Jump to content

Nick The Stick


VICIOUS

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

It's not so much that Nick left, it's that the Orioles never found an adequate replacement.  Nick's accumulated 4.1 WAR the first three years of his contract if you go by baseball-reference.com

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/m/markani01.shtml

It's not so much that Nick left.

It's not even so much that the Orioles never found an adequate replacement.

It's that we gave up Zach Davies, Stephen Brault and a couple of others trying to find that replacement.   And that we spent financial resources and roster spots on Mark Trumbo, Colby Rasmus, and others trying to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply
3 minutes ago, SteveA said:

It's not so much that Nick left.

It's not even so much that the Orioles never found an adequate replacement.

It's that we gave up Zach Davies, Stephen Brault and a couple of others trying to find that replacement.   And that we spent financial resources and roster spots on Mark Trumbo, Colby Rasmus, and others trying to do so.

That too, now I feel a little ill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We haven't chosen well with which free agents to retain in the last few years.

It's not this simple obviously but imagine if, say, we had re-signed Markakis, Cruz, Pearce, and Miller instead of Trumbo, Davis, Tillman, and O'Day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Spy Fox said:

We haven't chosen well with which free agents to retain in the last few years.

It's not this simple obviously but imagine if, say, we had re-signed Markakis, Cruz, Pearce, and Miller instead of Trumbo, Davis, Tillman, and O'Day.

I know it adds to the symmetry but I wouldn't include Pearce on that list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Batting .338 with 7 HR's and 28 RBI's.   Good thing we didn't need a player like that.  Maybe we can get him back in some sorta package for Manny as an add on player?  The merry-go-round in RF since he left has truly been a disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The key to building a winning franchise is to sign players to long-term deals so that they can be well-paid but mediocre performers for years, but late in the deal the guy can have an out-of-nowhere month and buoy the sprits of an otherwise cratering team.

The second key is to trade your out-of-contract young star for that guy based on the best 100 ABs he's had in the last five years.

If the O's trade Manny and get anyone over the age of 30 back it better be Trinidad Hubbard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles clearly messed that up, I mean who didn't see a guy the two years before free agency that averaged .273 .336 obp .705 ops and averaged 12 homers i season with declining outfield speed at the age of 31 would be on pace for his best season of his career at 35.  Oh and i forgot was coming of a neck injury.  We need to get rid of the guy that didn't see this season coming. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

The Orioles clearly messed that up, I mean who didn't see a guy the two years before free agency that averaged .273 .336 obp .705 ops and averaged 12 homers i season with declining outfield speed at the age of 31 would be on pace for his best season of his career at 35.  Oh and i forgot was coming of a neck injury.  We need to get rid of the guy that didn't see this season coming. 

I'm sure with Nick on this year's team the O's would have 11, maybe 12 wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

It's nice to look at Nick right now and be like OMFG THE ORIOLES MESSED UP THEY'RE SO STUPID!

But had we had him for the last three years with his output people would be like OMFG THE ORIOLES MESSED UP THEY'RE SO STUPID!

It's kind of interesting because most reasonable people would say the Orioles both did the right thing by not extending him all those years ago (due to his age and declining production) and at the same time have done an absolutely TERRIBLE job replacing his production in RF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

It's nice to look at Nick right now and be like OMFG THE ORIOLES MESSED UP THEY'RE SO STUPID!

But had we had him for the last three years with his output people would be like OMFG THE ORIOLES MESSED UP THEY'RE SO STUPID!

That Chris Davis contract looks pretty spectacular the last 3 days. Can't believe we've griped about it so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

It's nice to look at Nick right now and be like OMFG THE ORIOLES MESSED UP THEY'RE SO STUPID!

But had we had him for the last three years with his output people would be like OMFG THE ORIOLES MESSED UP THEY'RE SO STUPID!

He would have led the team in doubles in two of those three years and been just two behind Manny in the other. He also would have led the team in OBP in two of the years and just behind Kim in the other.

Right Fielders during that time

2015 - Gerrado Parra (Zach Davies) Chris Davis, Delmon Young, Travis Snider, Dariel Alvarez, De Aza, Flaherty, Pearce, Parmalee, Reimold,  Parades

2016 - Trumbo, Rickard, Bourn, Stubbs, Reimold, Pearce, Davis, Flaherty, Alvarez

2017 - Seth Smith, Rickard, Trumbo, Gentry, Hays, Santander, Mancini, Flaherty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

He would have led the team in doubles in two of those three years and been just two behind Manny in the other. He also would have led the team in OBP in two of the years and just behind Kim in the other.

Right Fielders during that time

2015 - Gerrado Parra (Zach Davies) Chris Davis, Delmon Young, Travis Snider, Dariel Alvarez, De Aza, Flaherty, Pearce, Parmalee, Reimold,  Parades

2016 - Trumbo, Rickard, Bourn, Stubbs, Reimold, Pearce, Davis, Flaherty, Alvarez

2017 - Seth Smith, Rickard, Trumbo, Gentry, Hays, Santander, Mancini, Flaherty

Just because the O's didn't do a good job at replacing him doesn't mean he was irreplaceable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

It's nice to look at Nick right now and be like OMFG THE ORIOLES MESSED UP THEY'RE SO STUPID!

But had we had him for the last three years with his output people would be like OMFG THE ORIOLES MESSED UP THEY'RE SO STUPID!

He wasn't that good for the Braves until this year.  The bigger issue has been the failure to find a suitable replacement.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...