, The Goob said:

Hess is a good example to me of allowing a player to get comfortable in the majors and play through their ups and downs versus sending them back and forth on the Norfolk shuttle because of a few bad outing or his TTTP.  Hess is a competitor and has learned how to work with his stuff through 500+ minor league innings.  We need to end the practice of yo-yo players up and down.  It destroys their confidence and does not allow them to develop and learn in the majors.  The best example is whatever has happened to Cisco this year.  He seems to have been buried because he is not a Buck guy.  Is it any surprise he is deflated and has played poorly upon his third trip back to AAA.  It was somewhat excusable when you were fighting for the playoffs but not at this point.  

Inclined to agree, but if someone like Cisco can't handle the adversity of being sent down to AAA then he's not gonna be able to handle the adversity of being in the MLB full time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Goob said:

Hess is a good example to me of allowing a player to get comfortable in the majors and play through their ups and downs versus sending them back and forth on the Norfolk shuttle because of a few bad outing or his TTTP.  Hess is a competitor and has learned how to work with his stuff through 500+ minor league innings.  We need to end the practice of yo-yo players up and down.  It destroys their confidence and does not allow them to develop and learn in the majors.  The best example is whatever has happened to Cisco this year.  He seems to have been buried because he is not a Buck guy.  Is it any surprise he is deflated and has played poorly upon his third trip back to AAA.  It was somewhat excusable when you were fighting for the playoffs but not at this point.  

Hess was demoted and pitched a 9 strikeout gem before his recall. If Gausman and others hadn't been traded, he probably would have stayed down. 

 

I don't see how you can blame Cisco laying a dud on Buck. The opportunity was there and he wasn't able to take advantage. That is on him. The Orioles have history of wanting C to work on defense in the minors instead of at the major league level. If Cisco improves, then he will get another chance next year to earn the starting job. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Goob said:

Hess is a good example to me of allowing a player to get comfortable in the majors and play through their ups and downs versus sending them back and forth on the Norfolk shuttle because of a few bad outing or his TTTP.  Hess is a competitor and has learned how to work with his stuff through 500+ minor league innings.  We need to end the practice of yo-yo players up and down.  It destroys their confidence and does not allow them to develop and learn in the majors.  The best example is whatever has happened to Cisco this year.  He seems to have been buried because he is not a Buck guy.  Is it any surprise he is deflated and has played poorly upon his third trip back to AAA.  It was somewhat excusable when you were fighting for the playoffs but not at this point.  

Sisco looked lost at the plate and did nothing defensively. He only had to beat out Caleb Joseph and did not take advantage of the opportunity. Hope he turns it around but I don't see what would have been achieved by keeping him in the majors. Sending him down gave us a chance to look at Wynns, who has been much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Goob said:

Hess is a good example to me of allowing a player to get comfortable in the majors and play through their ups and downs versus sending them back and forth on the Norfolk shuttle because of a few bad outing or his TTTP.  Hess is a competitor and has learned how to work with his stuff through 500+ minor league innings.  We need to end the practice of yo-yo players up and down.  It destroys their confidence and does not allow them to develop and learn in the majors.  The best example is whatever has happened to Cisco this year.  He seems to have been buried because he is not a Buck guy.  Is it any surprise he is deflated and has played poorly upon his third trip back to AAA.  It was somewhat excusable when you were fighting for the playoffs but not at this point.  

Sisco not being up here and playing every day is ridiculous, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, esmd said:

I get what you guys are saying about Sisco needing to have thicker skin, but they've what, 30-90 something?  Let him play through it and take his lumps.

The guy was under .200 in AAA about two weeks ago.    He’s finally warming up now.    I’m fine with the way they handled him.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, esmd said:

And we have several guys hitting around or under .200 here.  He needs to play, IMO, especially on a team that's already lost 90+ games.

Not trying to pile on, but he is playing.  The number of losses in Baltimore are totally unrelated to where he can develop best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

Not trying to pile on, but he is playing.  The number of losses in Baltimore are totally unrelated to where he can develop best.

I get it what you're saying, I just think he should be developing in Baltimore.  He's already played 489 games in the minors, with over 100 games at both Bowie and Norfolk.  He's got nothing left to prove there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, esmd said:

Oh, and btw, he's hitting .241 with a .674 OPS at Norfolk.  Nothing to write home about, but not horrible, and again, they need to see what he can do up here, not in Norfolk.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=sisco-000cha

Only because he heated up in the last two weeks.  He was ice cold before that.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • The earliest 2025 NFBC results exist, and slotted him about the 30th best AL starter for 2025 alone's expected statistical production.    Eflin and all five guys in Tampa's forecast rotation (Baz, McClanahan, Pepiot, Bradley, Springs) fell around that level. That assumes free agents Burnes, Snell, Flaherty, Kikuchi, Pivetta, Fried and Manaea fall about half into the AL. He'll start Opening Day, but it is a byproduct of the disappointing beginning to Grayson's career and Bradish's current injury. I think odds are pretty low he is a 2026 Oriole.
    • Whoever we add needs to be able to play a solid CF or LF at OPACY and Pham definitely does not fit that bill.
    • I'm one for Tommy Pham, even though I'll take heat for it.  I think the veteran aspect of it could be key. O'Neil would be great, but he also brings more of what we have in the Ks and HRs department
    • Let's see how he does over a full year here first so we don't overpay for a SSS. He was pretty pedestrian prior to the trade.
    • I could see against tough lefties Holiday sits, Westy at 2B, and Mayo at 3B.  Or Holiday at SS to spell Gunnar sometimes too and this being the configuration. But yes, most of Holiday at 2B, Westy at 3B and Mayo DH or 1B.
    • I don't think you bring Slater back if you add Bader (unless Austin's willing to take a MiLB deal and start the year at Norfolk) because then you have to get rid of either Urias or Mateo, and that doesn't seem wise with how thinned out the IF depth is now and Holliday still trying to get his feet under him.
    • This is true. However, it is more situational in the post season. Guys are pitched to differently. You have to take what the game gives you. Home runs happen, but the best teams know when to take that shot and when to shorten up or be more line drive oriented. Home runs can be a surprise to good hitters who simply were in time and put a good swing on plane through the ball. It was a line drive that ran out of field. Hitters have to know who they are. Some sit on fast balls early in the count in a certain small box. If they get it, they take that A swing. Or maybe they sit off speed early. They may take a strike that is more of a pitcher’s pitch, or one they were not looking for. if you’re sitting fastball early, not a great idea to swing at a curveball. Or vice versa. Whatever the case, with two strikes, you have to think contact and productive at bat. For some, that approach may be sooner in the at bat, of the situation dictates it. There is no BABIP if there is not a ball in play. So luck plays no role in a strikeout. It seemed like the Orioles, as a whole, in 2024 were looking a certain pitch, and if the pitch was hittable they would hack. Even if it was just off the plate. Too many big swings, and tons of resulting misses, in key situations where shortening up a bit was the better approach. Lastly, not many of our guys are true “home run hitters.” What I mean by that is when Santander strikes out swinging at a piece ch with a big cut. I get it. That is his game to be focused on driving the ball. That is what he gets paid to do. Along with that comes a fair amount of swing and miss, and roll over ground balls. Not all our hitters should be having the same approach. Gunnar may hit 35-40 home runs in a season, but he is a much more dynamic hitter than just a “home run guy.” He is capable of doing anything on the field. He is extremely talented, and we have a few more that may fall into that category some day. There are times to adjust and take what the game gives you. Go oppo for a single, put pressure on the defense. This game is hard, but we can do better. If we are going to win, we must do much better.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...